- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 89
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Richmond Hill
- Website
- www.editapetrick.biz
Publisher and sales
Anonymous warnings are suspect in so many ways that most people just wipe them out of their memory. Indeed, if you have solid proof that Solstice had cheated you out of your legal earnings, signing your name after this post would only help your case - not expose you to litigation.
Solstice would not - could not - file any legal suit against you if you, indeed, had proof of sales, as your statement here says. If that is the case, and you have tangible proof of sales, then any decent lawyer would take up your side of the lawsuit, with no retainer and legal fees paid only when the lawyer wins the case -- which he/she surely would...if things are as you say.
The only time "litigious" element enters the picture is when the author makes false claims and issues defamatory statements about the said publisher. Or when the author does not have any proof of sales and only believes he should have...or any combination of the two. Then I'd understand anonymity and litigious implication.
Anonymous warnings are suspect in so many ways that most people just wipe them out of their memory. Indeed, if you have solid proof that Solstice had cheated you out of your legal earnings, signing your name after this post would only help your case - not expose you to litigation.
Solstice would not - could not - file any legal suit against you if you, indeed, had proof of sales, as your statement here says. If that is the case, and you have tangible proof of sales, then any decent lawyer would take up your side of the lawsuit, with no retainer and legal fees paid only when the lawyer wins the case -- which he/she surely would...if things are as you say.
The only time "litigious" element enters the picture is when the author makes false claims and issues defamatory statements about the said publisher. Or when the author does not have any proof of sales and only believes he should have...or any combination of the two. Then I'd understand anonymity and litigious implication.