10,000 Refugee Children Missing - Europol

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
Many children emigrate alone. And many are unaccounted for.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/30/fears-for-missing-child-refugees

At least 10,000 unaccompanied child refugees have disappeared after arriving in Europe, according to the EU’s criminal intelligence agency. Many are feared to have fallen into the hands of organised trafficking syndicates.

In the first attempt by law enforcement agencies to quantify one of the most worrying aspects of the migrant crisis, Europol’s chief of staff told the Observer that thousands of vulnerable minors had vanished after registering with state authorities.


Brian Donald said 5,000 children had disappeared in Italy alone, while another 1,000 were unaccounted for in Sweden. He warned that a sophisticated pan-European “criminal infrastructure” was now targeting refugees. “It’s not unreasonable to say that we’re looking at 10,000-plus children. Not all of them will be criminally exploited; some might have been passed on to family members. We just don’t know where they are, what they’re doing or whom they are with.”


I don't think a very high percentage of these can have been "passed on to family members." I doubt if that many of them have family members in stable circumstances, in Europe. Some, but not many.
 
Last edited:

regdog

The Scavengers
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
58,075
Reaction score
21,013
Location
She/Her
I don't think many have ended up with family either.
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
That wry joke "won't somebody think of the children" isn't real funny right now.

This, and the Boko Haram atrocities, and the children imprisoned in Australia -- not to mention last year's flood of unaccompanied child migrants from Central and South America northward to the States here -- it says something about what we think of our children, as a world.... or maybe, as a First World of privilege....

It's hard to fathom the extent of this. What does it mean when a species disregards its offspring to this extent? A species that in healthy circumstances cares for its offspring for close to two decades of life? Or, even when great numbers of parents believe the best way to care for their offspring is to send them off into the world alone in hope they will find a better life?
 
Last edited:

Cyia

Rewriting My Destiny
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
18,645
Reaction score
4,100
Location
Brillig in the slithy toves...
10,000. The population of a small town. Three times the population of the one in which I currently live.

It's definitely possible that some of these kids have made it to relatives or friends, and it's possible that some have simply fallen off the radar because they're too young to know what they should do to get help, some may have kept travelling after registering, but knowing the percentages as they apply to unaccompanied minors who try and cross the US border, those are not good numbers.
 

Xelebes

Delerium ex Ennui
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
14,205
Reaction score
884
Location
Edmonton, Canada
IT actually says quite a bit of the species resilience. When offspring die quickly, it promotes the mature specimens' fecundity. This is what is beginning to be recognised in the wild. Since humans hunt adults and not children, it suppresses the prey species into a more docile and less fecund form, eventually changing the species altogether (see the difference between the auroch and the cow.) In the first world, we do not have high infant mortality so we opt to have less children. This results in much more concern for each and every child.
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
Well, I am not sure we WANT to promote human fecundity. And, does it indicate species reslience when a species rather suddenly turns a high number of its offspring into shark food or the equivalent?

Though I will say, your point of view has a comforting quality, in a way....But it doesn't follow upon the actual facts, that I can see. :)
 

Xelebes

Delerium ex Ennui
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
14,205
Reaction score
884
Location
Edmonton, Canada
There is pressures all around. A die off does not indicate that a species is not resilient. It has just demonstrated that it has become too large for the environment. When the environment can handle more, growth returns.

Right now, there is a margin that is being exploited to further the growth. Parents sending off their children with abandon to people who care much more for the welfare and the prolonging of the life of their children.
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
Parents sending off their children with abandon to people who care much more for the welfare and the prolonging of the life of their children.

They -- and we -- hope.

I get your point, Xelebes. It still doesn't feel right or good.
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,336
Reaction score
16,110
Location
Australia.
There is pressures all around. A die off does not indicate that a species is not resilient. It has just demonstrated that it has become too large for the environment. When the environment can handle more, growth returns.

Right now, there is a margin that is being exploited to further the growth. Parents sending off their children with abandon to people who care much more for the welfare and the prolonging of the life of their children.
Are we still talking about refugee children? Because I'm not sure that that's how it happens. For the most part, it's parents in desperate straits, sending their children away in the hope they will live.
 
Last edited:

Xelebes

Delerium ex Ennui
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
14,205
Reaction score
884
Location
Edmonton, Canada
Are we still talking about refugee children? Because I'm not sure that that's how it happens.

I was including the children being sent on trains from Central and South America. It is less so when we speak of the refugee children. My post was largely addressing the expansion of the topic at hand by Kylabelle.
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
Well, I think the parents in Central and South America were/are also in quite desperate straits, possibly somewhat less desperate but not by much. And most of them did and do NOT know where their children will end up, nor to whom their care will be given. The whole damn thing is desperate.

And some of the children, in both situations, have already lost their families and are setting out on their own. None of it is a pretty picture, at all.
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
A third of migrants sailing to Greece are children:

Children now make up over a third of the migrants making the perilous sea crossing from Turkey to Greece, the UN said Tuesday, as two more babies drowned off Europe's shores.
For the first time since the start of the migrant crisis in Europe, there are also now more women and children crossing the border from Greece to Macedonia than adult males, according to UN children's agency UNICEF.