Irrational hatred of prologues?

Status
Not open for further replies.

little_e

Trust: that most precious coin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
508
Location
USA
Honestly, it's probably because *most* prologues they've encountered are bad. I think there is something about prologues that attracts aspiring writers like moths to flames--they've read a bunch of books with prologues, and so they put one in their own--but almost every single aspiring novel I've read that opened with a prologue could have been immediately improved simply by cutting it.

That doesn't mean you can't write a great prologue. It just means that it may take more skill than people necessarily realize--and it's entirely possible that the books in the store didn't have prologues when they first came across the editor's desk.
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
Honestly, it's probably because *most* prologues they've encountered are bad. I think there is something about prologues that attracts aspiring writers like moths to flames--they've read a bunch of books with prologues, and so they put one in their own--but almost every single aspiring novel I've read that opened with a prologue could have been immediately improved simply by cutting it.

That doesn't mean you can't write a great prologue. It just means that it may take more skill than people necessarily realize--and it's entirely possible that the books in the store didn't have prologues when they first came across the editor's desk.

This. Gillian Mear's most recent book has a brilliant prologue. Only it's called a preamble.

ETA: The rest of the book is brilliant, too...
 

Cacophony

Hashtag
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
99
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, B.C.
I've never been a fan of the prologue and I tend not to read them. I generally skip forewords, afterwords, acknowledgements and author's notes as well. I made a promise to myself that if I ever started a story with a prologue I would bin the lot of it and start something else. I shouldn't have to tell you a story to set up my story. Everything outside of the first and last chapter is superfluous.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
For aspiring writers, especially aspiring Fantasy writers, who are congenitally predisposed to crave prologues:

The prologue should be the last thing you write, produced only after your narrative is finished, and you find an actual viable reader-friendly need for one. Starting your writing process with a prologue is a recipe for info-dump, pure and simple.

caw
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
I've never been a fan of the prologue and I tend not to read them. I generally skip forewords, afterwords, acknowledgements and author's notes as well. I made a promise to myself that if I ever started a story with a prologue I would bin the lot of it and start something else. I shouldn't have to tell you a story to set up my story. Everything outside of the first and last chapter is superfluous.

I don't get this at all. Why wouldn't you read them? It's like a little insight into the creation of the book...

As for not reading the prologue - the writer wrote it. I'll read it.
 

Cacophony

Hashtag
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
99
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, B.C.
I can appreciate the purpose they serve, but to be completely honest, it doesn't interest me and takes away from the feeling of urgency that I get when I pick up a book for the first time. I don't want to read about the author's journey in finding the voice of the protagonist or how his/her spouse was supportive and encouraging or how the character of Paul reflects your inner child. I'm just not that interested. I want the story and I'm not inclined to wait while you talk about it. I'm not against them. I just don't read them.
 

little_e

Trust: that most precious coin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
508
Location
USA
I don't get this at all. Why wouldn't you read them? It's like a little insight into the creation of the book...

As for not reading the prologue - the writer wrote it. I'll read it.
I see most acknowledgments as more of a conversation between the author and a few people to whom they're grateful, rather than intended for me (or the rest of the audience).

I tend to read them anyway, but then, I tend to read the indexes, too.

But I've only read one acknowledgment so far that I actually enjoyed.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I don't get this at all. Why wouldn't you read them?

I always do, and always with a shudder, and usually it's an appropriate response. Too damn many times it's made me not want to read further.

It's like a little insight into the creation of the book...

I only want "a little insight into the creation of the book" after I've read the book and really enjoyed the experience.

caw
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
I see most acknowledgments as more of a conversation between the author and a few people to whom they're grateful, rather than intended for me (or the rest of the audience). .

Well, so do I. But I'm nosey like that, and hey, if they leave it lying around...


I tend to read them anyway, but then, I tend to read the indexes, too. .

Exactly.

But I've only read one acknowledgment so far that I actually enjoyed .

I've read so many that I've enjoyed... 'Swhy I keep reading them, I guess.

I only want "a little insight into the creation of the book" after I've read the book and really enjoyed the experience.
I guess I always start out expecting I'll like it. So sue me ;)
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
I don't want to read about the author's journey in finding the voice of the protagonist or how his/her spouse was supportive and encouraging or how the character of Paul reflects your inner child. I'm just not that interested. I want the story and I'm not inclined to wait while you talk about it. I'm not against them. I just don't read them.

I don't mean that kind of acknowledgement. The ones I like (and remember) tend to say things like "To Jon and the spirit of little Joss, who was born there". That adds quite a lot for me - at the very least, if I don't know the author yet, it makes me want to learn more about them and about why they wrote this book for Jon and the spirit of little Joss and what it means to say "he was born there" - the book in question being my grandmother's first edition of Rumer Godden's Rungli Rungliot: first "grownup" book I ever read.

And perhaps that's part of it for me - that sense that the writer was treating the reader (little eight-year-old I) to a grown-up conversation - back in the days when grown-ups and children didn't talk all that much as equals...?

Maybe that's it.

Anyway, I'm grateful. :)
 

Fallen

Stood at the coalface
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
5,500
Reaction score
1,957
Website
www.jacklpyke.com
I don't get this at all. Why wouldn't you read them? It's like a little insight into the creation of the book...

As for not reading the prologue - the writer wrote it. I'll read it.

I know how you feel, m. I read a book cover-to-cover.
 

Buffysquirrel

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
6,137
Reaction score
694
Lol, I'm more often to be found paging through the book looking for the place where the story starts.
 

Toothpaste

THE RECKLESS RESCUE is out now!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
8,745
Reaction score
3,096
Location
Toronto, Canada
Website
www.adriennekress.com
For aspiring writers, especially aspiring Fantasy writers, who are congenitally predisposed to crave prologues:

The prologue should be the last thing you write, produced only after your narrative is finished, and you find an actual viable reader-friendly need for one. Starting your writing process with a prologue is a recipe for info-dump, pure and simple.

caw

It's taken, I believe, thousands of threads about prologues for someone to write an explanation this clear and simple, but this. A million times this.
 

willietheshakes

Gentleman. Scholar. Bastard.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
726
Location
Semi-sunny Victoria BC
It's taken, I believe, thousands of threads about prologues for someone to write an explanation this clear and simple, but this. A million times this.

From John Steinbeck, in 1952:

As you know, a prologue is written last but placed first to explain the book's shortcomings and to ask the reader to be kind. But a prologue is also a note of farewell from the writer to his book. For years the writer and his book have been together—friends or bitter enemies but very close as only love and fighting can accomplish.

Then suddenly the book is done. It is a kind of death. This is the requiem.


(from his letter to his editor, at Letters of Note.)
 

richcapo

Knight Templar
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
953
Reaction score
49
Location
Fairfax, Virginia
I love prologues. I even have a cutesie little pettie pet pet name for them: Chapter One.
 

Nistarn

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
59
Reaction score
5
Location
Lisbon
Website
nistarn.deviantart.com
Newbie talking here

I had a friend reading my first lines and she quit before she met the main character.

The way I saw it:

"Hey, I finished my book. Here, have a look. Don't mind me," I just stared back at her. She read about the terrifying assault of vicious creatures to a helpless lovely woman living in a tree house. The lovely character is scared for her son. He is not in the house, but she finds out she is not alone when evil comes inside.... Muahahaha. Now she can never let it go....I keep staring at her, thinking I have achieved glory.

The way she saw it:

"What? Is this boy ( mentioned and absent from his room) the main character and he isn’t even here for the action?”
“Well, he will get there next, you'll see…”
There is nothing to see… she left.


Now I write in another language.



Write the prologue, rename it, and if it isn’t good erase it. Just don’t quit.


Regarding the million times a topic is discussed, I speak for the little ones such as me, who are so overwhelmed by this forum that have to keep up with you.
 

thothguard51

A Gentleman of a refined age...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
1,064
Age
72
Location
Out side the beltway...
The number of unpublished novels that have prologues that don't work and are totally unnecessary is high. By the time novels get to the publication stage, the unnecessary prologues have generally been jettisoned by editors, and the prologues that remain are the ones that work.

This, a thousand times...

Well said Ice Cream girl...
 

fredXgeorge

I heart sexy elves and wizards.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
944
Reaction score
81
Location
Australia
I don't get this at all. Why wouldn't you read them? It's like a little insight into the creation of the book...

As for not reading the prologue - the writer wrote it. I'll read it.
I read acknowledgments too. And then imagine myself writing one for when I get published ;)
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Further comment on the craving for prologues:

If you find yourself, at the beginning of the novel-writing process, desperate to produce a prologue, go down to the liquor store, get a bottle of Talisker, bring it home, sip a wee dram, neat, then sit down at your computer and have Character X kill Character Y in some delightfully gruesome way. You don't need a reason. Neither does the reader. That can all be worked out later. The working-out-later part is called THE STORY.

Which is exactly why you don't need to write a prologue at the beginning, and quite possibly won't need one at all.

caw
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
That's fine, blacbird - you don't like prologues. No-one's going to make you write one. You don't even have to read one if you don't like. You can settle down now.
 

Sirion

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
157
Location
Ann Arbor, MI
If a prologue is well written and enhances the work, I think most agents (and readers) won't mind them.

Of course, you could say the same thing about anything in a novel.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
That's fine, blacbird - you don't like prologues. No-one's going to make you write one. You don't even have to read one if you don't like. You can settle down now.

You miss my point. I don't categorically dislike prologues. I've read prologues that work, very well. But I've read far more prologues, in manuscripts, that just plain suck, for a variety of reasons. And I'm convinced they suck largely because the writers wrote them before they wrote the actual story. It shows, every damn time. The worst of them, and the most common, are pure and simple info-dumps. Which are the first symptom of a writer not trusting the readers: I just gotta explain stuff, or nobody will get it.

Which generates my primary caution: No, you don't. Readers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay smarter than you think they are, IF you've written a damgood story.

So, go write a damgood story. Worry about the prologue after you've done that. If it's necessary, write one. If not . . . for Godsake, don't. Try not to be a pretentious imbecile. Leave that to people like me, who aspire to write "literary" fiction, and aren't good enough writers to write good genre fiction.

caw
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,213
Reaction score
15,828
Location
Australia.
You miss my point. I don't categorically dislike prologues. I've read prologues that work, very well. But I've read far more prologues, in manuscripts, that just plain suck, for a variety of reasons. And I'm convinced they suck largely because the writers wrote them before they wrote the actual story. It shows, every damn time. The worst of them, and the most common, are pure and simple info-dumps. Which are the first symptom of a writer not trusting the readers: I just gotta explain stuff, or nobody will get it.

Which generates my primary caution: No, you don't. Readers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay smarter than you think they are, IF you've written a damgood story.

So, go write a damgood story. Worry about the prologue after you've done that. If it's necessary, write one. If not . . . for Godsake, don't. Try not to be a pretentious imbecile. Leave that to people like me, who aspire to write "literary" fiction, and aren't good enough writers to write good genre fiction.

caw

Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.