Asking for advice

Lil

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
867
Reaction score
155
Location
New York
I got this nice review for Lord Edward's Mysterious Treasure from Library Journal:
"A rousing historical romance that examines issues of class and privilege, as well as provides insight into both the French Revolution and the Paris Commune; highly recommended."
My daughter says I should peddle my books as historical fiction rather than historical romance. They do all involve a romance, but they also tend to be heavy on the history.
I don't know which way to go.
 

Marissa D

Scribe of the girls in the basement
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
3,071
Reaction score
365
Location
New England but hankering for the old one
Website
www.marissadoyle.com
I haven't had the pleasure of reading your book...but here's a question I've heard asked when trying to determine where a book falls when it straddles genres: what plot point gets wrapped up last--the history, or the romance?
 

RightHoJeeves

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Nov 28, 2013
Messages
1,326
Reaction score
155
Location
Perth
Are you self publishing? One route you could take that might illuminate things a little bit is to run contrasting Facebook ads - one positioning your book as historical fiction, one as historical romance. If there is a clear winner, go with that one.
 

avekevin

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
105
Reaction score
14
Location
California, USA
Someone who clearly reads a lot of books considers it historical romance. It's hard to discount that opinion.
 

Lil

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
867
Reaction score
155
Location
New York
Are you self publishing? One route you could take that might illuminate things a little bit is to run contrasting Facebook ads - one positioning your book as historical fiction, one as historical romance. If there is a clear winner, go with that one.
Contrasting ads—now that's an interesting idea. Maybe I could try that.
 

Tom from UK

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
682
Reaction score
127
Location
London
Website
tomwilliamsauthor.co.uk
My impression is that historical romance is more marketable than just historical - but maybe I'm biased because my stories are not romances. (I thought that at least some were because they had a strong relationship at the centre, but apparently they don't count if they don't have a happy ending. :Shrug:)
 

Sonsofthepharaohs

Still writing the ancient Egyptian tetralogy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
5,297
Reaction score
2,752
Location
UK
My impression is that historical romance is more marketable than just historical

I'd say it's not so much a case of HR being more marketable as it is a case of who the market is. The readership of HR is almost exclusively women, and women buy more books - why do you think romance is the biggest selling genre on the planet? On the other hand straight HF can be a very masculine genre, because those stories tend to focus more on the political and military spheres that were traditionally dominated by men. I don't know many women who read male authored adventure stories by the likes of Simon Scarrow, Ben Kane, Bernard Cornwell, C S Forester etc, but plenty who read Philippa Greggory, Dorothy Dunnet, Mary Renault, Rosemary Sutcliffe, Elizabeth Chadwick etc.

But on the flip side... all those female authors are considered to have written historical fiction (although sometimes positioned as women's fiction), not romance. And incidentally, out of the top 10 best selling HF authors, 7 are women :)

So basically, I think there are advantages and disadvantages of positioning it as either genre, so I don't think 'marketability' should even come into it. If you've written a historical romance, market it as such, and visa versa. But the last thing you want to do is label it dishonestly in an attempt to sell more copies - that won't go down well with anyone.
 
Last edited by a moderator: