The AW Amazon Store
Buy books by AWers

 

Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein

  1. #1
    figuring it all out
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    56

    Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein

    I just finished reading this book and all I have to say is ... how mediocre. (spoiler alert; btw)

    Maybe it is a generational thing. I know this book came out in the early 1960s and was something of a publishing sensation at the time. But coming from a 26 year old, I just thought the plot was sloppy and sacrificed a creative story for preachy philosophy.

    I actually thought the beginning of the book was pretty good and interesting. It set up the man from mars as someone in need of protection from the government, who was trying to get his fortune, and involved the characters taking risks to keep him safe while he learned about the world around him. There was also things about the "future world" that were kind of interesting at first, especially the world government.

    But after that, the book stopped making sense for me. There didn't seem to be anything at stake. The characters just kind of joined the man from mars' cult of polygamy and sex without much of a fight which baffled me. Then, towards the very end, the book started to get interesting again with people coming after his cult; but its too late cause the books over.

    Maybe I just didn't "grok" the goodness of the book? Anyone else read this?

  2. #2
    Likes metaphors mixed, not stirred Chris P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    15,218
    I read it back in high school and came to about the same conclusion you did. I read it about 30 years ago so it's not generational. I too saw through Heinlein's poorly disguised pontificating through the mouth of Mike. Nobody has ever actually grown up on Mars, so Mike's perspective is still earthly.

    However, I too thought it had a great start. Also, the fact that I only read it once 30 years ago and can still remember enough to talk about it without resorting to Wikipedia says tons about the staying power and memorability, even with its faults.
    Join any time! Take the 2017 AW Reading Challenge. Pick 12 books from a list of topics and read/discuss with us throughout the year.

  3. #3
    figuring it all out
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    56
    I noticed online that a lot of people commented about misogyny in the book, especially Jill's line about 9 out 10 times rape is partly the fault of the woman but that didn't bother me that much (although it did cause me to raise my eyebrows) because there are tons of books, especially old ones, that have a crummy view of women in general. But yeah, its interesting that you came to the same conclusion. I saw reviews saying that this was the best science fiction novel ever written, and I just can't believe that to be true.

  4. #4
    Herder of Hamsters
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    On the Server
    Posts
    11,968
    Quote Originally Posted by kaylim View Post
    I saw reviews saying that this was the best science fiction novel ever written, and I just can't believe that to be true.
    It was certainly influential, but no, it's not the best SF of all time (which, frankly, is pretty stupid categorization since we haven't yet stopped writing SF). It's not even the best Heinlein.

    Heinlein was very much a product of his era (remember that he was born in 1907). He was not a feminist. If I had to pick my favorite Heinlein, I'd pick The Moon is A Harsh Mistress. It suffers from some of the same problems, but I think it is overall a better novel.

  5. #5
    Touch and go robeiae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    on the Seven Bridges Road
    Posts
    46,154
    I prefer Friday, myself. Mostly because I think it has a good number of very perceptive observations. Also The Number of the Beast. Though it is true that sexism is rampant in these, as well, especially the latter.

    As to Stranger in a Strange Land, it was very influential when it came out, to people who were growing up in the late fifties and sixties. It's not so relevant anymore; the story can't and doesn't have the same impact on current readers, I think.
    I put for the general inclination of all mankind, a perpetual and restless desire of power after power, that ceaseth only in death. --Thomas Hobbes

    Quote Originally Posted by CassandraW
    You're a smug, sneering, ranting asshole, and yet even when I despise your position, I like you.
    Quote Originally Posted by swachski
    You're a gentleman and a scholar...
    Learning to run, T'ai Chi style--blogging about running and Eastern philosophy
    Ponds of Happenstance--blogging about politics, economics, and history
    Sailor on the Ponds--tweeting about everything


    I, Westworld: player pianos and the human condition

  6. #6
    blue eyed floozy shakeysix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    St. John, Kansas
    Posts
    9,814
    I started Heinlein early--I think "The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathon Hoag" was the first. I was an advanced reader early in the game but I was young for that one. I remember that I did like it but getting through it was not easy. Glory Road and Star Beast were some of the first. I liked them and the Moon is a Harsh Mistress, too. I think about 7th grade I read Methuselah's Children. By that time I was beginning to catch on to authors instead of books. Andre Norton had been my favorite but Bradbury took her place, I want to guess about 8th grade. Let's just say that a Bradbury paperback cost .39 cents when I started reading him.

    Podkayne was my favorite Heinlein character. I liked Clark too, but Uncle Tom was getting a little creepy. I read Stranger at 14 or 15. I thought it was great but Jubal was getting a little creepy. By Farnham's Freehold I had enough preaching and turned back to Bradbury. It seemed to me that Bradbury stood up better with less bluster. By 12th grade I was out of Science Fiction and into Somerset Maugham. Now I read only non-fiction but still have a soft spot for Andre Norton. Not so Heinlein, when I outgrew him I never wanted to go back. . --s6

  7. #7
    figuring it all out
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    72
    It might be a Heinlein thing. I tried to read Starship Troopers and could not quite finish it. He had this habit of stopping the story so he could discuss 'history and moral philosophy' every time he did i lost a little more interest in the story until it finally gave out, like 9/10's of the way through it. So it might just be his way...

    On the other hand I read Starbeast and Red Planet and i loved both of those! then again they were meant for a younger audience so try those and see what you think.
    "If you have a little voice in your head that talks to you, don't worry your human. If you have three or four voices that argue with each other, don't worry your a writer!"

  8. #8
    practical experience, FTW talktidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    S Wales, UK
    Posts
    223
    No way is Stranger the greatest SF novel ever written. I tend to think reviews like that come from those who have not read widely.

    I always had a soft spot for Space Cadet and Space Family Stone, if I remember that latter title correctly.

  9. #9
    has no socks JulianneQJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,465
    I do not think Stranger is the greatest SF novel, I don't even think it's the greatest Heinlein novel. There are quite a few Heinleins that I love. Yes, he was a product of the culture of his time, and women didn't have much in the way of rights at that time. For the most part, I'm able to forgive that for a writer of that era, while I wouldn't for someone writing today.

    I never understood why Stranger was singled out. I prefer The Starbeast, Friday, The Cat Who Walks Through Walls, I Shall Fear No Evil, and Job. I also enjoy many of his later books, though they do get rather infested with incest. I adore Time Enough for Love. I suppose I always viewed them differently than some do. I see those books as being written about a futuristic culture that has different morals than I, rather than an advertisement for incest.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Custom Search