Laurie Rosin, instead of getting all hurt and defensive (which is understandable), I'd suggest you take a good, close look at what people on this forum have said regarding your website and adjust accordingly:
1. "No real editor claims the books she has edited (in any form: copyediting, line-editing, developmental editing, acquisitions) to be "books published by {name of editor}" -- the author and publisher are the published; the editor is simply the editor." If you have published books you've written, not simply edited, fantastic! Make it clear.
2. "What background does she have for editing? Any background information is notably absent in her bio." This sounds like a perfect time to add an easy-to-find bio with very specific (and independently verifiable) information to your website.
3. "No references from in-house editors, no references from publishers, no references to her "success" rate (how many books get published? that may account for the 4-5 books/year ratio I noted previously), only references from unknown "authors"." All good things to add, if they're available and verifiable.
Coming here and screaming about the unfairness of it all does you no good. Neither does telling us to "come to the source". If we don't know you, and we are here to find out if anyone's had experience with you be it good or bad, why would we trust your self-reporting? It's a sad fact, but many authors are scammed by so-called "editors" and "agents" who had glib answers to tough questions. Our only method of protecting ourselves is to go outside the source for information.
This could become an excellent business opportunity for you, as addressing authors' concerns up front on your website will allay many fears and empower authors to do enough research on you to feel comfortable using your services, which is no small thing in this industry. If your credentials are valid, you have nothing to fear from this forum.