Four-year-old on TV news: "I'm gonna have ME a gun!"

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,322
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
This ties in with the "If a tree falls in the forest..." thread in that it's about reporting the news.

The child's comments were "edited for television" or something like that. Here's the news video (the first 30 seconds are reports of shootings, THEN it gets interesting), followed by a video of the 4-year-old's complete comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1sMwsVuX6A

Here is one of several online stories on it:
http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/123978/reporters_distort_4yearolds_gun_comments
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
Pathetic. On so many levels it's disgusting.
 

Jessianodel

Blessed by the AW Gods
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
1,241
Reaction score
85
Location
The Control Room
Did anyone notice that in the raw footage, the TV reporter spoke to the little boy with bad grammar, and he also said "Damn!" to him? (Go to 1:00.)

He was quoting the kid because the kid said "I ain't scared of nothin". I'm not sure why he said damn.

Editing the story just shows no morals at all. Even the other girl they interviewed said nothing about wanting a gun, she just said she didn't want anything to happen to her family. But because they used the edited video of the little kid before hand it made it seem like everyone was planning to go out the next day on a gun-buying trip. Honestly I don't understand why they thought they could do that so no one would notice.

And it would be so easy to turn that into a more heart-warming story. Obviously when you're talking about kids being hurt and shot nothing can really be heart-warming, but they could have said the police have been a positive reinforcement inspiring young children to join them rather than hang out on the streets. I mean really, this is what they went for??
 

icerose

Lost in School Work
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
11,549
Reaction score
1,646
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Utah
That's pathetic that they'd twist a little boy's intent to fit a news story. Especially when the little boy's words had so much more impact. The fact that he wants to grow up and be a police officer and make a positive difference on his neighborhood is a fantastic thing.
 

Satsya

slow and steady
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
409
Reaction score
43
Location
Somewhere over there.
From the given article:
What these "journalists" forgot is that kids are people too.
No--what they forgot is that the duty of a journalist is to report the facts, not create the facts.

If they honestly can't find the real stories going on in the world, and have to resort to creating their own, they're hacks. It's time for them to consider a career change.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
This was just a sleazy TV station trying to assassinate the character of Black males by playing into the fear of viewers that Black boys like nothing better than getting a gun and shooting the hell out of the place.

It ain't necessarily so.

A Chicago TV station now says it made two ethical mistakes when it aired an interview with a 4-year-old boy last month.

The first mistake was interviewing a child at a crime scene. But things grew even worse when the station edited the boy’s interview in a way that made it seem as though the African American child idolized guns and criminals.

In fact, the child told the photographer that he wanted to be a police officer. The station edited out that part of the interview.

A story published last week on the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education’s website first raised questions about the interview. Dori J. Maynard, president of the Institute, said, “We have long been worried about the ways in which the media helps perpetuate negative stereotypes of boys and men of color, but this appears to be overtly criminalizing a preschooler.”
4-year-old boy: “I’m not scared of nothing.”

Photographer: “When you get older are you going to stay away from all these guns?”

Boy: “No.”

Photographer: “No? What are you going to do when you get older?”

Boy: “I’m going to have me a gun!”


In describing the story on the 4:30 a.m. news, WBBM anchor Steve Bartelstein called the boy’s reaction “disturbing.” After the clip aired, he commented, “That was scary indeed.” Co-anchor Susan Carlson responded, “Hearing that little boy there, wow!”

Another video of the interview tells a different story. Poynter.org and The Maynard Institute got an email from a source who identified himself only as The Chicago News Watchdog that included another portion of the interview with the child.

That version makes it clear that the interview with the child was taken out of context. Here’s the complete exchange, with the deleted portion in bold:
Photographer:“Boy, you ain’t scared of nothing! Damn! When you get older are you going to stay away from all these guns?”

Boy: “No.”

Photographer: “No? What are you going to do when you get older?”

Boy: “I’m going to have me a gun!”

Photographer: “You are! Why do you want to do that?”

Boy: “I’m going to be the police!”

Photographer: “OK, then you can have one.”
As the father of a Black male, I'm glad to see the White media doing their part to ensure the world regards him with fear and loathing.

