• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Sex Difference with unpleasant memories

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
Apparently men more accurately remember unpleasant things:


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120201092721.htm

I haven't yet looked at veinglory's link, but the difference sex makes in titling is interesting.

Men More Likely to Have an Accurate Memory of Unpleasant Experiences

ScienceDaily (Feb. 1, 2012) — A woman's memory of an experience is less likely to be accurate than a man's if it was unpleasant and emotionally provocative, according to research undertaken by University of Montreal researchers at Louis-H Lafontaine Hospital....

But later:

..."Our test relied on photos -- we found firstly that highly arousing pictures blur women's capacity to determine whether they've seen it before, and secondly that women have a clearer memory of attractive experiences than men. Arousal has an enhancing effect on the memory of men however, as does 'low valence' or unpleasantness."
...

You'd hardly catch that the title and intro could have just as easily been about women's (hypothesized) greater ability to remember pleasant experiences more accurately than men.


That's just a quick first impression. The study does sound interesting, and I'm not meaning to discount that. Still, I hope it was just the reporter who decided on all of that phrasing. These kinds of studies have been fraught with so much bias historically that it made me pause.
 

Maxx

Got the hang of it, here
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
202
Location
Durham NC
I haven't yet looked at veinglory's link, but the difference sex makes in titling is interesting.



But later:



You'd hardly catch that the title and intro could have just as easily been about women's (hypothesized) greater ability to remember pleasant experiences more accurately than men.

If you look at figure 1 in the online article Veinglory cited, you can see the differential impact of Valence is larger than arousal and so saying "Men remember unpleasant things better" is not as misleading as it seems.

BUT I suspect the amount of gender-unbalanced cultural information in the unpleasant pictures is what is throwing things off. In my experience as a man, women remember things better overall unless it is in some area where men tend to have more actual experience structuring their memories.
 

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
If you look at figure 1 in the online article Veinglory cited, you can see the differential impact of Valence is larger than arousal and so saying "Men remember unpleasant things better" is not as misleading as it seems.

BUT I suspect the amount of gender-unbalanced cultural information in the unpleasant pictures is what is throwing things off. In my experience as a man, women remember things better overall unless it is in some area where men tend to have more actual experience structuring their memories.

Ah! That makes sense, although it's still misleading to have only one takeaway in any title about the studies. I like your title better, and the authors' own title is what I like best :) Yes, I'd really have magazine articles with those sorts of titles in a perfect world :D

I can't look at the studies in detail today, though. I'll get sucked in, and I don't have time! I'll revisit it later :)

eta: "BUT I suspect the amount of gender-unbalanced cultural information in the unpleasant pictures is what is throwing things off." Yeah, that's where my mind goes immediately, too. Those kinds of studies are so hard to do very well, I think.
 

Wojciehowicz

Alien to My Own Planet
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
199
Reaction score
5
Website
outpostearth.onedamnballoon.com
Human women are noted for never forgetting the slightest disappointment in bed, and deflating the pleasant if fuzzy memories of the men involved. So, I'm not sure how accurate this can be or what the practical application is beyond using corporal punishment to get men to remember to take the garbage out or not to leave the seat up.
 

Snick

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
934
Reaction score
86
Location
Havatoo
Interesting. I wonder if the matter of arousal and orgasm in women being more intense was considered. I guess that the link posted by Vein may answer that. Too bad it costs to read.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,933
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
You can see the figures for free which is a good portion of the info.

It is also only the link at the bottom of the article OP linked to--always good to read any report on research at least to the point where they state who did the research and where it is published. Because, honestly, most secondary coverage of primary research is pretty misleading/outright wrong.