My work is simultaneously over-written and under-written. Sort of true. It's hard to explain.
There's always a whole lot of pointless chatter and going from place to place that really should be cut, but at the same time not much of the underlying idea seems to make it onto the page. I write the little moments of characterisation and the biggest moments of 'save the world', but I feel like it all happens in a void. I'm writing all the wrong bits and so I end up with a novel-length draft that's mostly filler, but seems to cover the events of an entire series.
So I think what I'm saying is that the story is sort of missing the middle layer? Does that make sense? It's like I'm sort of skimming over the important events rather than digging right into them.
For my current WIP (on its third draft), I have a synopsis that explains how the new version of the story is supposed to go. Trying to jump from that to what actually needs to change on a scene-by-scene basis... not really happening. I just don't seem to be able to connect the idea with the characters.
My idea is that I should be able to go from a synopsis that explains my new vision for the story to shifting the story into the right shapes, but there's a whole set of between synopsis and new draft that I haven't managed to pick up. I'm starting to think I'm just not smart enough or not educated enough to be able to put together a proper novel. How come 'fix the biggest problems first' seems to be such an easy thing for everyone else? They make it sound like you just read through the draft and make a neat little list of bullet points, only when I try that I just get a pile of vague impressions of wrongness.
Yeah... I don't know. I'm trying to be more specific than 'my story sucks and I can't follow any of these 'how to edit' methods the internet talks about', but I think I've just waffled around and I only really need this last bit.
Siana, confused.
There's always a whole lot of pointless chatter and going from place to place that really should be cut, but at the same time not much of the underlying idea seems to make it onto the page. I write the little moments of characterisation and the biggest moments of 'save the world', but I feel like it all happens in a void. I'm writing all the wrong bits and so I end up with a novel-length draft that's mostly filler, but seems to cover the events of an entire series.
So I think what I'm saying is that the story is sort of missing the middle layer? Does that make sense? It's like I'm sort of skimming over the important events rather than digging right into them.
For my current WIP (on its third draft), I have a synopsis that explains how the new version of the story is supposed to go. Trying to jump from that to what actually needs to change on a scene-by-scene basis... not really happening. I just don't seem to be able to connect the idea with the characters.
My idea is that I should be able to go from a synopsis that explains my new vision for the story to shifting the story into the right shapes, but there's a whole set of between synopsis and new draft that I haven't managed to pick up. I'm starting to think I'm just not smart enough or not educated enough to be able to put together a proper novel. How come 'fix the biggest problems first' seems to be such an easy thing for everyone else? They make it sound like you just read through the draft and make a neat little list of bullet points, only when I try that I just get a pile of vague impressions of wrongness.
Yeah... I don't know. I'm trying to be more specific than 'my story sucks and I can't follow any of these 'how to edit' methods the internet talks about', but I think I've just waffled around and I only really need this last bit.
Siana, confused.