Australian customs searches for porn.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bird of Prey

Benefactor Member
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
10,793
Reaction score
1,728
You said earlier..."the privacy and convenience of everyone else be damned."

We shouldn't abandon or have our civil liberties taken away without a fight, even it means, in the most abstract sense, protecting children and animals. If you do, there will be no end in sight to what else you will lose along the way.

And the argument of, "You don't care about the children, the animals?" is exactly the type of rhetoric that will be used to strip us of further liberties if we aren't mindful of protecting ourselves from continued government intrusion into our lives.


Whoa there, Silver. I disagree completely. Goverment intrusion does not equate to the legal tolerance of animal abuse or child abuse. Now I know you are addressing the strict rhetoric, but ultimately, that rhetoric translates into action and what we tolerate as humane conduct within a society. . . .
 

willietheshakes

Gentleman. Scholar. Bastard.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
726
Location
Semi-sunny Victoria BC
Where does civil liberties end, and protecting the innocent begin? Never, for you? You don't care about the children, the animals?

Actually, I wasn't the one making the blanket statements about "the privacy and convenience of everyone else be[ing] damned", so I'm not sure I have anything to answer for.

Quick question for you, though, since you DID make the point: would you be okay if the police searched every house on your block because someone was making meth in the neighbourhood? No warrant, no reasonable cause, just for the protection of the children?
 

Zoombie

Dragon of the Multiverse
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
40,775
Reaction score
5,947
Location
Some personalized demiplane
Where does civil liberties end, and protecting the innocent begin? Never, for you? You don't care about the children, the animals?

Uh...

The fact that we need to explain this to you strikes me as worrying.

How will tramping on people's liberties in ANY WAY protect the innocent in question? This shit is illegal, which means that its going to be underground! Underground and illegal things tend to hide, and they are very GOOD at hiding.

Confiscating INNOCENT PEOPLE'S computers just because they MIGHT have illegal porn on it breaks up civil liberties and won't do any good because anyone who HAS this porn has it hidden away in a way that won't be found.

And...frankly, last time I checked, people were innocent until proven guilty. This flies in the face of that.

I hate real child porn as much as the next sane person, and would love to have it go away. But this is not the answer!
 

Albedo

Alex
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
7,376
Reaction score
2,958
Location
A dimension of pure BEES
You know, Australia's always being pushed over here as a utopia of sunshine with a great standard of living and everybody's happy and nothing ever goes wrong. I wish the TV programmes constantly plugging it as an idyll would cover stuff like this. I'm not saying Australia is actually a dark pit of despair by any means, but I'd like there to be a bit more balance beyond "Oooh, look at the great weather and beaches!". It isn't as perfect as it's made out to be, simply because nowhere COULD be that perfect.
What you see is advertising pure and simple. Oz has an enormous advertising budget and how we depict ourselves in overseas markets becomes obsessional at times. It's important to remember that we're like any other country. A prosperous, developed liberal democracy that nevertheless has problems. Increasing disadvantage, crumbling infrastructure, expanding government power at the price of civil liberties, unaffordable housing, an economy totally reliant on primary production, and a generally disengaged, disaffected populace obsessed with reality television. Like anywhere else.

But the weather's pretty great. Particularly if you're a skin cancer surgeon, all these pasty Celts coming over here are a gold mine. :D

They don't allow body piercing in Australia?
In porn? No. Sorry, I should have been clearer. Fetishes are illegal to depict in media. Not to indulge in.

From what I read in the article, they can ask you if you're carrying porn, and you have to tell them the truth. I didn't really see anything about them making legal porn illegal.
The trouble is that what wouldn't result in a raised eyebrow overseas is often banned in Australia. Small breasts, female ejaculation, visible labia: all illegal to depict. This country is far out of step with most of the West. So anyone coming from a more relaxed jurisdiction might happily declare their porn, not realising the drama it will cause them.

