Why Historicals?

Flicka

Dull Old Person
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
147
Location
Far North
Website
www.theragsoftime.com
Yes, and the Cadfael books are wonderful [some of the first adult books I read.] I also like Shirley MacKay and Suzannah Gregory. Lindsey Davis' I enjoyed, until I could no longer get past the Americanisms.

I think this is another extension of the 21st century character mindset, escaping into the 1st/12th/17th century. And something we must be wary of. I'm writing Roman spy thrillers, so it is something that I'm wary of, not allowing 20th century Cold War style language in, and of course there are no phone-taps etc, but extensive networks of informers, and cloak and dagger [maybe toga and dagger :D] stuff going on.

Mine seems to become murder mysteries with a side dose of early 20th century spies. I have a hard time wrapping my head around how amateurish they were...

ETA: The funny thing is that Lindsey Davis is British and I read a rant from her somewhere where she was upset because Americans wanted her to translate the books into American English because they found them hard to read. She said that British people have no problem reading American books and she couldn't see why vice-versa shouldn't be the same.
 

gothicangel

Toughen up.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
691
Location
North of the Wall
Mine seems to become murder mysteries with a side dose of early 20th century spies. I have a hard time wrapping my head around how amateurish they were...

ETA: The funny thing is that Lindsey Davis is British and I read a rant from her somewhere where she was upset because Americans wanted her to translate the books into American English because they found them hard to read. She said that British people have no problem reading American books and she couldn't see why vice-versa shouldn't be the same.

I read up on Walsingham [Elizabeth I's spymaster.] A lot of amateur historian's talk of the Frumentarii as Rome's 'secret service,' which is a load of BS, because it was never that organised. Each legion did have a cohort of 'speculatores' [which is what my MC is], who officially were imperial messengers, but are know to be involved in spying, and assassinations.

I don't mind Americanisms, in my American books. But Romans calling a girl 'cute,' not so much.
 

Flicka

Dull Old Person
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
147
Location
Far North
Website
www.theragsoftime.com
I read up on Walsingham [Elizabeth I's spymaster.] A lot of amateur historian's talk of the Frumentarii as Rome's 'secret service,' which is a load of BS, because it was never that organised. Each legion did have a cohort of 'speculatores' [which is what my MC is], who officially were imperial messengers, but are know to be involved in spying, and assassinations.

Mine are all sprung from the last dying twitches of the Great Game. Kipling's Kim actually depicts a much better organised Secret Service than the reality, and that's saying something...
 

bulldoggerel

Let Them Eat Crow
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
156
Reaction score
18
It seems to me, the further we get from the past ( and I can only judge this by reading those who wrote within their eras) the further we get from a healthy fatalism. I miss fatalism in today's culture. I find it only by wading around in various forms of the past, music, writing, even architecture.
 

mayqueen

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
4,624
Reaction score
1,547
Each legion did have a cohort of 'speculatores' [which is what my MC is], who officially were imperial messengers, but are know to be involved in spying, and assassinations.
That sounds really neat! I believe the love interest in Gillian Bradshaw's Beacon at Alexandria was an imperial messenger. Before reading that book, I had no idea about their existence. I thought that one would make a great character for a historical mystery.
 

Hip-Hop-a-potamus

My rhymes are bottomless
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
1,695
Reaction score
327
Obviously I love history, and I love reading it, but I'm not as far into the past as some of you.

The early 20th century to me, is fascinating. All the changes that were going on-- the upheavals, the world wars, the advances in medicine, technologies like telephone, telegraph, moving pictures...

I enjoy the promise of that era- the big dreams and luxury attained by some, and nothing gives me greater pleasure than experiencing it from a firsthand perspective, BEING that person, like fp said, then tearing it down. The melancholy and "what could have been" nostalgia intrigue me.

And yeah...the clothes were amazing. ;)
 

Lil

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
867
Reaction score
155
Location
New York
Because historicals are fun to read and fun to write.
 

gothicangel

Toughen up.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
691
Location
North of the Wall
That sounds really neat! I believe the love interest in Gillian Bradshaw's Beacon at Alexandria was an imperial messenger. Before reading that book, I had no idea about their existence. I thought that one would make a great character for a historical mystery.

I discovered them in a real obscure way too. I was researching the obvious frumentarii option and saw a reference to speculatores and exploratores [military scouts.] A little more research, and discovered the Praetorian Guard had a whole cohort of them.

Thanks for the book tip, I'll have to hunt it out. :)
 

LaceWing

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
2,212
Reaction score
272
Location
all over the map
I'm not a great reader of historicals per se, but am very interested in pre- and early-industrial times. For instance, I just couldn't figure out why so little attention was paid to all the damn noise machines make -- until some book made the point that clopping horses, especially on cobblestones, were pretty noisy. (Not to mention that mistreating the serfs was de riguer at the time.)

I want to know "What were we thinking!" and "How did we go wrong?" It's a balance to a long interest in dystopian/utopian concerns. Plus, I'm getting over a strong distaste for eras drenched with religion and can better get past all that when I want to.
 

ishtar'sgate

living in the past
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
3,801
Reaction score
459
Location
Canada
Website
www.linneaheinrichs.com
I'm an avid reader of historical non-fiction and when I find gaps and discrepancies I love to play 'what if'. Right now I'm playing the game in ancient Babylon. There are huge gaps so lots of room to play.:D
 

Eddyz Aquila

Noob Writers United
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
2,034
Reaction score
241
Location
Bucharest, Romania
I love traveling in time, honestly, if I could become a "time travel ghost" and just float around in space during history... you'd probably forget me there.

I'm also a military history nut - anything that has to do with swords, Crusades, knights, longbows, you name em... It rings with me.

And plus, there's things that some of us couldn't do in these years - namely covert operations and all of that. There's a deeper sense of mystery and unknown when it comes to history.