Hooters is a brand name, too, but it certainly conjures up associations... esp. when worn as a logo across the chest.
And I don't think owning track suits means a person is more active anymore than merely owning a treadmill does. I think track suits are new-comfy form of sweat suits.
I don't care for things written in large letters across the butt. Word tees, I'm not so bothered by them-- but if it's something suggestive written across boobs, then it's a little different than a unisex tee shirt with a non-suggestive brand name. I know it's the style-- I don't really give a flying fig about 'the style'. I think super-low rise jeans on prepubsecents who don't even have anything to shave in order to wear them are wrong, regardless of 'the style'. Funny thing is, where I buy my jeans, there are racks of jeans that sit extra low and there are also racks of jeans that sit at the hips or even above the hips. And this is in the juniors dept. (Yes, I shop in juniors. It's a long rant, don't ask.) So, just because something is in style doesn't mean it's the only thing to buy.
If appearance didn't matter in first impressions, why are we supposed to dress up for interviews...?