• Basic Writing questions is not a crit forum. All crits belong in Share Your Work

Paragraph Form/Structure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hummingbird

Pen, Paper, Prepared. ...Write!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
445
Reaction score
82
Location
Glued to my computer screen.
I have noticed something in my writing that I'm not sure is common or the best. So I thought I'd ask. ;)

There are times when I write a dialogue sentence, an action, a dialogue sentence, another action, and another dialogue sentence.

Like this:

"Really? You think so?" Lisa spun, holding her skirt. "I hoped it looked okay." She looked at the ground and blushed. "I bought it just for tonight."

That is how I have been writing some of my paragraphs. In the books I have read it seems it is most common to have the action in the middle of the paragraph and any dialogue in the start and/or end of the paragraph.
Would paragraphs switching back and forth from dialogue and action be confusing to the reader? Or is it okay to use as long as I try to make sure my sentence-types sound different? Perhaps a third option is I am worrying for nothing...? ;)

Thanks for any help!
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
As long as you are dealing with a single speaker, this structure is fine. The standard convention in dialogue sequences is to go to a new paragraph when there's a different speaker. If you intend a pause, you might want to indicate that by starting a new paragraph, but otherwise, this example looks proper.

caw
 

Hummingbird

Pen, Paper, Prepared. ...Write!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
445
Reaction score
82
Location
Glued to my computer screen.
Awesome, thank you! Yes, I only do that with one speaker. I was prepared to have to start teaching myself to stop doing that.

I am so relieved. :D Thank you!
 

rwm4768

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
15,472
Reaction score
767
Location
Missouri
You can include interruptions like that in dialogue, but you shouldn't overdo it. Make sure the actions are important. The example you gave felt a little bit awkward to me. It had a sort of staccato rhythm.
 

Anna Spargo-Ryan

Just pokin' about
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
1,703
Reaction score
333
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Website
blog.annaspargoryan.com
You can include interruptions like that in dialogue, but you shouldn't overdo it. Make sure the actions are important. The example you gave felt a little bit awkward to me. It had a sort of staccato rhythm.

I agree, I would have structured it more like this:

Lisa's skirt lifted as she spun*. "Really, you think so? I hoped it looked okay." She dropped her eyes, blushing. "I bought it just for tonight."

* or some other action
 

kuwisdelu

Revolutionize the World
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
38,197
Reaction score
4,544
Location
The End of the World
It's fine, and personally, I like the beats in your original structure.

But I agree with others. Don't overdo it.

Maybe break up the speaker's actions with reactions in a new paragraph.
 

JadeVarden

Registered
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Location
Louisville, KY
Obviously I haven't read your writing, but if you use the same pattern constantly the prose might become boring. Mix it up, too, just to change the rhythm. But grammatically, your natural rhythm is fine.
 

kkbe

Huh.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
5,773
Reaction score
1,687
Location
Left of center
Website
kkelliewriteme.wordpress.com
Agree. One thing I noticed reading a couple of Lee Child/Jack Reachers, Child (or the editor/publisher) consistently removed subsequent action from dialogue. Applying this to Hummingbird's example:

"Really? You think so?"
Lisa spun, holding her skirt.

In the case of those Child novels, I'd read dialogue, think that part was done, then here would come a descriptor relative to that dialogue, but kept apart from it for some reason. It bugged me.

I'm describing it poorly but do you know what I mean?
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
I'm not at all fond of using action twice in the same dialogue paragraph. There's no real rule against it, but it becomes very tedious reading if done too often.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
I don't like it when I find descriptors of how something is said or even who said it at the end of several lines of a character's dialogue. It's too late to tell me that after I have read the dialogue.

Is that what you meant?

But I can't think of any reason why an action shouldn't appear after a character's dialogue provided the dialogue itself is the stimulus for that action.

But I agree, normally action comes before dialogue if the action and dialogue are in response to the same stimulus.

If the stimulus is say the character unexpectedly touches something hot, for instance, the four reactions in sequence will be sensation and realisation of burning and the removal of the character's hand from the heat source followed by any spoken curse. The writer may choose to use less than all four of these responses/reactions, but whichever ones he does use should still follow that sequence.


Agree. One thing I noticed reading a couple of Lee Child/Jack Reachers, Child (or the editor/publisher) consistently removed subsequent action from dialogue. Applying this to Hummingbird's example:

"Really? You think so?"
Lisa spun, holding her skirt.

In the case of those Child novels, I'd read dialogue, think that part was done, then here would come a descriptor relative to that dialogue, but kept apart from it for some reason. It bugged me.

I'm describing it poorly but do you know what I mean?
 

ZoeYork

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
104
Reaction score
7
Location
London, Ontario
Website
www.zoeyork.com
Another tip that I've been given, and has made sense for me so far, is to end the paragraph with what is most important - sometimes that's the dialogue, other times the action.

I don't mind the back and forth, although it's not how I write, and if it works for your readers, that's the only answer you need. But if you get feedback from your readers that they are looking for more description, then you might have your answer - what you've written could be flushed into two paragraphs, maybe.

It's really hard to talk about based on one sentence, of course!
 

kkbe

Huh.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
5,773
Reaction score
1,687
Location
Left of center
Website
kkelliewriteme.wordpress.com
I don't like it when I find descriptors of how something is said or even who said it at the end of several lines of a character's dialogue. It's too late to tell me that after I have read the dialogue.

Is that what you meant?

But I can't think of any reason why an action shouldn't appear after a character's dialogue provided the dialogue itself is the stimulus for that action.

But I agree, normally action comes before dialogue if the action and dialogue are in response to the same stimulus.
Bufty, thanks for responding. Problem is, I just looked in three Reacher novels for great examples and you'd have to know I can't find one.

All I can say is, I remember thinking (over and over) why isn't that line on the end of the line above? Why is it a new paragraph? Makes no sense.

You said it as I wish I had, Bufty: The dialogue was the stimulus for the action, so the two should have been together. They weren't.
 

Mike_Gasaway

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
81
Reaction score
3
Location
Columbus, OH
Website
www.gasmangroup.com
Mine is all about flow. How it feels. Sentences and paragraphs are formed that way.
Put them together if they FEEL like they should be together.

That goes hand in hand with what everyone is saying but may give a reason for it - the idea of not overusing it.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
The evidence disappears - doesn't that always happen? ;)

By 'after' I simply meant it came after - not necessarily immediately following in the same paragraph. That would depend upon context.

Bufty, thanks for responding. Problem is, I just looked in three Reacher novels for great examples and you'd have to know I can't find one.

All I can say is, I remember thinking (over and over) why isn't that line on the end of the line above? Why is it a new paragraph? Makes no sense.

You said it as I wish I had, Bufty: The dialogue was the stimulus for the action, so the two should have been together. They weren't.
 

charmingbillie

Are we there yet?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
230
Reaction score
664
What you have is fine, though I agree with others that you'll want to vary your structure as you go.

One thing I keep in mind is that a lot of people are skim readers. That's one reason for the dialogue paragraph, action paragraph format. Like:

"What are you talking about?"

I stood up straight and glared at him.

Likewise, if you bury dialogue in the middle of a paragraph, I always feel like some people (like me at times) will miss it. It's why I don't have long single paragraphs too (though often they turn out to be longer than I'd thought they were).

So, some additional things to keep in mind.
 

onesecondglance

pretending to be awake
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,359
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Berkshire, UK
Website
soundcloud.com
I mentally "hear" pauses in the dialogue when you break for action.

So I imagine an entirely different speech pattern between:
He winced at the screeches wafting over from the karaoke booth. "This is why I normally don't drink here," he said.
and
"This," he said, wincing at the screeches watching over from the karaoke booth, "is why I don't normally drink here."

Worth bearing in mind if you want to give emphasis to certain words (or might have accidentally placed some there without meaning to).
 

Corinne Duyvis

My New Cat Is Too Big for Shoulders
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 7, 2010
Messages
884
Reaction score
107
Location
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Website
www.corinneduyvis.com
Splitting up the action like that is something I usually find myself pointing out to CPs, since for me, as a reader, it's grating to bounce back and forth like that. It doesn't make for a smooth read, IMO. Personally, I try to group dialogue together as much as I can.

Then, when the action is shoved together as well, it often seems extraneous and I'll cut half of it. Too often, action during dialogue only exists to stop the characters from talking in a blank space, and not because it adds something to the scene. I think that results in cleaner, streamlined conversations.

The above is ENTIRELY PERSONAL, though. As you can see from this thread, plenty of people feel differently. Try to hone your own ear. Read your writing aloud. Study books you love and pay attention to how they do it. Then read those passages aloud, too.

Another tip that I've been given, and has made sense for me so far, is to end the paragraph with what is most important - sometimes that's the dialogue, other times the action.

I love this tip and I try to keep it in mind as well.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,079
Reaction score
10,775
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
I think what you've done is fine. But it is okay to have dialog that's "tagged" or that has action at the beginning or ending as well, and of course to have dialog that is just dialog with no intervening actions or tags, so long as it's clear to the reader who is speaking and what the setting is.

Having an action inserted in the middle of two things the same speaker says implies (to me at least) that she performed the action during the pause in speaking.

"I want to show you something," Susan removed a box from the top drawer of her desk, "that's been in my family for generations." She flicked the catch with one finger, and the box popped open, revealing a shimmering dagger.

If she performs the action first, it implies she did it before speaking and so on.

You don't want long, unbroken talking head passages with no description or action. You also don't want description or action to be so pervasive or repeated that it is distracting or focuses the reader on the wrong thing.

I think a bit of variation in the rhythm is your friend here.
 

Hummingbird

Pen, Paper, Prepared. ...Write!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
445
Reaction score
82
Location
Glued to my computer screen.
Thank you very much to everyone who has responded! This gives me much to think about. I do not use this format often, and the sample paragraph was just something I made up for this post so I did not put much thought into it.

I also like the idea of putting the important stuff last.

I was not thinking about people skimming through the reading either. I can see where stuff could get lost in paragraphs like that to a skimming reader.

I'll play around with how I'm wording things and see what happens. When I am rewriting everything I will see how many of those paragraphs I can reword, but I won't be too concerned if I end up leaving a few like that.

Thank you so much everyone!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.