Grammar checkers aren't all that useful for native speakers writing fiction, drama or poetry.
Depends on how good one is at the language they're native in. Individuals with dyslexia, for example, could probably benefit a lot from a grammar checker.
Grammar checkers aren't all that useful for native speakers writing fiction, drama or poetry.
I often have grammar checkers mark correct words as wrong. The most recent example to come to mind is loveable; while less common than lovable, it is technically correct. And apparently absolutewrite's spellcheck thinks it's wrong as well.I've never used one that has been much help to me for actual punctuation, at least. I've had grammar programs tell me something correct is incorrect far more often than I've had them spot mistakes or omissions on my part. Spell checkers are another matter entirely for me, but I have the auto correct turned off, because spell checkers often suggest the wrong word. It's almost as maddening as texting with the word selection feature enabled. I've written texts that are incomprehensible, because so many of the words the program chooses are not the ones I intended.
Some grammar checkers can be handy for spotting things like repeated or overused words, but again, they can't tell when someone is doing something for the sake of rhythm, voice or flow. They are not substitutes for human eyes (or brains).
I always wonder why writers don't take the obvious road, see the obvious solution. Sit down and learn grammar. This should be done before you write word one. But it has to be done at some point, or you simply will not be able to write as well as you should, even if you have a boatload of talent.
Do you use editing software...?
Nope. I use editing wetware. Software didn't exist when I started editing and, as far as I've seen, software doesn't exist that can do anything but follow rules. Good writers break the rules because they know why the rules don't apply to that particular situation.
Which actually brings up another point that bothers me some: I wonder if the fascination/dependence on computer software doesn't inhibit some writers from actually learning how to edit and what to watch for in writing. Seriously, every writer will be a better writer by learning how to edit using the brain, regardless of what software crutches may be available.
caw