Reck House Press

I submitted to a small publisher, and they asked for a full.

I am not naming the publisher yet because I don't think it would be appropriate to publicly discuss the terms of an offer from a named publisher. This publisher has not been discussed in this forum.

I've had a very good exchange with the editor during which at her request I made ms changes that I believe improved the project substantially. Her participation in this effort indicates a strong interest in the work. She has definitely read both versions of the manuscript (about 90,000 words).

Also, given that she would not make an offer until she had seen a revised ms, I sense a serious attempt at publishing works of quality. Definitely not one of the PA-like firms that would publish anything.

FTR, the work is a spy novel set in the 1950s and 60s, and this is the only interest that I received in the work from the 30 or thereabouts queries I sent out.





She sent me the contract. I have the following concerns:

1. Ten year term of contract.
2. No advance.
3. Low royalties with a graduated scale depending on number of copies sold. The range is from 4% to 10% of RRP for print edition and 5% to 11% for ebooks. (Needs sales of 20,000 to reach the highest percent. These are royalties for copies sold by the publisher directly to consumers. Copies sold through other distribution channels have lower royalites.)
4. Low discount (7% of RRP) for author copies. (Goes up as copies purchased increases.)
5. Publisher holds copyright.

When I compare these terms to those in the contract that Musa Publisher (also a small publisher) offers, I am inclined to think that these terms (those of the unnamed publisher) are not author-friendly.

(http://penumbra.musapublishing.com/includes/musanonagent8-15.pdf)

But I have no experience with publishing fiction and have been out of publishing altogether for a number of years.

So, I toss it out for comment. Advice is appreciated.

victoriastrauss said:

These percentages are unacceptable, especially for ebooks. Especially if they're paid on net, rather than list price.

Click to expand...

Based on RRP (recommended retail price or cover price).

I'm sending you an email.

Thanks.

Thanks to all for the advice.

Gillhoughly said:

Or -- and this is a 180 from what I'd have recommended this time last year -- check out Kindle, Smashwords and PubIt! For print books, Lulu or CreateSpace.

Click to expand...

I have published niche books with Kindle and Createspace. I shopped this one around because I figured a publisher would do a better job with marketing than I can do.

Gillhoughly said:

Granted, I've an advantage since I sold professionally for 20 years prior to the ebook revolution and have an audience, so you won't get the same results.

Click to expand...

I did, too. But my fan base has forgotten me, probably. I retired young.

Thanks for the good words.

herdon said:

Yeah, it's a bad contract.

But the important part here is that it totally defeats the purpose of this forum not to name the publisher. The entire reason for this forum is to warn would-be authors from signing with publishers who offer bad contracts, can't actually sell books or are simply scams.

Click to expand...

In this case I didn't post to "out" the publisher. It was to learn whether those practices are now conventional and decide accordingly.

The publisher is new and ingenuous. I will pass the comments in this thread on and see the reaction. Perhaps they will try to redeem themselves. If not, if they try to justify their position, I'll post the publisher's name. Thus the "maybe" in the subject line. I'm trying to be fair.

It looks to me like the kind of contract they would send to aspiring writers who are longing to be published and who'll do backflips just to have a contract in hand.

herdon said:

By not naming the publisher, you are allowing other authors to possibly sign what is obviously a bad contract.

Click to expand...

I would expect that other writers who have the good sense to read this forum and be thus warned would have the intelligence to see the similarities between what I posted and what they've been offered. I think that having read these comments the publisher might mend their ways. If not, I'll rat them out.

The real bummer is the time I wasted waiting for a contract. One of their submission guidelines is that once they've asked for a full, they'd like it not to be a multiple submission. I naively went along with that. Not really a problem since I didn't have other interest shown in the project. But I stopped submitting when they asked for the full.

This novel is time-sensitive from a marketing standpoint. It needs to ride the crest of interest that the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination will generate in about a year and a half. I may have run out of time given the typical two years that I'm told it takes to get published once you get representation. Self-publishing and promotion (ugh) might be my only recourse. At least I know how to do the publishing part.

I'll report back when I have the publisher's reaction. I sure do hate to lose that editor, though.

Thanks so much to everyone for commenting on this thread.

Gillhoughly said:

Blame J.A. Konrath.

Click to expand...

Gillhoughly said:

You may want to send the name by private message to Victoria Strauss. Writer Beware may have info on the company or need more info.

Click to expand...

I did. She hadn't heard of the company. I'll send her the contract when I have time to scan it in. It's a 17-page behemoth.