- Joined
- Sep 27, 2016
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm writing a biography of a World War One pilot who's very little known - and as a result it's turning just as much into a narrative and explorative history of Britain's Royal Flying Corps because there are so few original sources and ego documents that mention him specifically.
My problem is this: say I've described an event that it's inconcievable he wouldn't have been close to, known of or talked about with his mates. Without a definitive source, how do I handle this?
Writing "this may have been a cause for sobering conversations in the officer's mess that night" just seems a bit wishy washy. Do I just mention the incident and how close my subject was to it and let the reader make that connection? Or do I, in the interests of historical rigour, omit it completely?
Any thoughts would be very welcome.
Many thanks
Aunt Lil
My problem is this: say I've described an event that it's inconcievable he wouldn't have been close to, known of or talked about with his mates. Without a definitive source, how do I handle this?
Writing "this may have been a cause for sobering conversations in the officer's mess that night" just seems a bit wishy washy. Do I just mention the incident and how close my subject was to it and let the reader make that connection? Or do I, in the interests of historical rigour, omit it completely?
Any thoughts would be very welcome.
Many thanks
Aunt Lil