- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
- Messages
- 11,176
- Reaction score
- 3,200
- Location
- Walking the Underworld
- Website
- www.richardgarfinkle.com
The challenge of common ground is one that exists at all times for all people. It's not just things like our perceptions of color that are unique to each person. It's pretty clear that no two people have exactly the same meanings for anything. This is, at least in part, because of the associative nature of human thought and memory. Every word, thought, idea, story, etc is made up of our own associations with that idea.
This is about to get idiosyncratic:
How then can we communicate at all? It seems to me that there are two different processes people use in tallking and listening which I've been personally calling Blurring and Sharing.
Blurring is the process of glossing over the differences between what one person means and what another person means. It's a kind of destructive interference that takes away the meanings of ideas and leaves things like empty slogans behind. The thing about blurring is that it makes it easy for a lot of people to think they are in agreement when in fact they have no common ground at all.
Sharing takes advantage of the differences in people's views. It accepts the idea that a concept may be more than one person understands. It allows for 'I never thought of that'. It's one of those simultaneously humbling and enlightening things.
I liken blurring and sharing to a different way of looking at the old story of the Blind Men and the Elephant. Each feels one part of the elephant and declares their personal view of what elephant is (tail : snake, leg : tree) etc. If they hold stubbornly to their views they get nowhere. If they share their understanding knowing their own limitations they might be able to, together understand the Elephant in the room.
This may sound abstract, but it's an everyday aspect of my life. I have an Analytical (by which I mean process oriented) non Visual mind. My wife, Alessandra has a brilliant visual mind. I can help her with the kinds of processes that are not possible to see, thus contributing a little to her work. And she helps me with the subtle visual aspects of my work thus filling in the vast gaps in mine. We go much further than either of us could if we walked alone or if we insisted that our perspectives were right in all aspects.
This is about to get idiosyncratic:
How then can we communicate at all? It seems to me that there are two different processes people use in tallking and listening which I've been personally calling Blurring and Sharing.
Blurring is the process of glossing over the differences between what one person means and what another person means. It's a kind of destructive interference that takes away the meanings of ideas and leaves things like empty slogans behind. The thing about blurring is that it makes it easy for a lot of people to think they are in agreement when in fact they have no common ground at all.
Sharing takes advantage of the differences in people's views. It accepts the idea that a concept may be more than one person understands. It allows for 'I never thought of that'. It's one of those simultaneously humbling and enlightening things.
I liken blurring and sharing to a different way of looking at the old story of the Blind Men and the Elephant. Each feels one part of the elephant and declares their personal view of what elephant is (tail : snake, leg : tree) etc. If they hold stubbornly to their views they get nowhere. If they share their understanding knowing their own limitations they might be able to, together understand the Elephant in the room.
This may sound abstract, but it's an everyday aspect of my life. I have an Analytical (by which I mean process oriented) non Visual mind. My wife, Alessandra has a brilliant visual mind. I can help her with the kinds of processes that are not possible to see, thus contributing a little to her work. And she helps me with the subtle visual aspects of my work thus filling in the vast gaps in mine. We go much further than either of us could if we walked alone or if we insisted that our perspectives were right in all aspects.