Actually, I'm more than a little pleased to hear that. I'd begun to think the breed had vanished, which is not great for people who don't like to go through massive edits twice after the editor wants something completely different from the agent.
So ...
ETA: I'm realizing from subsequent comments that this probably sounded more critical--and in the wrong way--than I meant it. I do have concerns about the possibility of an agent and an editor having different visions for a book, but the thought in my head when I wrote this was from doing an agent search and reading--and to the best of my recollection, it was an agent who stated it--that she had sometimes edited a book and had an editor request to have material that had been taken out replaced or re-written. This struck me as a situation where the book had better have been left to the editor in the first place, and one in which I wouldn't care to find myself.
I think I would be most comfortable doing first edits directly with an editor, but that is a personality thing, and it's not to say that I couldn't work with an editorial agent; just that I have concerns about finding a "good match" twice.