• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Geology: The massive volcano that scientists can't find

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,773
Reaction score
15,242
Location
Massachusetts
It was the biggest eruption for 700 years but scientists still can't find the volcano responsible.

BBC said:
It was 10 October 1465 – the day of the hotly anticipated wedding of King Alfonso II of Naples. He was set to marry the sophisticated Ippolita Maria Sforza, a noblewoman from Milan, in a lavish ceremony. As she entered the city, the crowds gasped. Before them was a sight so strange and beautiful, it was like nothing they had ever seen before.

Alas, they weren’t staring at the bride to be – they were looking up at the sky. Though it was the middle of the day, the Sun had turned a deep azure, plunging the city into eerie darkness. Rumours began to spread – was it a solar eclipse? As the early dusk lingered on, others suggested it could be a consequence of the weather. After all, they’d had a particularly wet autumn and some claimed they had seen a thick, humid fog rise up into the sky.

This was just the beginning. In the months that followed, European weather went haywire. In Germany, it rained so heavily that corpses surfaced in cemeteries. In the town of Thorn, Poland, the inhabitants took to travelling the streets by boat. In the unrelenting rain, the castle cellars of Teutonic knights were flooded and whole villages were swept away.

Four years later, Europe was hit by a mini ice age. Fish froze in their ponds. Trees failed to blossom and grass didn’t grow. In Bologna, Italy, heavy snow forced locals to travel with their horses and carriages along the frozen waterways.

In fact, what Alfonso’s wedding party witnessed may have been more extraordinary than anyone imagined. Many thousands of miles away in the tropics, a giant volcano was making geological history. This was an eruption so big, it produced an ash cloud which enveloped the Earth and led to the coolest decade for centuries.

The blast itself would have been heard up to 2,000km (1,242 miles) away and created a tsunami which caused devastation hundreds of kilometres away. In terms of scale, it surpassed even the 1815 eruption of Tambora, which unleashed energy equivalent to 2.2 million Little Boy atomic bombs and killed at least 70,000 people. Traces of the eruption have been found from Antarctica to Greenland.

The thing is, scientists can’t find the volcano that did it. What’s going on?

...
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I read this article a couple of days ago. I'm a geologist, and teach Physical Geology at the local university, and I reproduced it as a class handout. Fascinating thing, and a well-written article to boot, much ahead of a lot of the popular science articles I run across (though it was from BBC, so . . . ).

And a very good example of why scientists like science. What we don't know is what fascinates us, and is something not generally understood by the anti-science crowd, who love to point at things we don't know to assert that science is "wrong".

caw
 

ShaunHorton

AW's resident Velociraptor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
3,579
Reaction score
590
Location
Washington State
Website
shaunhorton.blogspot.com
Huh...

Nope, can't find any records of a tsunami that year... which means there wasn't one, it hit an unpopulated area, or there were no survivors.... which doesn't help in any way. :p

Something like that should certainly have left a massive void or crater though. I'm surprised they haven't found anything like that yet.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
It occurs to me that a potential candidate for this eruption is what is now known as Mt. Pinatubo in the Phillippines. It last erupted in 1991, with the biggest volcanic event since Katnai in 1912. There is an excellent NOVA documentary in this event, narrated by Hal Holbrook, titled in typical cheesy NOVA fashion, "In the Path of a Killer Volcano".Major points made in it are that there was no historical memory of Pinatubo ever erupting befdore, but there were immense old pyroclastic deposits all around it, and investigation of those indicated that they were on the order of 500-600 years old. As Pinatubo is on land, it would not have produced a tsunami, but it potentially could have produced a hell of a lot of ash.

caw
 

GeoWriter

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
146
Reaction score
13
It occurs to me that a potential candidate for this eruption is what is now known as Mt. Pinatubo in the Phillippines. It last erupted in 1991, with the biggest volcanic event since Katnai in 1912.
caw

And the Pinatubo eruption was particularly Sulphur-rich--making it a good candidate for an eruption that could make for the extra cold winters worldwide.