Commutation for Chelsea Manning

KateSmash

this was a triumph
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
2,330
Reaction score
410
President Obama on Tuesday largely commuted the remaining prison sentence of Chelsea Manning, the army intelligence analyst convicted of an enormous 2010 leak that revealed American military and diplomatic activities across the world, disrupted the administration, and made WikiLeaks, the recipient of those disclosures, famous.

The decision by Mr. Obama rescued Ms. Manning, who twice tried to commit suicide last year, from an uncertain future as a transgender woman incarcerated at the male military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. She has been jailed for nearly seven years, and her 35-year sentence was by far the longest punishment ever imposed in the United States for a leak conviction.


Now, under the terms of Mr. Obama’s commutation announced by the White House on Tuesday, Ms. Manning is set to be freed in five months, on May 17 of this year, rather than in 2045.


The commutation also relieved the Department of Defense of the difficult responsibility of her incarceration as she pushes for treatment for her gender dysphoria — including sex reassignment surgery — that the military has no experience providing.

[[SUB]SOURCE[/SUB]]

However one might feel about the leak, I am happy to see her out of a men's facility and hopefully recovering from the trauma that came with it.
 

rugcat

Lost in the Fog
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
16,339
Reaction score
4,110
Location
East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
Website
www.jlevitt.com

Rose_C

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
102
Reaction score
6
Location
Earth
oh wow that is awesome. What she has been through is unconscionable.

What really moved me though was Edward Snowden's plea to Obama on behalf of Chelsea.

Edward Snowden ‏@Snowden Jan 11
Mr. President, if you grant only one act of clemency as you exit the White House, please: free Chelsea Manning. You alone can save her life.
 

kaylim

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Messages
180
Reaction score
20
This needs to happen. I've been following this case for years. Manning was tortured and dehumanized in a brutal way as well as denied basic constitutional rights such as a speedy trial. She has already tried to kill herself more than once and was disgustingly punished for it. Furthermore the leaks had a HUGE impact on how the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were perceived from then on. Many government officials say she cost people's lives, but not a single one has been able to point to some actual evidence.

One of her leaks was a video that Wikileaks titled 'collateral murder' showing a helicopter gunning down civilians, journalists, and people who were trying to get the injured to the hospital. Why was she sent to jail for leaking this but nothing happened to the soldiers committing a war crime? As is typical with the US government's position on whistle blowers hypocrisy, dishonesty, and smear campaigns rule the day.

This is the short version of the video she leaked. WARNING: Not safe for work. Pretty violent. Difficult to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogFZlRiTHuw
 
Last edited:

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
I'm not doing any handstands over Manning's release, but after two suicide attempts it was obvious she was deteriorating in a military prison. Obviously, this president gave that some serious consideration before pardoning Manning, a pardon his Defense Secretary Ash Carter opposed.

So do the Republicans, but while Paul Ryan is calling the decision "outrageous" he's been strangely silent over how Trump said he "loved" WikiLeaks.

Trump to Bill O’Reilly: “Wikileaks is amazing”

The problem is, Bill, I would hammer it, but the press doesn’t pick it up. The press is hardly even talking about Wikileaks. You now that. Wikileaks is amazing. The stuff that’s coming out, it shows she’s a real liar. She said, well, you have to say to the public and you have to say to your donors different things. Okay? The press doesn’t even pick this stuff up. You look at, where are you seeing it? [10/11/16]​
Trump: “Wikileaks, some new stuff, some brutal stuff”

We have all of these new charges, did you see it just came down today? Wikileaks, some new stuff, some brutal stuff. I mean I’d read it to you but to hell with it trust me it’s real bad stuff. The speech transcripts contain scandalous revelations about Hillary Clinton that disqualify her from seeking public office. And she is. [10/10/16]​
Trump says Wikileaks proves Clinton should not “be able to run for president”

No one who supports open borders should be able to run for president because we won’t have a country. And buy the way weeks ago I called out Hillary Clinton for supporting open borders and the media said I was wrong. Now I’ve been proven right. Where is the media rushing to correct these false stories? Because in the Wikileaks it was all about open borders. [10/10/16]​
Trump: “Wikileaks. I love Wikileaks”

Wikileaks, I love Wikileaks. And I said write a couple of them down. Let’s see. During a speech crooked Hillary Clinton, oh she’s crooked folks. She’s crooked as a three-dollar bill. Okay here’s one. Just came out. ‘Lock her up’ is right. [10/10/16]​
Trump: “You see so much from these Wikileaks. You see so much. There’s so much.”

It’s just the latest evidence of the hatred that the Clinton campaign really has for everyday Americans and you see, and you see so much from these Wikileaks. You see so much. There’s so much. [10/11/16]

Trump will doubtlessly hammer Obama for the pardon, but he's got zero credibility on the matter and that goes double for the Republicans.
 

cmhbob

Did...did I do that?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
5,778
Reaction score
4,982
Location
Green Country
Website
www.bobmuellerwriter.com
Manning was not pardoned. Her sentence was commuted to time served, but the court findings still stand. She was still found guilty of some charges, pleaded guilty to others, and still faces a bad conduct discharge from the Army, with all of the side effects that brings.
 

Old Hack

Such a nasty woman
Super Moderator
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
22,454
Reaction score
4,957
Location
In chaos
Here's an interesting sidelight:

https://www.google.com/amp/www.inde...commutation-pardon-clemency-a7532441.html?amp

Will Assange follow through on his promise? I'm not holding my breath.

