- Joined
- Nov 10, 2009
- Messages
- 10,361
- Reaction score
- 1,032
- Location
- In your mind
- Website
- maxoneverything.wordpress.com
I found this article fascinating.
http://www.wired.com/2015/10/how-bl...to-fight-the-power?mbid=social_cp_twitter_tny
There's often a sneering contempt for users of social media. It is expressed by journalists, pundits, and politicians. Just a week or two ago David Cameron, Britain's Prime Minister, said "Twitter is not Britain". He's quite right in that. But it doesn't need to be. Unlike in the 1960s, people carry WATS with them. They have many, many WATSes.
It's in part what is fueling Bernie Sanders campaign. It was a fundamental feature of Jeremy Corbyn's campaign. And it was a fundamental feature of the Scottish independence referendum campaign. Wherever you look, whether it's Syriza in Greece, the Occupy movement in the noughties, social media is there. Until now, social media has been largely ineffectual, but I'd say that during the last year it has shown its claws.
So, therefore this article is really interesting. Maybe you'll think so too.
http://www.wired.com/2015/10/how-bl...to-fight-the-power?mbid=social_cp_twitter_tny
In the 1960s, if you were a civil rights worker stationed in the Deep South and you needed to get some urgent news out to the rest of the world—word of a beating or an activist’s arrest or some brewing state of danger—you would likely head straight for a telephone.
From an office or a phone booth in hostile territory, you would place a call to one of the major national civil rights organizations. But you wouldn’t do it by dialing a standard long-distance number. That would involve speaking first to a switchboard operator—who was bound to be white and who might block your call. Instead you’d dial the number for something called a Wide Area Telephone Service, or WATS, line.
Like an 800 line, you could dial a WATS number from anywhere in the region and the call would patch directly through to the business or organization that paid for the line—in this case, say, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.
On the other end of the line, another civil rights worker would be ready to take down your report and all the others pouring in from phones scattered across the South. The terse, action-packed write-ups would then be compiled into mimeographed “WATS reports” mailed out to organization leaders, the media, the Justice Department, lawyers, and other friends of the movement across the country.
In other words, it took a lot of infrastructure to live-tweet what was going on in the streets of the Jim Crow South
There's often a sneering contempt for users of social media. It is expressed by journalists, pundits, and politicians. Just a week or two ago David Cameron, Britain's Prime Minister, said "Twitter is not Britain". He's quite right in that. But it doesn't need to be. Unlike in the 1960s, people carry WATS with them. They have many, many WATSes.
It's in part what is fueling Bernie Sanders campaign. It was a fundamental feature of Jeremy Corbyn's campaign. And it was a fundamental feature of the Scottish independence referendum campaign. Wherever you look, whether it's Syriza in Greece, the Occupy movement in the noughties, social media is there. Until now, social media has been largely ineffectual, but I'd say that during the last year it has shown its claws.
So, therefore this article is really interesting. Maybe you'll think so too.
Last edited: