Been there, have the bloodied T-shirt. Editors adding their own "spin" on stories/articles is nothing new.
So not new, in fact, that there's a section in the copyright law to cover who owns editorial wording additions (the editor does).
I'm sorry the edits weren't to your liking.
Most of the editors I've worked have run edits past me, but a few have added wording. I was once really confused about a negative review of a short I wrote in an anthology, because it referenced specific, rather cheesy wording in the story that I knew I'd never use. I looked in my manuscript and no, I hadn't said that. But then I opened the cover of the final book and . . . Crap!! Sure enough, the story said that! I proceeded to
for a day. But you have to let it go. It'll eat you up otherwise. Take a deep breath, let it out slow, and move on with the knowledge that there might be plenty of people who will LIKE the new wording. Turns out (for me anyway) that equally as many reviews loved the language the editor added.
It's all part of the game. Own the story proudly and feel free to link to it. It shows good grace and remember that you might wind up with fans because of what doesn't appeal to you right now.