- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 8,142
- Reaction score
- 2,669
- Location
- In cahoots with the other boo-birds
- Website
- www.staciakane.com
I will state, that since I joined here, to provide clear up the libel that was printed about me, I have been attacked constantly for my decision to go with the press that has offered me the most of what I believe is important to me.
So be it.
I don't think anyone has attacked you; in fact, most posters here have gone out of their way to say this thread isn't about you, and that no one is attacking you. We're simply interested in getting the facts about this small press. You could offer up some concrete facts, if you wanted; perhaps that would help everyone to better understand your decision, but no one is attacking you for that decision. We're disgreeing with you on things like the facts about copyright law; that is still not an attack on you or your decision.
I have been harassed in regards to particulars of my contact. Is that standard around here? If so, should I ask for the particulars of your contracts?
I don't see where you've been harrassed, I see where you've been asked questions. And several of us have given you particulars on some things, as well. If you choose not to answer those questions, that is of course your prerogative, but don't blame us then for still wondering what the answers to those questions are.
If this is a place for an exchange of ideas I have not seen it. I have only seen fictionalized facts about the publisher I'm with.
Perhaps if you visited some other areas in the forum and became more familiar with AW as a whole, you'd feel a little more comfortable?
What fictionalized facts are those?
I will say it again and again. They are new to Canada. They do not have a shoe-string budget. I am exceedingly well taken care of by them in ALL aspects. My IP Councilor has stated "In reading through this contract, I have to say that this is the most straightforward, fairest contract I've read. There isn't anything that I'd say needs to be "changed"."
And that's great. No one here wants to see you treated badly. I'm amazed at someone saying nothing in the contract needs to be changed; I've never in my life heard of a publishing contract that doesn't have a single problem, as the interests of the publisher and the author do not always coincide (option clauses, length of term, which rights are being granted, etc. etc.).
I was approached by others in regards to my book, and I chose the best one for me. Everyone will go with whomever they will for whatever reasons they will. I'm exceedingly blessed with NB. Obviously that is not good enough for folks who do not know me. Fine.
We're not criticizing you. We're simply asking questions, that's all.
In regards to repaying advances, I've heard such things written in different books, at writing seminars, articles and from other authors. And before you decide to nit pick at this statement, as I'm sure that you will, I am not going to feed into your disbelief. I have my information, regardless as to whether or not it's contrary to yours. Everyone's contract with their publisher is different. There is no standard contract and what is involved in one's contract will be dependent upon how well or poorly the contract is negotiated.
Keep in mind, it's very easy for someone to call themselves a "published author" or to claim expertise in the publishing industry, and not all of those people are. Lots of those people have a reason for feeding misinformation to others; lots of them hope to make money by doing so. Next time someone tells you things like that, check their credentials carefully. We dealt in another thread with a man who gave tons of writing seminars and told falsehoods like the "You have to pay back your advance" one. He was vanity-published and had never had any dealings with legitimate publishing. So it's a very confusing world out there--the purpose of this board, in fact, is to make it less so.
Nonetheless, while you're right that there's no "standard" contract (or rather, there is--it's called "boilerplate", but most of the time certain things are negotiated), the idea that an advance needs to be paid back if a book doesn't earn out is, quite simply, FALSE. 100%, completely and fully untrue. Anyone who tells you advances need to be paid back if the book doesn't earn out is NOT telling you the truth.
This isn't about "feeding into disbelief"; it is about a lie you have been told. Please do not believe that lie. A publisher who asks for the advance back if the book doesn't earn out is not legitimate. Period.
And again, I guess you don't want to "feed into our disbelief" by telling us where you got this information, and who told it to you. That would actually be helpful, if you would tell us; it would give us a chance to see whose authority is being put against ours. So what we have here is a situation where Victoria, Cathy, myself, and several other writers, all published with major houses, are telling you advances do not have to be paid back; whereas you claim it does based on some nameless people's books and seminars. Surely you can see how it would strengthen your case if you gave us names?
I really genuinely wish you the best of luck. Nobody here wants to see you or any other writer get hurt; that's why we're here. Really, please spend some time elsewhere on the forum and see what we're all about before you decide we're a bunch of mean, nasty haters. We'd love to have you hang around.