Poynter.org, a journalism website, suggests some guidelines be followed when interviewing juveniles.
When interviewing juveniles, journalists should consider:
Journalistic Purpose and Quality of Information

  • What is my journalistic purpose in interviewing this juvenile?
  • In what light will this person be shown? What is their understanding or ability to understand how viewers or listeners might perceive the interview? How mature is this juvenile? How aware is he/she of the ramifications of his/her comments?
  • What motivations does the juvenile have in cooperating with this interview?
  • How do you know what this young person says is true? How much of what this young person says does he/she know first-hand? How able are they to put what they know into context? Do others, adults, know the same information? How can you corroborate the juvenile’s information?
  • How clearly have you identified yourself to the juvenile? Do they know they are talking to a reporter?
Minimize Harm

  • What harm can you cause by asking questions or taking pictures of the juvenile even if the journalist never includes the interview or pictures in a story?
  • How would you react if you were the parent of this child? What would your concerns be and how would you want to be included in the decision about whether the child is included in a news story?
  • How can you include a parent or guardian in the decision to interview a juvenile? What effort has the journalist made to secure parental permission for the child to be included in a news story? Is it possible to have the parent/guardian present during the course of the interview? What are the parents’ motivations for allowing the child to be interviewed? Are there legal issues you should consider, such as the legal age of consent in your state?
  • If you conclude that parental consent is not required, at least give the child your business card so the parents can contact you if they have an objection to the interview being used.
Don't believe the hype. Or the lies.
 

muravyets

Old revolutionary
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
7,212
Reaction score
974
Location
Massachusetts, USA
Website
www.facebook.com
Uh, guidelines for how to interview children are all well and good. However, when a news station gets a full interview in which a child says he wants to join the police force and be a cop with a gun when he grows up, and they deliberately edit that to delete all reference to becoming a cop, and when this truncated thing airs, they prattle on about how disturbing it is to hear young black people wish for guns, I don't think the problem is that the interviewee was a child.

I think another point needs to be added to that list of guidelines: Ask yourself, am I being a lying, slandering bastard in interviewing this child?
 

dgiharris

Disgruntled Scientist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 24, 2006
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
1,833
Location
Limbo
Wow, talk about irresponsible.

Food for thought. If the media can misquote a 4-yr old like this, just imagine how the media misquotes Democrats and Republicans in order to get those juicy sound bites....

And then imagine how often we fall for it...
 

Bartholomew

Comic guy
Kind Benefactor
Poetry Book Collaborator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
8,507
Reaction score
1,956
Location
Kansas! Again.
Wow, talk about irresponsible.

Food for thought. If the media can misquote a 4-yr old like this, just imagine how the media misquotes Democrats and Republicans in order to get those juicy sound bites....

And then imagine how often we fall for it...

All the goddamn time.

-Bart, newspaper copy-editor, student reporter.
 

Zoombie

Dragon of the Multiverse
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
40,775
Reaction score
5,947
Location
Some personalized demiplane
Wow, talk about irresponsible.

Irresponsible is leaving the beer in easy reach of your children, or leaving a gun cabinet unlocked.

This is malicious pandering to sell tickets by making an fairly innocent and optimistic seeming kid into a terrifying proto-gangster to further cement the divide between ethnicity in our country.

This is fucking evil.
 

Diana Hignutt

Very Tired
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
13,321
Reaction score
7,113
Location
Albany, NY
This is fucking evil.

Now, you're catching on. It's sad to see your optimism dimmed in any way, but this is the battle we are fighting...against our ammoral corporate masters.
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
Irresponsible is leaving the beer in easy reach of your children, or leaving a gun cabinet unlocked.

This is malicious pandering to sell tickets by making an fairly innocent and optimistic seeming kid into a terrifying proto-gangster to further cement the divide between ethnicity in our country.

This is fucking evil.
:Trophy:

You have redeemed yourself. :D
 

Alpha Echo

I should be writing.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
9,615
Reaction score
1,852
Location
East Coast
I hate humanity.

I feel bad for that kid. His ambitions are noble, and a cocky, arrogant, power/fame-hungry so-called journalists made the kid sound like evil.

Um...look in the mirror asshat.
 

Zoombie

Dragon of the Multiverse
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
40,775
Reaction score
5,947
Location
Some personalized demiplane
No, no, if I were to lose my optimism, I'd say something broad and far reachingly cynical like

"I hate humanity"

Seems to be like a very select number of people are being douchebags here. If this kid is any indication, the community has people within it working towards something better. As an optimist, I think that he and people like him are going to make a better future.

I love humanity.

I hate douchebags. They're not the same thing. One just happens to include the other.
 

fireluxlou

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,089
Reaction score
283
Irresponsible is leaving the beer in easy reach of your children, or leaving a gun cabinet unlocked.

This is malicious pandering to sell tickets by making an fairly innocent and optimistic seeming kid into a terrifying proto-gangster to further cement the divide between ethnicity in our country.

This is fucking evil.

This is so true! I agree.
 

kaitie

With great power comes
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
11,047
Reaction score
2,632
This is sick. Just so seriously sick. Zoombie summed it up well.