Mistrial in case of LGBT murder

Maxinquaye

That cheeky buggerer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
10,361
Reaction score
1,032
Location
In your mind
Website
maxoneverything.wordpress.com
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/09/01/california.gay.student.murder/
Los Angeles (CNN) -- A judge declared a mistrial Thursday after jurors said they were hopelessly deadlocked in the murder trial of a teenager accused of gunning down a gay classmate in their Southern California classroom.

Ventura County Superior Court confirmed the ruling in the eight-week trial of Brandon McInerney, who was 14 at the time of the shooting in 2008.

I don't really know why the jury couldn't find the killer guilty after he shot the 15 year old Lawrence King in the head in a class room in front of everyone. I have my suspicions, of course, because I'm fairly cynical.

A case of gay panic defence working?
 

Shadow Dragon

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
4,773
Reaction score
261
Location
In the land of dragons
Regardless of this specific trial, shouldn't they charge him with bringing a gun onto school property? That alone should have a pretty hefty penalty.

And according to the what the defense lawyer said:
The defense contended McInerney had a violent upbringing. It also argued that King taunted and flirted with McInerney, ultimately sparking the fatal confrontation, KTLA reported.

it looks like gay panic is one of the defenses for his actions.
 

SPMiller

Prodigiously Hanged
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
11,525
Reaction score
1,988
Age
41
Location
Dallas
Website
seanpatrickmiller.com
Like Williebee, I'm tempted to blame the judge absent further information. Trial judges are really fucking prickly about their own little interpretations of laws.
 

Swordswoman

Resilient and kind
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
687
Reaction score
464
Location
UK
The judges have little choice in their interpretation of the laws in this case. This is California, and the 'Gay Panic Defence' has already been ruled unlawful there in the 2006 Gwen Araujo Justice for Victims Act (AB1160).

This discussion on FDL claims the prosecution admitted this and the judge read the jury the relevant clause, but I can find no official conformation of that. The mainstream US press is (as usual) largely silent on the issue and we have to comb the blogs for the facts needed to comment.

I'll comment as an outsider, though. I'll comment and say 'homophobic bullshit'. I'd say more, but it makes me feel too bloody sick.
 

Maxinquaye

That cheeky buggerer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
10,361
Reaction score
1,032
Location
In your mind
Website
maxoneverything.wordpress.com
I'd sure like to know what the instructions to the jury were, if only to know what they are actually "deadlocked" on.

Yeah, I'd like to see that too. But are jury instructions and such part of the public record? Are deliberations part of the public record?

Will they be retrying the case?

I don't know. I've heard about this case before, but haven't followed it. I just saw it last night on my Google News roundup. It was to late to go digging further. CNN seemed a reasonably "authoritative" source to link, and it doesn't say.

I'll comment as an outsider, though. I'll comment and say 'homophobic bullshit'. I'd say more, but it makes me feel too bloody sick.

I think, though that's speculation on my part, that the gay panic will be the reason for the deadlock.
 

Torgo

Formerly Phantom of Krankor.
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
7,632
Reaction score
1,204
Location
London, UK
Website
torgoblog.blogspot.com
You can shoot people in the head for flirting with you now, and people off the street will sympathise? Shit.
 

Maxinquaye

That cheeky buggerer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
10,361
Reaction score
1,032
Location
In your mind
Website
maxoneverything.wordpress.com
Well, I wouldn't worry.

You can stab us forty times, hang us on fences after being whipped to death, and some people will still think it was justified because you know the victim blinked at you funny.

Sorry, these kinds of stories make me depressed and sarcastic. Not aimed at anyone in this thread though, just a casual black remark before I hit the Jack Daniels.
 

Maxinquaye

That cheeky buggerer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
10,361
Reaction score
1,032
Location
In your mind
Website
maxoneverything.wordpress.com
How stupid.

First degree murder, life in prison and throw away the key.

The justice system continues to astonish me.

:(

Not really the justice system. It's the good old society, civilisation, the responsible adults in the community. You know. The community is often much more dangerous to gay people than the nebulous, distant and far-away governments.
 

Sheryl Nantus

Holding out for a Superhero...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
7,196
Reaction score
1,634
Age
59
Location
Brownsville, Pennsylvania. Or New Babbage, Second
Website
www.sherylnantus.com
Well, I wouldn't worry.

You can stab us forty times, hang us on fences after being whipped to death, and some people will still think it was justified because you know the victim blinked at you funny.

Sorry, these kinds of stories make me depressed and sarcastic. Not aimed at anyone in this thread though, just a casual black remark before I hit the Jack Daniels.

{{{hugs}}}

I'd be proud to have a drink with you anytime, anywhere.

We should hit the Toronto Pride parade sometime. It's a great party.

I'll even go topless.

;)
 

Calla Lily

On hiatus
Staff member
Super Moderator
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
39,307
Reaction score
17,490
Location
Non carborundum illegitimi
Website
www.aliceloweecey.net
{{{hugs}}}

I'd be proud to have a drink with you anytime, anywhere.

We should hit the Toronto Pride parade sometime. It's a great party.

I'll even go topless.

;)

+1

Well, except for the topless part. I passed the point where I could go topless in public about 30 years ago. :scared:
 

Bookewyrme

Imagined half of it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
4,859
Reaction score
408
Location
Home Sweet Home
Website
bookewyrme.straydreamers.com
You can stab us forty times, hang us on fences after being whipped to death, and some people will still think it was justified because you know the victim blinked at you funny.

Well, you know Max, blinking is terribly provocative. I mean, if a gay person blinks at you enough, it can turn you gay! I know it must be true, because my cousin's ex-husband's college room-mate's brother's friend turned gay when a dude wearing a pink shirt blinked at him.

(I don't really need the sarcasm sign, do I?)

****

So, what I've never understood about the "Gay Panic" defense is...normally if you kill someone the only way to get out of it is by proving it was self-defense (or in some states a home invasion, i.e. Castle Doctrine). And even if you prove it was self-defense, you have to show that you were in real danger for your life, and that you only used as much force as the other person was going to use on you. Using that as a basis for logic, I don't understand how "he was flirting with me, yer honor!" can translate into justification for deadly force in any sane person's mind. I mean, shouldn't flirting translate into you're only allowed to flirt back or something?
 

Xelebes

Delerium ex Ennui
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
14,205
Reaction score
884
Location
Edmonton, Canada
Well, you know Max, blinking is terribly provocative. I mean, if a gay person blinks at you enough, it can turn you gay! I know it must be true, because my cousin's ex-husband's college room-mate's brother's friend turned gay when a dude wearing a pink shirt blinked at him.

(I don't really need the sarcasm sign, do I?)

****

So, what I've never understood about the "Gay Panic" defense is...normally if you kill someone the only way to get out of it is by proving it was self-defense (or in some states a home invasion, i.e. Castle Doctrine). And even if you prove it was self-defense, you have to show that you were in real danger for your life, and that you only used as much force as the other person was going to use on you. Using that as a basis for logic, I don't understand how "he was flirting with me, yer honor!" can translate into justification for deadly force in any sane person's mind. I mean, shouldn't flirting translate into you're only allowed to flirt back or something?

What gay panic is is a temporary insanity defense.
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
What gay panic is is a temporary insanity defense.
'Gay panic' and 'hate crime' seem to me to be codependent and synergistic terms. 'Gay panic' has validity only within a framework that recognizes the concept of a 'hate crime.'
 

Maxinquaye

That cheeky buggerer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
10,361
Reaction score
1,032
Location
In your mind
Website
maxoneverything.wordpress.com
Gay panic is when you get away with going into your English class, put two bullets in the brain of your classmate in front of the teacher and the other students, and then claim 'he made a pass at me!' Hate crime is a consideration in sentencing, and doesn't do anything for the prosecution stage.
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
Gay panic is when you get away with going into your English class, put two bullets in the brain of your classmate in front of the teacher and the other students, and then claim 'he made a pass at me!' Hate crime is a consideration in sentencing, and doesn't do anything for the prosecution stage.
Yeah, that's why I called them codependent and synergistic terms and not synonyms. :)