Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

View Poll Results: Who will be the next Speaker of the House?

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • Boehner

    3 50.00%
  • Cantor

    1 16.67%
  • Pelosi

    0 0%
  • Another Republican (comment below)

    1 16.67%
  • Another Democrat (comment below)

    0 0%
  • Bloom

    1 16.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: Speaker of the House for 113th Congress

  1. #1
    Writing Anarchist DeleyanLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    lost among the words
    Posts
    30,501

    Speaker of the House for 113th Congress

    Who do you think will become the next House Speaker?

    Poll to follow momentarily
    My blog: Myth Mugger


    Flamechild, the first anthology in the Children of the Vortex series, is now available here.
    Stonechild is a free intro story to the Children of the Vortex series, now available here

    Info on my avatar


  2. #2
    Life is good Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In my house on the river
    Posts
    2,954
    Boehner will probably keep the position...due to the good old boy system
    Cantor has little appeal.
    Ryan would be a good alternative, but I doubt he will make the challenge.

    Result: no change

    But I wouldn't bet the farm on it.
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
    James Madison, The Federalist No. 45


    "Beware the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry."
    Thomas Paine


  3. #3
    That hairy-handed gent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Who ran amok in Kent
    Posts
    31,531
    Boehner will continue. But there are some bruises. Eric Cantor is transparently ambitious for the job, and I don't think he has much beyond personal gratification involved. He'll shove Boehner onto the subway tracks at the first opportunity. But that won't be this session. Cantor took a hit on the fiscal-cliff vote, and is in no position to contest the Speaker job right now. Nor is anybody else.

    Two years from now, who knows? The GOP is in a state of schism at the moment, and how they shake that out over the next term is at the moment indecipherable. Right now, Obama's approval rating is the highest it's been since shortly after his first election, and the approval rating of Congress is as deep in the toilet as I've ever seen it. The House Republican leadership has a tankerload of background work to do to improve that situation.

    caw
    "Badger! Badger! The weasels have stolen my motor-car!"

    "Frankly, Toad, I don't give a damn."

    -- Gone with the Wind in the Willows

  4. #4
    34 Years of Black-On-Black Love nighttimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    A Cowtown. With Real Cows.
    Posts
    8,298

    Talking A Man in WAY Over His Head

    The Boner is the weakest, most ineffectual,impotent Speaker of the House in decades. Rarely do you see a Speaker who can neither control his caucus or his lieutenants on key votes, but Boehner gets punk'd by his own team so often even die-hard Democrats have to feel a little sorry for him.

    When they're not laughing their asses off, that is.

    He will probably get through the vote with his position, but can anyone tell me why Boehner wants the continued humiliation?

    No wonder he's running around telling Harry Reid to "go fuck yourself." The poor dear is under stress. He's probably lighting up an entire pack of cigarettes and smoking them at the same time.

    Trying to lead a GOP filled with flakes, nuts, bomb-throwers and radicals is like herding cats. It can be done, but what exactly have you accomplished?

    I probably should stop calling John Boehner "the Boner" when "noodle dick" seems so much more accurate.
    I would liken you
    To a night without stars
    Were it not for your eyes.
    I would liken you
    To a sleep without dreams
    Were it not for your songs.


    ~ “Ardella” by Langston Hughes


    Unapologetic. Vainglorious. Multifarious. Just Audacious. @
    The Domino Theory



  5. #5
    That hairy-handed gent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Who ran amok in Kent
    Posts
    31,531
    Quote Originally Posted by nighttimer View Post
    The Boner is the weakest, most ineffectual,impotent Speaker of the House in decades.
    How soon you forget: Dennis Hastert.

    caw
    "Badger! Badger! The weasels have stolen my motor-car!"

    "Frankly, Toad, I don't give a damn."

    -- Gone with the Wind in the Willows

  6. #6
    34 Years of Black-On-Black Love nighttimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    A Cowtown. With Real Cows.
    Posts
    8,298
    Quote Originally Posted by blacbird View Post
    How soon you forget: Dennis Hastert.

    caw
    Who?

    Hasn't everyone forgotten Denny Hastert?
    I would liken you
    To a night without stars
    Were it not for your eyes.
    I would liken you
    To a sleep without dreams
    Were it not for your songs.


    ~ “Ardella” by Langston Hughes


    Unapologetic. Vainglorious. Multifarious. Just Audacious. @
    The Domino Theory



  7. #7
    Super Moderator SuperModerator Cranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,941
    Looks like Boehner has kept his seat.
    W.S.F.A. today! (Write Something F***ing Awesome)

    An exceptional poem that you really should read, by AW's own William Haskins:


    Thorn Forest: A Poem In Progress

  8. #8
    Lost in the Fog rugcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
    Posts
    14,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Cranky View Post
    Looks like Boehner has kept his seat.
    Georgia Republican Rep. Paul Broun and Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert nominated former Rep. Allen West of Florida, prompting Democrats to respond with laughter on the other side of the aisle
    .
    Urban Fantasy rules:Play Dead My Website

  9. #9
    Life is good Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In my house on the river
    Posts
    2,954
    Amazingly, the Speaker doesn't have to be a Member of Congress.

    12 Republicans voted for someone other than Boehner. I wonder what kind of committee assignments they'll (not) get.
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
    James Madison, The Federalist No. 45


    "Beware the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry."
    Thomas Paine


  10. #10
    Represent.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    6,778
    On the bright side, Gohmert continues to be a voice of absurdity.
    NaNoWriMo:
    The Forest of Oblivion 51,077/50,000
    Finished!

  11. #11
    Lost in the Fog rugcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
    Posts
    14,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    Amazingly, the Speaker doesn't have to be a Member of Congress.
    I did not know that. Learned something new.
    Urban Fantasy rules:Play Dead My Website

  12. #12
    no, YOU shut up. Absolute Sage William Haskins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    elsewhere
    Posts
    26,842
    the republicans have yet to hit rock bottom, so it was a bit too high an expectation that they might make any bold change.

    boehner will further exacerbate the political division in washington and look like an oaf doing it. that much is assured.

    also assured, of course, is that some silly liberals will continue to refer to him as "boner."

  13. #13
    Lost in the Fog rugcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
    Posts
    14,038
    Quote Originally Posted by William Haskins View Post
    boehner will further exacerbate the political division in washington and look like an oaf doing it. that much is assured.
    I think Boehner is in an impossible situation. I don't think anyone the GOP installed as speaker would be any better.

    The far right minority of the GOP, some 70 or 80 members, have decided they have no interest in governing, and absolutely no intention of compromising on anything. They consider compromise a betrayal and moral failing, and (imo) believe they have God and the right on their side and are the only ones who possess truth and wisdom.

    Sure, everybody feels that way to some extent, but they take it to a degree that resembles religious fanaticism. They are constitutionally incapable of doing the business of government, which is no surprise since they despise it so.

    Boehner cannot control them and thus cannot even negotiate any more, since he cannot deliver on an agreed bargain.

    I would actually feel sorry for Boehner if he were a different man.

    (Somebody else said that; I don't remember who.)
    Urban Fantasy rules:Play Dead My Website

  14. #14
    Is me. Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas, usually
    Posts
    8,941
    Pelosi was on NPR tonight saying that it was hard to negotiate with the Republicans right now largely because so many of them were anti-government. When you elect people who do not believe in government and want to cut large bits out of it, those people are less interested in making sure that the government runs smoothly. They actually see government shut downs, automatic cuts, and the neutering or outright closing of various programs as desirable outcomes.

    How do you negotiate with that?
    ---------------------

    Website where you can get sculptures made of your (or your child's) drawings.

    My favorite indie musician could use some support.

  15. #15
    That hairy-handed gent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Who ran amok in Kent
    Posts
    31,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey View Post
    Pelosi was on NPR tonight saying that it was hard to negotiate with the Republicans right now largely because so many of them were anti-government. When you elect people who do not believe in government and want to cut large bits out of it, those people are less interested in making sure that the government runs smoothly. They actually see government shut downs, automatic cuts, and the neutering or outright closing of various programs as desirable outcomes.
    Here's what I don't understand: Why, if these people are so opposed to "government", do they so desperately want to be part of it? The "Tea Party" may have generated some new adherents to this mantra, but people like California Congressman Darrell Issa have made entire governmental careers out of being opposed to "government."

    caw
    "Badger! Badger! The weasels have stolen my motor-car!"

    "Frankly, Toad, I don't give a damn."

    -- Gone with the Wind in the Willows

  16. #16
    Is me. Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas, usually
    Posts
    8,941
    From what I can tell, they want to be a part of it precisely so they can hinder it, neuter it, and shrink it as much as possible. Remember the Republican primary debates? Each of them talked big about what parts of government they'd just close down altogether: stuff like the Department of Education. Cause, yanno, fuck free public K-12 education. Let the free market and the religious groups handle it.

    Or something.
    ---------------------

    Website where you can get sculptures made of your (or your child's) drawings.

    My favorite indie musician could use some support.

  17. #17
    Life is good Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In my house on the river
    Posts
    2,954
    I don't think the GOP or the Tea Party is "anti-government".
    More likely, they want the Federal government to adhere to the enumerated powers as written in Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution.


    http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
    James Madison, The Federalist No. 45


    "Beware the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry."
    Thomas Paine


  18. #18
    That hairy-handed gent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Who ran amok in Kent
    Posts
    31,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    I don't think the GOP or the Tea Party is "anti-government".
    Ask 'em. See what they say.

    caw
    "Badger! Badger! The weasels have stolen my motor-car!"

    "Frankly, Toad, I don't give a damn."

    -- Gone with the Wind in the Willows

  19. #19
    Represent.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    6,778
    That is not the end-all and be-all of the Constitution. There have been 27 amendments since then, some of them greatly expanding the role of the federal government well beyond Article 1, Section 8.
    NaNoWriMo:
    The Forest of Oblivion 51,077/50,000
    Finished!

