AW Amazon Store

If this site is helpful to you,
Please consider a voluntary subscription to defray ongoing expenses.


 

Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: Rationalist trying to Write Fantasy

  1. #1
    figuring it all out
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    62

    Rationalist trying to Write Fantasy

    My efforts to become a rationalist are causing me serious problems with my fantasy writing. I can't suspend my disbelief. I keep trying to make magic more scientific.

    I believe in reason. So does my MC. I want the world she lives in to make sense. How can I do that while still making it a magical world, with a sense of wonder and mystery?

  2. #2
    I've been around the block. lachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Posts
    113
    Good question. I find that my magic systems tend to become fairly mechanical, too, and it bugs me when that happens. My (partial) solution was to dole out the information in small doses, so that the protagonist doesn't know how a lot of magic works.

  3. #3
    practical experience, FTW stephenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    763
    Rationalism and fiction are two different ideas.Putting Rationalism to one side.The idea behind fiction is to make things seem believable ,to make the reader suspend disbelief.It's all down to your skill as a writer. It has nothing to do with your own belief or if it's actually possible. Personally, I like fantasy but not magic.So my suggestion is, write fantasy without magic.

  4. #4
    Court Jester Shadow_Ferret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    In a world of my own making
    Posts
    23,680
    I don't know what a rationalist is. But as far as writing fantasy, it's make-believe, and doesn't necessarily have to be based on our reality or explainable in scientific terms.
    Twitter | Pinterest | WordPress | Tumblr

    I love words but I dont like strange ones. You dont understand them and they dont understand you. Old words is like old friends, you know em the minute you see em. -- Will Rogers

    "Blame it on my ADD, baby." -- AWOLNATION

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    Hypatia, my professional background is in science and many people here consider me strongly rationalistic, but I write fantasy, horror, SF and other things. I don't see a contradiction in that, and I'm not alone. In the introduction of some editions of The Left Hand of Darkness, SFF author Ursula K. Le Guin wrote: "I write about gods, I am an atheist." Beliefs are interesting because they reflect the desires and fears of the people who hold them. Delving into the fantastical always somehow ends up becoming a dive into psychology or sociology, and that's what makes it attractive to me: being able to dig into thought and deed and humanity itself, while filing the serial-numbers off particulars of cultures and history.

    But whatever else it is, the fantastic should be fun. Its very improbability is its attraction -- it lets you drive characters harder and twist them up worse than we can easily manage by sticking to the probable.

    My advice then is to do it for fun. Madness has its own logic.

  6. #6
    A Gentleman of a refined age... thothguard51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Out side the beltway...
    Posts
    9,314
    If you try to rationalize "love" long enough, you will realize love is irrational emotion and yet love exist all around us.

    Magic in fiction ain't much different. It's all about how you dress it up and present it to the reader so they find it attractive and hopefully fall in love all over again...
    Knowledge is learned while wisdom is earned.

    Currently working on...

    From, The Tales of Netherron,
    Book 1, A Game of Pawns
    Book 2, Pawn takes Queen,
    Book 3, Pawn's Gambit,

    In the pipeline,
    Children of Netherron, follow up trilogy
    Guardians of Netherron, prequel trilogy

    http://nickanthony51.wordpress.com (on hiatus)

    Nick Anthony

  7. #7
    It's a doggy dog world benbradley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Transcending Canines
    Posts
    20,326
    I consider myself a rationalist, a naturalist (someone who believes in the natural world and that there is no supernatural influence) and maybe a few other such labels, but I don't let that limit my imagination. I very much like hard SF as my favorite genre, mostly because more often than other genres it expresses a rationalistic outlook on existence. But still, I've read (a moderate amount) and written (a little) in other, "less rationalistic" genres.

    Mystery author Lawrence Block has a writing book, I haven't read it yet but just the title is instructive: "Telling Lies for Fun and Profit." It's what we do when we write fiction. We tell lies, the reader knows they're lies (or that there ARE lies in the story, but not necessarily what they are), but the idea is to write convincingly and interestingly enough that the reader is willing to follow along for his own entertainment.

    And what Ruv said.

    Here's a link to a short story I wrote a few years ago. As you'll see when you read it the MC believes, just as I do, in a naturalistic worldview, but as "The Author" I put him in a situation that challenged his belief.

    If you haven't been to AW's Flash Fiction forum before, it'll ask you for a password (this is just to keep search engines from reading and indexing the writing). That password is:

    flashed

    Here's the link:
    http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84639

    I like the idea of that story, and it's kind of the thing I want to write more of, to put people in strange or uncomfortable situations like that and see how they react. As Ruv said, it's the psychology and sociology involved in these characters and situations that (help) make it interesting.
    Ello.
    NaNoWriMo 2014: Unknown.
    Tweets daily or so.

  8. #8
    Comic guy Bartholomew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kansas! Again.
    Posts
    8,486
    Quote Originally Posted by Hypatia View Post
    My efforts to become a rationalist are causing me serious problems with my fantasy writing. I can't suspend my disbelief. I keep trying to make magic more scientific.

    I believe in reason. So does my MC. I want the world she lives in to make sense. How can I do that while still making it a magical world, with a sense of wonder and mystery?
    You're the author, AKA, God, and can therefore set whatever rules you want.

  9. #9
    Prodigiously Hanged
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    11,525
    I've raised this issue a few time with friends and acquaintances, that the act of writing fiction is similar to the production of a religious text in that most stories bolster a belief in universal justice (i.e., good people get rewarded, bad people get punished), when in reality there's no indication of any such thing. Or as I originally phrased it, fiction is the affirmation of divine influence in profluent events. Lies we tell each other to feel better about the shitty parts of life.

    Still, that hasn't stopped me from writing fiction (and fantasy in particular), probably because my stories generally don't obey the notion of universal justice. Is that a flaw? Perhaps. But I'm not willing to contribute to the perpetuation of false belief, even if it does make people feel better.
    Last edited by SPMiller; 05-14-2010 at 02:33 PM.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMiller View Post
    most stories bolster a belief in universal justice
    I don't think most fantasy stories are just. Rather, they favour their sympathetic characters and abuse their unsympathetic ones. Reader bias tends to see sympathetic characters as 'good', and unsympathetic characters as 'bad'. Fantasy also idealises its sympathetic characters -- making them symbolic of values sacred to our culture, while unsympathetic characters are made to embody taboos. The 'good vs evil' struggle we see in many fantasies is really a fight between the sacred and the taboo. Naturally, reader bias likes to see the sacred saved, and the taboo punished, but the morality of the fight might not withstand very close scrutiny -- ever wonder what happend to the Orcish females and children in Lord of the Rings?

  11. #11
    Prodigiously Hanged
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    11,525
    You can redefine or replace the terms however you like (within reason) and not lose the essence of the thing.

  12. #12
    Swordsman zornhau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,492
    Use the magic rationally as a tool to amplify and hence investigate your themes.
    (Newly Agented but unpublished author. The usual caveats apply.)

    German Longsword in a nutshell: "I'd shake your hand... but I'm not sure where it landed."

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    What Zornhau said. Fantasy tends to exaggerate things, but the things can still have their own logic.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMiller View Post
    I'm not willing to contribute to the perpetuation of false belief, even if it does make people feel better.
    I've been thinking about this for a couple of days, SP. It resonates quite strongly with me. Here it is in my own terms...

    Fiction is an emotional journey, and fantasy ornaments that journey with whimsy, whose main job (I feel) is to heighten mood, create romance and help articulate psychological and moral problems for the characters to solve.

    But not every fantasy is a romance, and I'd argue that a rationalist approach to fantasy dispenses with romance entirely. A rationalist knows that behind every solution is another problem, so how can we believe in Happy Ever Afters? Moreover, romance plays favourites with its characters based on who they are, and rationalism holds that the world responds only to what we do. So it's hard to carve the world up neatly into heroes and villains -- we're more likely to populate our worlds with characters of mixed morality. And any gods are likely to be transactional, idiosyncratic, flawed and political because that's the kind of character an indifferent world creates.

    But mostly as a rationalist I look for fantasy that handles consequences fairly and unflinchingly. To a rationalist, wars don't spare the good and harm the bad; revolutions don't create utopias; and heroes must juggle self-interest with service, and sometimes get it wrong. So as a rationalist I can enjoy Lord of the Rings, or Chronicles of Narnia or Le Morte d'Arthur, but I'd never try and write them because they're fundamentally romances. On the other hand, I'd argue that A Wizard of Earthsea or Shadow of the Torturer or Elric of Melnibon are (mostly) not.

  15. #15
    Prodigiously Hanged
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    11,525
    No, we can't write Happily Ever Afters, which means the romance genre is right out (even if what we write is Romance in a classical sense). But the so-called Happily For Now is within reach, though I usually avoid that, too. For me, unhappy endings are equally distasteful, so I aim for the middle ground, which I describe as bittersweet.

    It does amuse me that what I would describe as "fairness" would probably be called "unfair" by a large number of non-rationalist fantasy readers, and this goes back to the issue of universal justice.

  16. #16
    Author of Starbreaker MGraybosch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,860
    Quote Originally Posted by Hypatia View Post
    I want the world she lives in to make sense. How can I do that while still making it a magical world, with a sense of wonder and mystery?
    You can have a magical fantasy world that makes sense as long as you develop a set of fundamental principles that govern how your world works and stick to those principles no matter what.

    If it helps, I'll tell you my own story. I'm a lifelong atheist doing the third draft of a science fantasy novel. The MC learns over the course of the novel that he's an artificial entity called an "asura emulator". He gains access to magic, but finds that the magic is useless to him in most situations. If you wanted to throw lightning, you first need enough energy to generate the lightning. You then need to know exactly how lightning works, to have a firm grasp of the physics involved, before you're able to make it happen. So Morgan decides he's better off using a pistol.
    Matthew Graybosch
    Author of the Starbreaker series, coming soon from Curiosity Quill Press...

    *meow?*

  17. #17
    the world is at my command jennontheisland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    down by the bay
    Posts
    7,104
    I don't consider what I write to be pure fantasy; they're historicals. But before science came along to explain things, they were treated as magic. I use that to add small amounts of the inexplicable.
    You are more than welcome to take anything I say personally, whether it was intended that way or not.

    Eat This.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Hypatia View Post
    My efforts to become a rationalist are causing me serious problems with my fantasy writing. I can't suspend my disbelief. I keep trying to make magic more scientific.

    I believe in reason. So does my MC. I want the world she lives in to make sense. How can I do that while still making it a magical world, with a sense of wonder and mystery?
    Weird, I find magic and science to be 100% compatible.

    Here's an old saying that I think should clear it all up: sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMiller View Post
    I aim for the middle ground, which I describe as bittersweet.
    Mine often end up the same way, SP -- or else sweetly horrific. But I don't aim for a particular mood. I aim for the story questions to be resolved fairly, convincingly and interestingly, and that's just what emerges.

    One of my closest writer buds is a romantic, idealistic sort and she has asked if I detest happy endings. I don't -- I can enjoy them in other folks' writing; I just don't believe them myself. For me, behind every solution is another problem, and nothing really ties off in neat bows unless we narrow the picture down to ignore the residual mess.

    It does amuse me that what I would describe as "fairness" would probably be called "unfair" by a large number of non-rationalist fantasy readers, and this goes back to the issue of universal justice.
    Some readers feel cheated if they're not made happy, but as a reader I feel cheated if I'm lied to, or if the author plays favourites with his characters. Fairness to me requires an unflinching honesty about a fair world; and in a fair world a lot of villains are just heroes in the wrong place; and a lot of heroes are just villains who got lucky, and that's what I write about.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Salis View Post
    sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
    Another way of saying it is that if we're ignorant enough, we can think anything is magic.

  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruv Draba View Post
    Another way of saying it is that if we're ignorant enough, we can think anything is magic.
    Yep, there's certainly an entire spectrum there, but my point is more that you can have scientific underpinnings to magic (THE REASON) without it ever taking away from the allure of the supernatural (the reason doesn't necessarily have to be known by anyone).

  22. #22
    practical experience, FTW
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bostonian in Baltimore via Chicago and DC
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Hypatia View Post
    My efforts to become a rationalist are causing me serious problems with my fantasy writing. I can't suspend my disbelief. I keep trying to make magic more scientific.

    I believe in reason. So does my MC. I want the world she lives in to make sense. How can I do that while still making it a magical world, with a sense of wonder and mystery?
    You're a rationalist about this world. The one you are creating has different rules. That's what fantasy is all about. I can't find any evidence of magic in our world, but its relatively simple to create some evidence in a fabricated one.

    Your writing doesn't need to be consistent with the laws of physics. Physics (as we know them here) don't exist there. You shouldn't need to suspend disbelief.

    You just need to be consistent with the rules you create for your new world/society. Just change the rules of physics.


    In my mind, well thought out, internally consistent magic, is much more convincing then "the author makes it up as he goes along". Its much more satisfying when the reader knows that there is some sort of order to things, whether or not the reader understands exactly how the order governs magic.

  23. #23
    practical experience, FTW
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Zealand - a.k.a Middle Earth
    Posts
    749
    If magic was provable and observable then a true rationalist would not deny it's existence. So if, in the alternate reality that is your setting, magic is known to exist, then all you need to determine is why it exists and how it works. It's all about consistency, as has been said.

    If you're worried about making the magic system too scientific and/or squashing the mystery and wonder of it, then perhaps consider treating it as something that mankind has yet to get a good grasp of. You may know exactly how it works, but your characters can be as ignorant of it as your readers.

  24. #24
    Banned for Trolling
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    8,651
    Quote Originally Posted by SPMiller View Post
    I've raised this issue a few time with friends and acquaintances, that the act of writing fiction is similar to the production of a religious text in that most stories bolster a belief in universal justice (i.e., good people get rewarded, bad people get punished), when in reality there's no indication of any such thing. Or as I originally phrased it, fiction is the affirmation of divine influence in profluent events. Lies we tell each other to feel better about the shitty parts of life.

    Still, that hasn't stopped me from writing fiction (and fantasy in particular), probably because my stories generally don't obey the notion of universal justice. Is that a flaw? Perhaps. But I'm not willing to contribute to the perpetuation of false belief, even if it does make people feel better.

    I don't agree that fiction is "telling lies." Is a story in which good triumphs over evil and justice is done (when we know that's often not what happens in the real world) contributing to false belief? No more than a story in which magic exists. The danger that people will believe the good guys always win because that's what happens in the books they read is no greater than the danger that they'll believe vampires are real because they read books about them.

  25. #25
    practical experience, FTW
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Zealand - a.k.a Middle Earth
    Posts
    749
    I like to ensure that my "good guys" really earn their victories. At least that way it feels more believable, at least to me. Leaves you with a bittersweet ending usually.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Custom Search