Thing that gets to me on Amazon review system is that you submit it, and in theory it is checked before it is posted - as in there is a delay before it is posted. They could at least have an auto-check on some words like "shipping" so that some of the irrelevant reviews on books are flagged up and a human can check and ask for a modification.
For reviews of traders using amazon, there are all sorts of categories about packaging, delivery times etc, which weeds out some of those comments from the information in the text box. It would be helpful if they'd add those features to book reviews, so that people could be guided a bit. I did suggest it to them a while back and heard nothing......
Other than that - book reviews - I see quite a few people in general, not just this thread, saying they don't trust 5 star reviews. Hhm. My take on the start rating is "did I really enjoy this" and "is it as good as it can be for its type". So I do give five star reviews - not because it is the best book this year, but because I just had a lot of fun reading it and it was very good for its type. A lighthearted ghost/murder/romance story is not great literature (well, not classified as such yet anyway - in a 100 years it may be regarded as a classic) but is a pleasant way to spend a few hours of relaxation. Not challenging and brain stretching, "just" entertaining. Is it at the top of the game for such books? Yes. Then give it five stars. And I do tend to say things like that in my reviews. Also try and give three or four reasons why I liked it - such as very well researched historical background.
For reviews of traders using amazon, there are all sorts of categories about packaging, delivery times etc, which weeds out some of those comments from the information in the text box. It would be helpful if they'd add those features to book reviews, so that people could be guided a bit. I did suggest it to them a while back and heard nothing......
Other than that - book reviews - I see quite a few people in general, not just this thread, saying they don't trust 5 star reviews. Hhm. My take on the start rating is "did I really enjoy this" and "is it as good as it can be for its type". So I do give five star reviews - not because it is the best book this year, but because I just had a lot of fun reading it and it was very good for its type. A lighthearted ghost/murder/romance story is not great literature (well, not classified as such yet anyway - in a 100 years it may be regarded as a classic) but is a pleasant way to spend a few hours of relaxation. Not challenging and brain stretching, "just" entertaining. Is it at the top of the game for such books? Yes. Then give it five stars. And I do tend to say things like that in my reviews. Also try and give three or four reasons why I liked it - such as very well researched historical background.
Last edited: