- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 2,126
- Reaction score
- 342
The problem arises as your writing improves and you still can't tell how close you are.
I agree this can be a problem. I'm actually a pretty good judge of my writing most of the time, but that's because I have to be if I want clients to keep paying me. Fiction is different, very different (though we could arm wrestle about that after I've spent a day writing sales copy), but there are also some parallels that I think keep me pretty self-aware. I'm doubtless not the perfect judge, but I think because I've written for so long, I may be a little better prepared to judge my own writing than some others might be to judge their own.
Some writers, some very successful ones, say they can't judge whether something they write is good or bad. I don't doubt them, but I find that alarming and don't really understand it. Analyzing a story as if someone else wrote it isn't always easy, but I think it's great for writers to do it. How could I revise if I didn't know what was good and bad? I can see new writers being unsure, but I'm always surprised to hear pros say this, and I wonder if they're saying what I think they mean.
It's the longer road to the top rather than the shorter one. I'm just trying to help get as many writers get on the shorter road (or what I think is the shorter road) as possible.
See, I'm just not convinced it's always going to be the shorter road, but you say that it is and that's your right, so we'll leave it at that.
I do realize that everything you've said seems to be in the spirit of being helpful, so if I seem like a smart ass, well, I may actually be one, but that hasn't been my intention here.
Shelley
Last edited: