Pen Names vs One Name for e-publishing

Kurlumbenus

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
252
Reaction score
17
I'm a fairly prolific guy who writes across a broad swath of genre. Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.

The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.

Where is the balance point between the exposure that a wide library can offer, and the dangers of brand diffusion with too many genres stuffed under one pen-name? Is each genre and subgenre better off as a separate author entity, or can we take a broader approach? Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?
 

Kurlumbenus

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
252
Reaction score
17
Interesting read! Not all of that applies as-is to e-publishing, of course, but still a lot of valid points.
 

shaldna

The cake is a lie. But still cake.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
7,485
Reaction score
897
Location
Belfast
Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.

I dont' think you need a new pen name for every genre. But I think grouping genres is more sensible. For instance, if you write horror and sci-fi then you can probably group them together. But if you write horror and chick lit then you'll probably want different pen names.

The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.

Bolding mine. See my point above about grouping genres.

Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?

I read a lot of authors who write with different pen names, I know this and I read several of them, but, for instance, If I know that Annie Author writes fantasy, but uses the name Jenny Author to write westerns, then I will know what to expect when I pick up Jenny Author, or Annie Author, and I won't feel mislead.

If I like Annie Author enough, even if I dont' generally like westerns, I may pick up on of Jenny Author's books, just to see what they are like.
 

Irysangel

She of Many Names
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,711
Reaction score
936
I vote that you go with one name. As a writer, having 3 names is a total pain in the butt. As a reader, I gravitate toward authors I know and 'trust' and if you're self-publishing, the genre isn't as important as much as it needs to feel like one of 'your' books, if that makes sense.
 

Kurlumbenus

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
252
Reaction score
17
No, I get it. I do have some variation in voice depending on what I'm writing, though... I tend towards the dark and fantastic (not necessarily fantasy) most of the time.
 

Keyan

ubiquitous
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
629
Reaction score
263
I vote that you go with one name. As a writer, having 3 names is a total pain in the butt. As a reader, I gravitate toward authors I know and 'trust' and if you're self-publishing, the genre isn't as important as much as it needs to feel like one of 'your' books, if that makes sense.

I'd respectfully disagree. I read in several genres, but the authors I read also write outside them. I'd be very annoyed to discover something I expected to be an upbeat fantasy adventure turned out to be dystopian drama from hell. Even if both novels were really well-written.
 

Keyan

ubiquitous
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
629
Reaction score
263
I'm a fairly prolific guy who writes across a broad swath of genre. Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.

The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.

Where is the balance point between the exposure that a wide library can offer, and the dangers of brand diffusion with too many genres stuffed under one pen-name? Is each genre and subgenre better off as a separate author entity, or can we take a broader approach? Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?

I think the answer to this is whether you expect the books to appeal to the same audience. An author's name is a brand.

I would be that disenchanted reader... all it takes is one really unpleasant reading experience for me to shelve the author as someone whose tastes don't align with mine. (After all, if something's been read, it can't be *unread*.)
Whereas if he were writing grim gory horror as Author A and light fantasy as Mr B, and cozy mysteries as Ms D, I would be perfectly content to read only the genres that interested me.

It's not that it's 'differently written' - it's that it's differently experienced by the reader. My concern is not that I'll find a book boring. There's a delete button for that. It's that I will waste time and energy on a book that actively annoys me and forms a "mindworm" (like an earworm, but worse).
 

Irysangel

She of Many Names
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,711
Reaction score
936
I'd respectfully disagree. I read in several genres, but the authors I read also write outside them. I'd be very annoyed to discover something I expected to be an upbeat fantasy adventure turned out to be dystopian drama from hell. Even if both novels were really well-written.

But that's what packaging and a blurb does - it tells the reader what to expect. Anyhow, multiple pen names might be exactly what the OP wants. I was just speaking from my experience.
 

movieman

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
707
Reaction score
38
Location
Saskatchewan, Canada (ex-UK)
Website
worldsunimagined.blogspot.com
There was a thread on another forum recently about authors who write both young adult and erotica, and how they probably want to use two names so the erotica is less likely to show up on the 'also bought' or 'also viewed' for their young adult books. So there clearly are some good reasons for using different names.