Trump to Ban Trans People from the Military

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
7,117
Location
Albany, NY
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says he will bar transgender individuals from serving “in any capacity” in the U.S. armed forces.
Trump said on Twitter Wednesday that after consulting with “Generals and military experts,” that the government “will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/president-trump-ban-transgender-individuals-u-s-military/

What a douche that fucker in the White House is. People want to serve their country (evil if it is an evil empire without historic parallel) can't because Donny's courting the religious right. I'm getting out of this fucking country as soon as I can.
 

BenPanced

THE BLUEBERRY QUEEN OF HADES (he/him)
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
17,874
Reaction score
4,667
Location
dunking doughnuts at Dunkin' Donuts
And the next person who claims he's always been an ally and Killary is the one who faked an epiphany to con people out of votes because 45 is the one who's always supported same-sex marriage but $hillary's emails gets punched in the throat.
 

Lyv

I meant to do that.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
4,958
Reaction score
1,934
Location
Outside Boston
Gee, maybe *45 will tweet some specifics later. Like, as has been asked above, what happens to those currently serving. So far, I believe, that's all he's done, just tweet about this. I didn't think I could be angrier or more disgusted, but I guess I can be.

From Joshua Block (@JoshACLU), an ACLU attorney, on Twitter:
If you are a trans service member or reservist please contact me. If you know a trans service member or reservist tell them to contact me.

Any suggestions for activism are welcome.
 

Bongo

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
68
Reaction score
5
Things will get even more interesting if we ever have a draft again.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
A small and petty man does small and petty things. Trump is a small and petty man and for him to do this, particularly when he never served and denigrates those who did, elevates this deed to sheer malice.
 

William Haskins

poet
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
29,114
Reaction score
8,867
Age
58
Website
www.poisonpen.net
A small and petty man does small and petty things. Trump is a small and petty man and for him to do this, particularly when he never served and denigrates those who did, elevates this deed to sheer malice.

nail on the head here. thank you.
 

Myrealana

I aim to misbehave
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
5,425
Reaction score
1,911
Location
Denver, CO
Website
www.badfoodie.com
He is simply disgusting. This is a pressing issue to him?

Every day I think I can't possibly hate him more than I already did, and every day he finds a lower place. Every. Damn. Day.
 

regdog

The Scavengers
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
58,075
Reaction score
21,013
Location
She/Her
15,000 trans men and women are in the US military.

A tweet I love
 
Last edited:

Lyv

I meant to do that.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
4,958
Reaction score
1,934
Location
Outside Boston
John McCain, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, released a statement that includes this gem:
Yet another example of why major policy announcements should not be made via Twitter
 

Teinz

Back at it again.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
2,440
Reaction score
186
Location
My favourite chair by the window.
The man is an asshat. But this move is effective in drawing away attention from the fact that millions of people are about to lose their healthcare. There's method in his asshattery.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Apparently the pentagon was caught unawares by this Pence/Bannon move (Mattis is on vacation; I wonder how much he regrets agreeing to this job) -- and McCain can go fuck himself, as always.
 

TCnKC

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
192
Reaction score
8
Location
On the edge of Imagination
John McCain, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, released a statement that includes this gem:

yet another example of why John McCain is a gutless 'Maverick'

This reads as if he's not against the actual policy, just how it was handled. Of course, he'll probably later give a stern speech about equal rights on the floor that will be applauded by the media, then 2 hours later vote to take away voting rights from transgender individuals. Because that's the kind of 'Maverick' John McCain is
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,525
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
Am I the only one convinced he did not write those tweets? They sound like Pence, and, frankly, they're not deranged enough in construction for DJT to have written them. (Also the lack of ALL CAPS!) So that means this bombshell was planned, and never discussed with military leaders. The trust-circle around Trump is getting smaller and smaller by the day.

I've wondered from the beginning what the military would do when we reached Authoritarian Regime status. We're getting damn close to finding out.
 

William Haskins

poet
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
29,114
Reaction score
8,867
Age
58
Website
www.poisonpen.net
mccain's statement in full:

Jul 26 2017

STATEMENT BY SASC CHAIRMAN JOHN McCAIN ON TRANSGENDER AMERICANS IN THE MILITARY


Washington, D.C. *– U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, released the following statement today on President Trump’s tweet regarding transgender Americans in the military:

“The President’s tweet this morning regarding transgender Americans in the military is yet another example of why major policy announcements should not be made via Twitter.

