If You Visited DisruptJ20.com the Justice Department Wants To Know

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Big Brother Loves You. :evil


If you’ve visited the website DisruptJ20, which helped organize protests during the inauguration of Donald Trump, the Department of Justice is interested in learning more about you.


On Saturday, a judge in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia approved a search warrant that would require DreamHost, DisruptJ20’s provider, to turn over a wide range of information about the site and its visitors. In addition to information about the site’s creators, the DOJ demands “logs showing connections related to the website, and any other transactional information, including records of session times and duration.” In short, the government is looking for records of everyone who even visited the site, which is to say it's effectively compiling info on those who showed even a modicum of interest in protesting the administration.


DreamHost is resisting the effort. In a blog post, the company acknowledges that it has “no insight into the affidavit for the search warrant (those records are sealed).” Nevertheless, DreamHost also writes that its general counsel “has taken issue with this particular search warrant for being a highly untargeted demand that chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution.” As it goes on to explain, turning over the requested records would mean providing 1.3 million visitor IP addresses, along with “contact information, email content, and photos of thousands of people.”

As ZDNet notes, “Several purported members of [DisruptJ20] were arrested for alleged violent conduct during the protests.” It links to a Washington Post article from January that claims, “Police said in court filings that the damage caused by the group was in excess of $100,000.”


In advance of the inauguration itself, however, the organizers claimed on their site laid out sweeping, but still legal, goals. “We’re planning a series of massive direct actions that will shut down the Inauguration ceremonies and any related celebrations–the Inaugural parade, the Inaugural balls, you name it,” they claimed.


DreamHost’s blog post stresses that those who came to the site in search of information about such activities had every right to do so, just as they had every right to protest the inauguration. As such, it’s not clear why the DOJ would need their IP addresses and other, related data. “That information could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech protected under the Constitution’s First Amendment,” the post reads. “This is, in our opinion, a strong example of investigatory overreach and a clear abuse of government authority.”
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
Welp, time to go visit DisruptJ20 for the first time then...
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,522
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
This is such an egregious violation of DOJ's duty. They represent the people, not the president. It'a also a violation of freedom of "assembly," as I believe it can be very forcefully argued that internet enclaves are today's equivalent of the town square. DreamHost is fighting, I assume the ACLU will aid them, and other tech privacy advocates. Won't be surprised to see this go all the way to the Supreme Court if DOJ doesn't back down, though.
 

Splendor

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
111
Reaction score
13
This is what they're spending their time investigating? Wow. It's just a horrible nightmare we're in now.
 

Twick

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
715
Location
Canada
The U.S. government is now run by cartoon villains. There's no other explanation.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,822
Reaction score
6,576
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
DreamHost blog response.
For the past several months, DreamHost has been working with the Department of Justice to comply with legal process, including a Search Warrant (PDF) seeking information about one of our customers’ websites.

At the center of the requests is disruptj20.org, a website that organized participants of political protests against the current United States administration. While we have no insight into the affidavit for the search warrant (those records are sealed), the DOJ has recently asked DreamHost to provide all information available to us about this website, its owner, and, more importantly, its visitors.

On the not to worry too much side: SCOTUS has already ruled.

NAACP vs Alabama
Brief Fact Summary. The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) held unconstitutional Alabama’s demand that the NAACP reveal the names and addresses of all of its Alabama members and agents.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. In the domain of indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press, or association, abridgments of such rights, even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of governmental action. Compelled disclosure of affiliation with groups engaged in advocacy may constitute an effective restraint on freedom of association.
Held. Yes. Judgment of the lower court reversed. In the domain of indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press, or association, abridgments of such rights, even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of governmental action. Compelled disclosure of affiliation with groups engaged in advocacy may constitute an effective restraint on freedom of association. There is a vital relationship between freedom to associate and privacy in one’s associations. This production order must be regarded as entailing the likelihood of a substantial restraint upon the exercise by the Petitioner’s members of their freedom of association. Further, it is apparent that forced disclosure would result in adversely affecting the members to pursue their collective effort to foster beliefs, which they have the right to advocate. Therefore, compelled disclosure of membership lists violates the Petitioner’s members’ rights of freedom of association.
No. Judgment of the lower court reversed. The Petitioner has not objected to divulging the identity of its members who are employed or hold office positions. There is no justification for the interest of obtaining membership lists.

Discussion. This case holds that disclosure of the membership lists is unconstitutional partly based on the “chilling effect” that it would have on the freedom of association.

On the, yes, we absolutely need to worry about this side: This is a glimpse into the current White House and given everything else going on, certainly worth serious concern.

They want voter's records, they want these kinds of political records. Makes one like me wonder if this isn't data they'd readily pass on to Cambridge Analytica. Now that is scary.
Standing before political and business leaders in New York last fall, Alexander Nix promised a revolution.

Many companies compete in the market for political microtargeting, using huge data sets and sophisticated software to identify and persuade voters. But Mr. Nix’s little-known firm, Cambridge Analytica, claimed to have developed something unique: “psychographic” profiles that could predict the personality and hidden political leanings of every American adult.

“Of the two candidates left in the election, one of them is using these technologies,” Mr. Nix said, referring to Donald J. Trump.

Guardian: The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked
In January 2013, a young American postgraduate was passing through London when she was called up by the boss of a firm where she’d previously interned. The company, SCL Elections, went on to be bought by Robert Mercer, a secretive hedge fund billionaire, renamed Cambridge Analytica, and achieved a certain notoriety as the data analytics firm that played a role in both Trump and Brexit campaigns. But all of this was still to come. London in 2013 was still basking in the afterglow of the Olympics. Britain had not yet Brexited. The world had not yet turned.

I may need to put on my tin foil hat to put 45s administration's attempts at massive data collection and Cambridge Analytica together. But surely 45 doesn't have his own team available to do anything with these records. So it makes sense they might just contract with CA and pass data like this on.
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
I'm tempted to donate a dollar, just to screw up their data.

-cb
 

AW Admin

Administrator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
18,772
Reaction score
6,286
They're issuing a lot of server warrants, and the language is such that the entire server is being requested (i.e. a large server could host hundreds of unrelated sites).
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
Maybe they'll find Hilary's lost emails.

*shrugs*

-cb
 
Last edited:

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
They're issuing a lot of server warrants, and the language is such that the entire server is being requested (i.e. a large server could host hundreds of unrelated sites).

Today, Disrupt20 and tomorrow...Absolute Write?

Nah. That could never happen. Right? Errr...right? :gone: