Does a story have to be simply possible? Or does it need to be probable too? Does it have to be the most likely course of events given the historical record, or just one of the possibilites?
I'm working on the Diamond Necklace Affair as some of you know. The story I'm writing is entirely possible: I've followed the written accounts as best I could given that they contradict themselves no less each other. It's plausible: the character conforms more or less to the historical character and the things that I added in my story are things that she would not have revealed at trial. However, it's not probable: the end result doesn't seem like the likeliest scenario, but it COULD have happened.
When writing/reading, are you put off if a story doesn't seem probable? Or are you intrigued by the fact that it's possible?
I'm working on the Diamond Necklace Affair as some of you know. The story I'm writing is entirely possible: I've followed the written accounts as best I could given that they contradict themselves no less each other. It's plausible: the character conforms more or less to the historical character and the things that I added in my story are things that she would not have revealed at trial. However, it's not probable: the end result doesn't seem like the likeliest scenario, but it COULD have happened.
When writing/reading, are you put off if a story doesn't seem probable? Or are you intrigued by the fact that it's possible?