Where did you find Campbell meant HJ to be male-only?Hero (to me, anyway) isn't a gendered term, and it's irritating to learn that Campbell saw it that way.
Where did you find Campbell meant HJ to be male-only?
And what about books and movies with female protagonists? I have read that Campbell felt there was no such thing as a "heroine's" journey, because in storytelling, women are "always" unchanging plot devices of some kind (except when they aren't, but he seemed to ignore myths with female protagonists). Today, we tend to call that kind of thinking sexist, and there's more attention to the under representation of women and girls in movies and books. Some say there's a parallel story structure for female heroes (the heroine's journey), which encompasses a quest for wholeness that women experience in patriarchal societies. But forcing every story with a female protagonist into that shell would be just as problematic.
Until recently a Heroine's Journey looked very different. She stayed home, not allowed to go out and risk herself. When she did go out it was under guard and to a different sheltered place, as a wife and eventual mother.
Here is a short list of movie titles, some are old, some are new, some are classics. They are all about a Heroine going through a character change - as the main plot line or as an arc, which is what HJ is about at the end of the day.{...} and the persistent presumptions about women's lives throughout history.
Here is a short list of movie titles, some are old, some are new, some are classics. They are all about a Heroine going through a character change - as the main plot line or as an arc, which is what HJ is about at the end of the day.
Titanic
The Silence Of The Lambs
Sicario
Out Of Africa
Amelie
Agnes Of God
Juno
Terms Of Endearment
The Devil Wears Prada
Campbell's work was published in 1949. This was a long time ago. As stated above, the better reference is Vogler's The Writer's Journey ( link ). It's much cleaner in terms of explanations and a straight-to-the-point practical guide for novelists.
-cb
I decided I wanted to write this story with a subtext of inequality v equality.
I did find a rather nasty Heroines journey version where the first element the Heroine must do is abandon her femininity, become man-like.
There are two main story lines in Hero's Journey. The Desire, which is the physical journey, and the Need, which is the change the Heroine must undergo psychologically through a series of encounters with Opponents. It could be something within herself - ex: lack of confidence - or something with others - ex:arrogance. What you need to avoid in crafting these encounters is turning the succession into a series of Plot Coupons ( link ).
Do you need to follow every step in Campbell's list or even Vogler's list? No. Just remember that many of those steps are optional. The succession of encounters that trigger a small character change with a final major encounter that triggers the ultimate self-realization are the core parts. Call To Adventure? All stories have some inflection point that propels the Heroine into the adventure; it's sort of given. Refusal Of The Call? This could be reduced to a one-liner like "Gosh. That sounds dangerous". Meeting The Mentor? If you want one. The Road Back? Can do without.
Below is a video from John Truby. He explains it better that any other story guru out there. His Myth genre is like any other genre, like Love, Mystery, or Thriller, so it's not presented like the panacea structure to all stories out there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4u4kAMTZC8
Hope this helps.
-cb
I'm not entirely sure what your point is. There has always been representation of women in popular culture. My point is that it's often spoken of as if it doesn't exist, and it's often forgotten a few scant years after it's acclaimed.
I have seen first-hand how often female SF writers (as, ahem, a totally random for instance) are hailed as pioneers in the genre, never mind the women writing award-winning bestsellers within the previous twelve months (or twelve years, or forty years, or...). We're always here, and yet to a certain segment of the population reacts like goldfish: as soon as we're out of sight, we don't exist anymore.
Anyway, all this is OT. My only real point about the Hero's Journey as discussed in this thread is that it strikes me as a fairly typical mythic story arc that appears in a lot of genres.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldx1TbG8rnk&t=92s
Have a link? I don't recall coming across this last time I read the book.
-cb
This one? The Problem of Woman as Hero in the Work of Joseph CampbellI've found a paper on the limitations of the hero's journey with regards to female protagonists.
For women seeking symbolic representation of themselves as hero, Campbell insistence that mythology must ‘live’, renewed in each age, provides hope. As illustrated by Inanna’s journey, strong mythic examples of woman do exist, and Campbell’s theory leaves the interpretation of mythology open to the sort of process necessary to adequately unravel and rebuild these mythic images of Woman, and her journey of inquiry into humanity and divinity, as living myth.
I hope no one is assuming I am embarking on a paint by numbers approach just because I have referenced the heroes journey structure.
FWIW, I don't assume you or anyone else on the boards is writing paint by numbers, and nothing you've said here would make me think otherwise. Don't mistake enthusiastic discussion of the subject as anyone remarking on your work specifically. (Especially me. I do go on. )
I hope no one is assuming I am embarking on a paint by numbers approach just because I have referenced the heroes journey structure.
If, as a writer, I am unable to transcend the limits of a structured approach or indeed put together a tale without a template,I might as well just forget the whole thing.
Thing is, humans have always loved those stories and always will. We were built to love those stories.