“The statement was unclear. The Department of Defense has already decided to allow currently-serving transgender individuals to stay in the military, and many are serving honorably today. Any American who meets current medical and readiness standards should be allowed to continue serving. There is no reason to force service members who are able to fight, train, and deploy to leave the military—regardless of their gender identity. We should all be guided by the principle that any American who wants to serve our country and is able to meet the standards should have the opportunity to do so—and should be treated as the patriots they are.

“The Department of Defense is currently conducting a study on the medical obligations it would incur, the impact on military readiness, and related questions associated with the accession of transgender individuals who are not currently serving in uniform and wish to join the military. I do not believe that any new policy decision is appropriate until that study is complete and thoroughly reviewed by the Secretary of Defense, our military leadership, and the Congress.

“The Senate Armed Services Committee will continue to follow closely and conduct oversight on the issue of transgender individuals serving in the military.”
###​

Permalink: https://www.mccain.senate.gov/publi...cain-on-transgender-americans-in-the-military
 

Twick

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
715
Location
Canada
And today is the 69th anniversary of the desegregation of the US military, no less. Classy.

I honestly believe that Bannon has a little calendar. The first attempted ban on Syrian refugees was on Holocaust Remembrance Day.
 

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
7,117
Location
Albany, NY
Can the government take away the right to serve in the military based on discriminatory reasoning?
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Am I the only one convinced he did not write those tweets? They sound like Pence, and, frankly, they're not deranged enough in construction for DJT to have written them. (Also the lack of ALL CAPS!) So that means this bombshell was planned, and never discussed with military leaders. The trust-circle around Trump is getting smaller and smaller by the day.

I've wondered from the beginning what the military would do when we reached Authoritarian Regime status. We're getting damn close to finding out.

Golly, what would make you think it was Pence? Heh.

In 2010, before "don't ask, don't tell" was ended, Pence warned that Obama should keep the policy in place. Pence said the policy had been "a successful compromise" since the 1990s, and that we shouldn't risk the readiness or recruitment of our military in "an effort to advance some liberal domestic social agenda."

Let's not forget (my fave Pence thing of all time), the man is clearly up on current science --


As late as the year 2000, Pence denied that smoking could kill you. "Despite the hysteria from the political class and the media, smoking doesn't kill," he wrote in an op-ed at the time.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Can the government take away the right to serve in the military based on discriminatory reasoning?

The ACLU is going to fight them, but there are problems -- transgender is not a protected class, to begin with. In general, you can discriminate as long as you're not discriminating against a protected class. Also, there's not a right to serve in the military. You can apply, but there's no guarantee anyone will accept you. They have rules, based on many factors.

Then there's the problem that the government kind of has the right to make staffing decisions based on things like readiness and cost and etc., which is how they were able to keep women out of combat for so long. It was bullshit, but they claimed it was based on actual reasons. This is clearly not based on actual reasons any more than that was, and Trump's stated reasons, stuff like cost, are easily disprovable, but I don't think there's any legal remedy for forcing the military to accept people based on 'saying it's X is bullshit,' when there's no compelling mandate in the first place, if you see what I mean.

The Obama-era decision will probably help a fight, as it likely had internal study backing it, but... I don't know there's remedy regardless?
 
Last edited:

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
On this day, July 26, 1948, Harry Truman signed Executive Oder 9981 banning racial segregation in the armed forces.

Today, Donald Trump announced Transgendered Americans who love their country cannot serve in the armed forces, "in any capacity."

The buck stops...somewhere else.
 

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
7,117
Location
Albany, NY
The ACLU is going to fight them, but there are problems -- transgender is not a protected class, to begin with. In general, you can discriminate as long as you're not discriminating against a protected class. Also, there's not a right to serve in the military. You can apply, but there's no guarantee anyone will accept you. They have rules, based on many factors.

Then there's the problem that the government kind of has the right to make staffing decisions based on things like readiness and cost and etc., which is how they were able to keep women out of combat for so long. It was bullshit, but they claimed it was based on actual reasons. This is clearly not based on actual reasons any more than that was, and Trump's stated reasons, stuff like cost, are easily disprovable, but I don't think there's any legal remedy for forcing the military to accept people based on 'saying it's X is bullshit,' when there's no compelling mandate in the first place, if you see what I mean.

The Obama-era decision will probably help a fight, as it likely had internal study backing it, but... I don't know there's remedy regardless?

What about the 15,000 current trans service members? (Number from a tweet I just got from the ACLU) Surely, they might have legal standing?