  20. #20
    That hairy-handed gent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Who ran amok in Kent
    Posts
    31,531
    Quote Originally Posted by clintl View Post
    That is not the end-all and be-all of the Constitution.
    Nor was it ever, in the minds of the Founding Dads, the intent of the Constitution. Which is precisely why they included the provision for amendment, and made that process arduous. And a Supreme Court, a non-elected judicial body designed explicitly to pass judgment on Constitutional issues. They wanted the Constitution to be a document of principles guiding the new Republic as it aged into a future unpredictable, but not transparently and ephemerally easy to alter. They never intended it to be an unalterable stone monument to their greatness.

    caw
    "Badger! Badger! The weasels have stolen my motor-car!"

    "Frankly, Toad, I don't give a damn."

    -- Gone with the Wind in the Willows

  21. #21
    34 Years of Black-On-Black Love nighttimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    A Cowtown. With Real Cows.
    Posts
    8,298

    Thumbs down Hell With 'Em If They Can't Take a Joke. Or A Boner.

    Quote Originally Posted by William Haskins View Post
    the republicans have yet to hit rock bottom, so it was a bit too high an expectation that they might make any bold change.

    boehner will further exacerbate the political division in washington and look like an oaf doing it. that much is assured.

    also assured, of course, is that some silly liberals will continue to refer to him as "boner."
    Also assured, of course, is that some cranky conservatives will continue to take offense to referring to him as "boner."

    Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner.
    Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner. Boner.
    BONER.







    "When you begin to go out there and ask people to vote for you, they're probably not going to vote for you if they can't say your name. You know, my name looks like Beener, Bonner, Boner. Thank God it's not Weiner."

    ~ Speaker of the House John Boehner Boner, Ohio State University commencement speech, 6/15/11

  22. #22

  23. #23
    Super Moderator SuperModerator Cranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,941
    Gah. *hides stinking horse corpse in cellar*

    Anyhoooooooo --

    Re-electing Boehner seems like a weird choice, considering. OTOH, it's vastly preferable to Cantor, IMO. I am hopeful he wasn't re-elected to keep late-night (and thread) comedians in plentiful joke supply. Though I am not sure what else he's going to be able to accomplish. Most things seem to happen despite him, rather than because of him.
    W.S.F.A. today! (Write Something F***ing Awesome)

    An exceptional poem that you really should read, by AW's own William Haskins:


    Thorn Forest: A Poem In Progress

  24. #24
    Life is good Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In my house on the river
    Posts
    2,954
    Quote Originally Posted by clintl View Post
    That is not the end-all and be-all of the Constitution. There have been 27 amendments since then, some of them greatly expanding the role of the federal government well beyond Article 1, Section 8.
    Besides the 16th amendment which gave Congress the power to tax incomes, which amendments greatly expanded the role of the Federal Government?
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
    James Madison, The Federalist No. 45


    "Beware the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry."
    Thomas Paine


  25. #25
    Is me. Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas, usually
    Posts
    8,941
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    I don't think the GOP or the Tea Party is "anti-government".
    More likely, they want the Federal government to adhere to the enumerated powers as written in Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution.


    http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html
    Regardless of what terms you'd like to put it in, the real-world result is the same.

    We've got a thread right now on relief for hurricane Sandy. One would think that actually paying out on the flood insurance that the government made these people buy would be a given. One would think it would be bipartisan. But no, it's been delayed and delayed, and there was pressure not to even pay out on people's flood insurance claims, because, quote "Congress should not allow the federal government to be involved in the flood insurance industry in the first place."

    To those people, I say, "Look, assholes, regardless of whether or not you think congress SHOULD have set up flood insurance, fact is, they did. Now pay the fuck up so that people can get their lives back together."

    We've seen the same argument with gays in the military. The Republican nominees this time around were unified in their belief that the military should not recognize/support ANY sexual orientation, and to write laws forcing them to recognize same-sex marriage would change that. (The ol' "special privileges" argument.)

    Of course, that ignores our current reality, wherein the military actually DOES recognize and support heterosexual norms, by having policies regarding married couples (among other things) in place.

    Regardless of how you think things *should* be, we need lawmakers who vote based on how things *are.* If you're refusing to pay out on insurance claims because you don't think congress should have offered insurance, you're ignoring reality and causing real life, actual harm to living human beings based on what you - personally - think the law *should* be.

    You are hampering the job of government because you don't think it should be doing the job it's doing. And I don't care if you want to call that anti-government or being a strict constitutionalist or whatnot, when you're making funding and enforcement decisions not based on the actual merits, the actual situation, or the actual needs, but instead on how you think the world "ought" to be, you're being an obstructionist asshole.

    And no matter what you call it, it's damned hard to negotiate with someone who would be fine and dandy watching us all go over the cliff, and watching Sandy victims struggle just to get by day-to-day in the aftermath of a hurricane they SUPPOSEDLY had insurance for.
    ---------------------

    Website where you can get sculptures made of your (or your child's) drawings.

    My favorite indie musician could use some support.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Custom Search