Obama the conservative?

robeiae

Touch and go
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
46,262
Reaction score
9,912
Location
on the Seven Bridges Road
Website
thepondsofhappenstance.com
Wrong. There's nothing that says your interpretation of the text is authoritative, much less more valid than mine. Nor would the authors' interpretations be authoritative, if we had them, which we don't.

Let's get this straight, all right? Many if not most of the Fed Papers were written by Hamilton, not Madison or Jay, and we all know the friction between Hamilton and your good buddy TJ. If you want to sling quotes around, pick the right ones.

But think what you want. I sure can't stop you.
That's, you know, not much of a rebuttal.

Any way you slice, by any reasonable interpretation, the chief purpose of the Federalist Papers were to promote Ratification (in New York, mostly). And to that end, a primary goal was quelling the fears among many that the Federal Government would have too much power and authority.

Are the opinions offered therein absolute, with regard to the Constitution and the Federal Government. Absolutely not. But they are what they are. And certainly, any opinion on meanings offered by Madison carries more weight than those of anyone else.
 

robeiae

Touch and go
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
46,262
Reaction score
9,912
Location
on the Seven Bridges Road
Website
thepondsofhappenstance.com
Those quotes aren't written in a foreign language, you know. The interpretation is clear as a bell. Thomas Jefferson's prediction of EXACTLY the condition we find ourselves in today simply confirms the accuracy of their statements.
Btw Don, TJ's prognosticating abilites pale in comparison to that of the Farmer:

All the prerogatives, all the essential characteristics of sovereignty, both of the internal and external kind, are vested in the general government, and consequently the several States would not be possessed of any essential power or effective guard of sovereignty. Thus I apprehend, it is evident that the consolidation of the States into one national government (in contra- distinction from a confederacy) would be the necessary consequence of the establishment of the new constitution, and the intention of its framers-and that consequently the State sovereignties would be eventually annihilated, though the forms may long remain as expensive and burdensome remembrances of what they were in the days when (although laboring under many disadvantages) they emancipated this country from foreign tyranny, humbled the pride and tarnished the glory of royalty, and erected a triumphant standard to liberty and independence.
--from Anti-Federalist #39
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
True, rob, but unfortunately the Federalists won.