• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Evolution: Ancient fish skulls shake up the vertebrate evolutionary tree

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,751
Reaction score
15,180
Location
Massachusetts
The largest group of fishes may be 40 million years younger than we thought.

Ars Technica said:
Around 400 million years ago, the world was warm. Animals were beginning to emerge from the oceans, and plants began to spread across the Earth. The northern Appalachian mountains were raised as the continents of Euramerica and Gondwana met. And the fish family reached a major splitting point.

One group branched off to become the lobe-finned fishes (like the famous coelacanth), which later spun off a group called the tetrapods. That’s us—we’re tetrapods, along with all other mammals, reptiles, birds, and amphibians. The other group became what we think of as stereotypical fish: the ray-finned fishes. That’s more or less every bone-filled fish you can think of: tuna, eels, goldfish (but not sharks; they’re cartilaginous, not bony).

A paper in Nature this week reports that ray-finned fishes may be a whole 40 million years younger than previously thought—and that a number of fossil species have been placed in the wrong slot on the family tree. The finding points to how crucial this period in evolutionary history is to our understanding of the evolution of modern vertebrates. And in the process, it clarifies the history of a strange fish that still lives in Africa called the bichir.

Outlying cousins

The living ray-finned fishes are mostly unambiguously classified, but there’s a group of black-sheep relatives: the bichir and reedfish. They’re a little weird, and they have “long vexed vertebrate biologists,” write Sam Giles, a paleobiologist at Oxford University, and her colleagues. Only in the early 20th century were these weird cousins understood to belong to the ray-finned fish family, but as an outsider group.

It’s thought that the bichir group split off from the rest of the family very early on, close to 385 million years ago. But the fossil record hasn’t been fruitful in confirming this; the oldest relevant fossils are around 100 million years old.

So Giles and colleagues turned to a group of fossil fish found across Russia, China, Kyrgyzstan, and the US. These "scanilepiform" fossils are dated to around 250 million years old—around the time of the first dinosaurs. Based on physical similarity, they have been classified as close cousins of other ray-finned fishes. But they have some similarities to these hard-to-classify bichir, too.

Using three-dimensional CT scans, Giles and her colleagues examined the details of well-preserved scanilepiform skulls. They used data on physical characteristics, as well as genetic data, to re-sketch the family tree. It came out looking somewhat different to what was previously thought.

...
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,124
Reaction score
10,887
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Oooh, cool. I remember bichirs being sort of a curiosity when I was teaching comparative vertebrate anatomy. The text had them over next to the sturgeon and paddlefish etc., but they were a separate group no one really knew what to do with. They used to think they might be related to gars, because of their ganoid scales, but I remember reading a while back that scale type are of less phylogenetic significance than once thought.
 
Last edited:

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,751
Reaction score
15,180
Location
Massachusetts
We slowly get a clearer picture of the paths evolution took, don't we? Probably will always be discovering more, given how spotty the fossil record is.