I see no problem with this. If it helps stop child pornography, or the increasingly widespread kind of porn where a woman crushes kittens and bunnies under her feet (google 'crushing videos'), or inhumane bestiality ... I say the privacy and convenience of everyone else be damned. People should be able to put up with a little embarrassment for the sake of innocent animals and children.
This won't do any more to stop child porn than will Chairman Rudd's glorious internet filter. It just doesn't move through those channels, either through the public web or physically. Who the hell would traffic in illegal child pornography through an airport? It's not like drugs where there's no alternate route of distribution.

Albedo said

I'm thinking someone should confiscate his computer....

.

;)

It's all this talk of sucking and holes, isn't it? Clearly, we must penetrate this issue further, to get to the root of your Freudian obsessions.
 

willietheshakes

Gentleman. Scholar. Bastard.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
726
Location
Semi-sunny Victoria BC
I see no problem with this. If it helps stop child pornography, or the increasingly widespread kind of porn where a woman crushes kittens and bunnies under her feet (google 'crushing videos'), or inhumane bestiality ... I say the privacy and convenience of everyone else be damned. People should be able to put up with a little embarrassment for the sake of innocent animals and children.

By the way:
You are aware that the law prohibiting possession of crush porn was struck down by the US Supreme Court a couple of months ago, right?
 

Michael Wolfe

Jambo Bwana
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
4,097
Reaction score
382
In porn? No. Sorry, I should have been clearer. Fetishes are illegal to depict in media. Not to indulge in.


Really? You mean media depictions in general? Does that mean, for example, that piercings are illegal to depict in mainstream cinema?
 

Silver King

Megalops Erectus
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
12,438
Reaction score
8,932
Location
Florida (West Central)
Whoa there, Silver...
For a moment, that phrase reminded me of watching The Lone Ranger when I was a kid.

I probably didn't express myself earlier the way I fully intended, but the point I was trying to make is that we have to be careful, as a society, not to give up our civil liberties lightly, even when it means creating more protections for children and animals or whatever.

It always starts as a noble cause (think Patriot Act), and before you know it, we've traded away far more than we will ever recoup as an investment in protection against what amounts to smoke and mirrors.
 

Fran

Slate grey mole person
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
10,028
Reaction score
855
Location
Paisley, Scotland
^^^^^^^^ Scottish weather-envy.

Hehehe I just repped Albedo that I'd fry to a crisp in seconds over there. Look up "pasty Celt" and there's a picture of me. It was 25C here today and by the end of my 20-minute walk to the shop and back I was hot, sweaty and crabbit*. I'm definitely a cold-climate kinda person. :D

*Crabbit is Scottish for grumpy. There's also a picture of me next to that one if you look it up. ;)
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,334
Reaction score
16,106
Location
Australia.
It's all this talk of sucking and holes, isn't it? Clearly, we must penetrate this issue further, to get to the root of your Freudian obsessions.

See what happens? The whole thread is becoming pornograpy!! It's a slippery slope, people, and that's why we need some protection.

Oh - when I say slippery I mean in the steep sense, not in the, you know, moist sense... and when I said protection I wasn't thinking about, you know - oh damn, Albedo!! now you've got me doing it!!!

;)
 
Last edited:

Cella

Cella
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
26,851
Reaction score
13,880
From what I understand about the provision, they'll only search if you give them any reason to. It's not like they're going to search every single electronics device that comes into the country.
Wondering what criteria they use to deem you worthy of a search....
 

Ruv Draba

Banned
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
5,114
Reaction score
1,322
*Crabbit is Scottish for grumpy.
I suspect that the word crabby ("irritable") used here, might derive from that. A country that will import "crabby" but not not deep-fried Mars Bars clearly thinks it knows what's good for its citizens. :)
 

Cella

Cella
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
26,851
Reaction score
13,880
I hope it wouldn't be hot, sweaty, crabbit, frizzy-haired Scot. ;)
that sounds like profiling....

;)


maybe you have to submit your NetFlix queue prior to your trip so that they can determine if your drawn to something they find questionable, lol....
 

Brutal Mustang

Loves interplanetary chaos.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
449
Location
Casper, Wyoming
Actually, I wasn't the one making the blanket statements about "the privacy and convenience of everyone else be[ing] damned", so I'm not sure I have anything to answer for.

Quick question for you, though, since you DID make the point: would you be okay if the police searched every house on your block because someone was making meth in the neighbourhood? No warrant, no reasonable cause, just for the protection of the children?

Why not? Wouldn't bother me. I'd give the police some coffee, answer their questions, and thank them for keeping the neighborhood safe. Hell, with the way my neighborhood has been lately, I'd welcome it!

However, searching your laptop while you are in transit and already going through security isn't nearly as imposing to people as having their houses searched while they're in their pajamas, and it's actually a great time to catch some baddies without disturbing the general population. Personally, if I did have legal porn, or honeymoon pics, or whatever on my computer, I wouldn't be bothered by a security person in the other room taking a look. Not in the least.
 

willietheshakes

Gentleman. Scholar. Bastard.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
726
Location
Semi-sunny Victoria BC
Why not? Wouldn't bother me. I'd give the police some coffee, answer their questions, and thank them for keeping the neighborhood safe. Hell, with the way my neighborhood has been lately, I'd welcome it!

However, searching your laptop while you are in transit and already going through security isn't nearly as imposing to people as having their houses searched while they're in their pajamas, and it's actually a great time to catch some baddies without disturbing the general population. Personally, if I did have legal porn, or honeymoon pics, or whatever on my computer, I wouldn't be bothered by a security person in the other room taking a look. Not in the least.


So you don't mind officers of the federal government invading your personal belongings, seeking to enforce laws that don't exist, so long as it protects the beasts and children?

All right, then.

Good to know.
 
Last edited:

Zoombie

Dragon of the Multiverse
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
40,775
Reaction score
5,947
Location
Some personalized demiplane
Well, that's fine if you are part of a voluntary panopticon, but I'm part of the real world and in the real world, there is this thing called privacy.
 

Bird of Prey

Benefactor Member
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
10,793
Reaction score
1,728
For a moment, that phrase reminded me of watching The Lone Ranger when I was a kid.

Lol!! Sometimes I just can't help it, but see, it paid off. You were right there with the right antenna. . . .

I probably didn't express myself earlier the way I fully intended, but the point I was trying to make is that we have to be careful, as a society, not to give up our civil liberties lightly, even when it means creating more protections for children and animals or whatever.

It always starts as a noble cause (think Patriot Act), and before you know it, we've traded away far more than we will ever recoup as an investment in protection against what amounts to smoke and mirrors.

I don't disagree that we have to be prudent, but the Patriot Act is still a far cry from blatant abuse of animals and children or for that matter, the elderly and those inbetween in this country. . . . .
 

Brutal Mustang

Loves interplanetary chaos.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
449
Location
Casper, Wyoming
... in the real world, there is this thing called privacy.

Not always. And certainly not everywhere. The airport, where you are entering someone else's country is one of the places you can expect to be inspected. If certain porn is illegal in Australia, than it makes sense they search you for it, just like they search you for drugs, fruits, and animals.
 

Bird of Prey

Benefactor Member
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
10,793
Reaction score
1,728
Let me guess. You're in Colorado Springs, right?


Having several good friends there, knowing the town, and having flown in and out of there, I can't imagine how this is relevant. . . .
 

poetinahat

say it loud
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
21,851
Reaction score
10,441
What I really loved was when the previous Government here enacted a law making ISP's responsible for any content that was transmitted over their networks -- effectively forcing them to block websites themselves. That law made Australia one of four countries in the world at the time to have that sort of censorship. Two of the others were, I believe, China and Iran; I can't remember the third.

Plus it rained on Sunday. It's the Apocalypse!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.