- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,133
- Reaction score
- 75
- Location
- Bremen, Germany
- Website
- www.dreadfulgate.de
Yeah, I hear ya.
That's why I thought of Buffy in the previous post. I remember first watching it in '99 or so and thinking, this is the kind of female-driven show I'd have loved as a kid*. As opposed to the one female-led action show I remember from then, Charlie's Angels. Buffy filled a very distinct hole in the cultural ladscape as I knew it at the time.
There was a survey some time in the 70's that showed boys were less likely to identify with male heroes than females. A lot of publishers took that into their stride and just stopped pushing female characters altogether. (I forgot where I read about that and if it was a European or American study, sorry.) I was a kid in the Seventies, and I would have told them the same, mostly because the contemporary female characters I knew at the time mostly sucked. I wanted confident heroes, and that niche was mostly covered by guys. (And it wasn't about gender at all for me, at least consciously. I loved Miss Marple for exactly that quality. And Harriet the Spy. Peppermint Patty. Emma Peel. But they were all pre-70s, and even so few and far between.)
*) Well, except for the Angel romance sub-plot. I'm still not shipping for that.
That's why I thought of Buffy in the previous post. I remember first watching it in '99 or so and thinking, this is the kind of female-driven show I'd have loved as a kid*. As opposed to the one female-led action show I remember from then, Charlie's Angels. Buffy filled a very distinct hole in the cultural ladscape as I knew it at the time.
There was a survey some time in the 70's that showed boys were less likely to identify with male heroes than females. A lot of publishers took that into their stride and just stopped pushing female characters altogether. (I forgot where I read about that and if it was a European or American study, sorry.) I was a kid in the Seventies, and I would have told them the same, mostly because the contemporary female characters I knew at the time mostly sucked. I wanted confident heroes, and that niche was mostly covered by guys. (And it wasn't about gender at all for me, at least consciously. I loved Miss Marple for exactly that quality. And Harriet the Spy. Peppermint Patty. Emma Peel. But they were all pre-70s, and even so few and far between.)
*) Well, except for the Angel romance sub-plot. I'm still not shipping for that.