Can I rant? This new "diversity" standard in Kirkus is making me see rage spots. Now, I am not saying that we shouldn't be promoting diverse books. OF COURSE we should. But while I think a few reviews have done this elegantly, 90% of the other reviews have been painfully clunky. I don't know if anyone else feels this way, but when I go to Kirkus, I want to read a review. This forced structure does make me feel like, instead of reading anything about the actual quality, too often I'm in fact reading some "top trumps" scale of how the book measures up to an ideological standard.
Like…when appropriate, I 100% believe that we should talk about representation. Like it bugs me so, so much when the YA protag is really insistently white but has "diverse" heritage (example: M@ra Dyer). It's not to do with the "agenda" that Kirkus wishes to uphold (can't think of a better word), but with the sense of arbitrary measuring of the book against those qualities. I'm really not sure that Kirkus is the proper forum for that discussion. If nothing else, I think it's unfair on the writer, to some extent, because Kirkuses reviews are always very short. Plus, the standard seems to (unsurprisingly) favour certain types of diversity - namely race and, to a lesser extent, sexuality. I've never seen someone mention "able-bodied" for instance (is physically disabled, has an agenda of her own ). Also, like, it doesn't seem to matter that Adam Silvera is a PoC while the Kirkus reviewers are listing off the races of his characters? That is, I guess, personal, because even though I'm physically disabled, I have no interest in writing physically disabled protags because, for better or worse, I don't want to be found out as the "disabled writer writing about disability." I can't figure out if it's the "being told" thing that I'm not used to, or if I dislike it because it's just poor writing.
I'm completely happy to be told I'm wrong, btw.
I agree with you. I just had a quick look over a few Kirkus reviews and I agree that it's clunky writing. There's a prominent Goodreads reviewer (it doesn't really matter who she is, just that she's "big" enough that I see her reviews on first pages of reviews for a lot of YA books) who has a list where she tallies all the diversity points a book has. Like, here's what she wrote for one review:
Diversity Rating: 0 – What Diversity?
Racial-Ethnic: 0
QUILTBAG: 0
Disability: 0
Intersectionality: 0
So this is at the top of her review, just after the "Full review on my blog! I received an ARC from the publisher!" So at first glance, to someone who isn't looking super carefully, this looks like she's absolutely panning this book... but it's a very positive review. I don't know, I'm all for people finding books about people like themselves/people they want to read about, but this feels... I mean, this book in question is set in the early Middle Ages in Southern France. It's not exactly going to be a cornucopia of diversity in that setting, not like a modern NYC setting would be. I don't know. *Shrug*
HOWEVER! Fuck Voya. Holy shit, of course I picked the day to do this that Voya is blowing up their own paper. But, yeah, fuck them.
YEAH that's unreal! Tr1st1na Wr1ght is in my debut group and we've been talking about this all day. SO disheartening. Their shitty response is much worse than the original offending line in the review, IMO.