If I remember correctly, Assange took refuge in the embassy because he didn't want to be extradited to Sweden where he's been charged with rape. He said this was because he was worried Sweden might then extradite him to the USA, where there's the death penalty. But Sweden won't extradite anyone to a country where they might face execution: they would insist on a guarantee that the death penalty would not stand before agreeing to it; and even if that wasn't the case, the USA has not indicated that it would ask for Assange's extradition if he landed in Sweden.

So Assange's whole justification for taking refuge in the embassy is a bit of a red herring, isn't it?

Sorry to veer this threat off-topic. It just seems bizarre to me.

(My son is at university just round the corner from the embassy where Assange is staying. Last year, when we visited him, we took a walk down to Harrods and ended up just outside the Assange balcony. We gave him a wave through the window and he looked terrified, and bolted out of view.)
 

Prince Anpiel

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 5, 2016
Messages
75
Reaction score
4
She deserves a lot more than this. She is a real American hero.
 

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
7,117
Location
Albany, NY
As probably the only person here who actually knows and communicates with Chelsea, I can say with absolute certainty that Obama just saved her life. Maybe, I'll be able to meet her in person one day now. Classy move, Mr. President. My heartfelt thanks and gratitude.
 

DancingMaenid

New kid...seven years ago!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
5,058
Reaction score
460
Location
United States
I was so excited when I heard about this yesterday. I hadn't had a whole lot of hope that Obama would pull through on this, and the fact that he did is a nice ray of hope in an otherwise sad time.

Regardless of what you think of Manning's actions, her punishment has been grossly improportionate and the treatment she's received is appalling.
 

Frankie007

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
696
Reaction score
110
so i looked up Commutation....and the definition basically said "reverse direction" that doesn't make sense here. someone wanna clarify for me? "reverse direction for Chelsea Manning"?
 

Lauram6123

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
417
Location
Northern transplant in the southern US.
so i looked up Commutation....and the definition basically said "reverse direction" that doesn't make sense here. someone wanna clarify for me? "reverse direction for Chelsea Manning"?

From TheFreeDictionary.com

In Criminal Law, commutation is the substitution of a lesser punishment for a greater one. Contrasted with clemency, which is an act of grace eliminating a sentence or punishment, commutation is the modification or reduction of a punishment.
 

cmhbob

Did...did I do that?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
5,778
Reaction score
4,982
Location
Green Country
Website
www.bobmuellerwriter.com
I also note somewhat cynically that Mr. Obama could have signed off on commutation or clemency at any point in the last three-and-a-half years. He could have ordered a halt to the proceedings as CinC. Yet he waited until the final 72 hours of his presidency to do so, and it's being lauded as a classy move.

I'm not bashing him or his decision. I've admitted recently that Mr. Obama's presidency was not as bad as it could have been in many areas. But I'm disappointed at the timing. The first petition was filed September 2013. If it was a good idea now, why wasn't it a good idea then?
 

SWest

In the garden...
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
23,129
Reaction score
12,525
Location
Where the Moon can see me.
Website
www.etsy.com
There's no doubt she did what she did (as a pawn in a much larger game, it turns out). The rest of her consequences stand.

But, considering what she has endured to date, how much more would she suffer under this next administration?
 

MotherOfPoodles

Registered
Joined
Jun 25, 2016
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I also note somewhat cynically that Mr. Obama could have signed off on commutation or clemency at any point in the last three-and-a-half years. He could have ordered a halt to the proceedings as CinC. Yet he waited until the final 72 hours of his presidency to do so, and it's being lauded as a classy move.

I'm not bashing him or his decision. I've admitted recently that Mr. Obama's presidency was not as bad as it could have been in many areas. But I'm disappointed at the timing. The first petition was filed September 2013. If it was a good idea now, why wasn't it a good idea then?

Perhaps because he believes she deserves to pay her debt to society for as long as possible--right up to the point where he can no longer guarantee her continued survival. For example, maybe a little birdie told him Trump wants her tossed into the general population? Is that even possible? I'm asking.
 

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
7,117
Location
Albany, NY
I also note somewhat cynically that Mr. Obama could have signed off on commutation or clemency at any point in the last three-and-a-half years. He could have ordered a halt to the proceedings as CinC. Yet he waited until the final 72 hours of his presidency to do so, and it's being lauded as a classy move.

I'm not bashing him or his decision. I've admitted recently that Mr. Obama's presidency was not as bad as it could have been in many areas. But I'm disappointed at the timing. The first petition was filed September 2013. If it was a good idea now, why wasn't it a good idea then?

One could just as easily ask when didn't Lincoln issue the Emancipation Proclamation on day one of his term. The real answer to your question is that presidents usually wait to commute sentences until there is no political cost to them.
 

KateSmash

this was a triumph
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
2,330
Reaction score
410
Not to him, no. But it certainly would have been used against Hillary Clinton and the Democrats running for Congress. It's sort of a problem when government is played like a team sport.
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,337
Reaction score
16,111
Location
Australia.
I'm disappointed at the timing. The first petition was filed September 2013. If it was a good idea now, why wasn't it a good idea then?
I'll play, since you've assured us you're
not bashing him or his decision.
.

I don't know. Why do you think it wasn't a good idea to do it then?
 
Last edited: