At this point, I'm not quite sure of the accuracy of my gut. I fear that I wrote the book that people should want, rather than the one they do.
Warning: I discuss my book now. Anyone who isn't interested is free to disregard. No one even need respond. My feelings won't be hurt. It helps me simply to explain.
The book is about my daughter's education.
When she was 2, we were told that she was in at the bottom of the first percentile of intelligence, would most likely continue to be nonverbal (both receptive and expressive), had autistic-like behaviors that meant there was something wrong with her brain functioning and that would never change, and that she would need to live in a group home. Now she is an honors graduate of an Ivy League college, in grad school in another, and conversant with multiple languages.
So my book describes the struggle and work to get from one extreme to the other. It was a slow process--lots of work, lots of research, lots of fighting with the school system, and finally, my homeschooling her. The facts that seem so dry to agents are the sorts of things that I wish someone would have told me, about how to research, about what "experts" know and don't know, about special education law, and so on.
Several agents have told me the story is interesting but I should stick to it and not get all science-y or legal on people in an attempt to prove my case. I was a lawyer in a previous life--and old habits are hard to break.
Maybe there is some way of putting the dry stuff in the back of the book or a website (to be developed) for those who want it. Or I can make it personal--the agent liked my writing when I was doing that part.
Oh well, it's great having you all here to listen. My husband is kind of fed up at this point--says just to go to smaller, more academic presses that aren't frightened by the citation of evidence.