Reader says sentence feels awkward: thoughts?

Emerson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
108
Reaction score
6
Location
Pittsburgh
Hi,

I let my girlfriend read a bit of something I wrote, and she said there was a sentence that she found awkward. I personally don't see anything wrong with it, but I'd appreciate other thoughts on it.

He must have lived in town for six months or so before he had a word for Joseph, and when he did it was just a friendly “Morning,” as if the two were friends.

She said the phrase "word for" was awkward even though she's heard the expression before, and that she felt the sentence was too long which I don't really agree with.
 

Pegster

Girando e fuzzicando
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
164
Reaction score
19
Location
Winter Park
Hi,


He must have lived in town for six months or so before he had a word for Joseph, and when he did it was just a friendly “Morning,” as if the two were friends.

She said the phrase "word for" was awkward even though she's heard the expression before, and that she felt the sentence was too long which I don't really agree with.

I have to agree with the girlfriend on this one. The 'word for Joseph' suggests he's trying to figure out a way to describe Joseph or define him, when in reality, a 'word from Joseph' would be that 'Morning." It came from Joseph. Different preposition. I hope this helps.
 

Bracken

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
604
Reaction score
61
He must have lived in town for six months or so before he had a word for Joseph, and when he did it was just a friendly “Morning,” as if the two were friends.

He never spoke to Joseph until he'd lived in town for six months or so; when he did, it was just a friendly "Morning".


"As if the two were friends" is redundant and should be cut, since you just stated that the word ("Morning") was in fact friendly.
 

Emerson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
108
Reaction score
6
Location
Pittsburgh
My apologies, more context would have been useful. James is the character who has lived in town for six months before saying anything to Joseph, the main character. So James didn't have a word for Joseph until he said 'morning'. This is obvious in the full text but not at all obvious here.

edit: Good call on the repetition though, thanks.
 
Last edited:

Emerson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
108
Reaction score
6
Location
Pittsburgh
He must have lived in town for six months or so before he said a single word to Joseph, and when he did, it was just a friendly “Morning."
 

KTC

Stand in the Place Where You Live
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
29,138
Reaction score
8,563
Location
Toronto
Website
ktcraig.com
Word for should be word with. I agree that word for is awkward. Makes sense, but it's not the recognized term that word with is. I'm not saying it's right or wrong...just sounds wrong.
 

KTC

Stand in the Place Where You Live
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
29,138
Reaction score
8,563
Location
Toronto
Website
ktcraig.com
I feel like 'word with' implies a conversation though.

and word for sounds like....he couldn't think of what to call him, as in...

He must have lived in town for six months or so before he had a word for Joseph, and then he realized that word was asshole.
 

Emerson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
108
Reaction score
6
Location
Pittsburgh
Yeah, I've come to accept the confusion on that. Anything wrong with the revision I posted a few posts up?
 

Emerson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
108
Reaction score
6
Location
Pittsburgh
Thanks, much appreciated. Just goes to show the value of objective readers. What sounds perfect in my head might sound like absolute nonsense to them.
 

Evonus

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
276
Reaction score
89
Location
Houston, TX
He must have lived in town for six months or so before he said a single word to Joseph, and when he did, it was just a friendly “Morning."

This doesn't seem to be the main focus of this thread, but I feel like the words "or so" disrupt the flow of an already long sentence. You may want to consider deleting them or say "He must have lived in town for about six months before...."
 

WriteStarfish

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
134
Reaction score
4
This doesn't seem to be the main focus of this thread, but I feel like the words "or so" disrupt the flow of an already long sentence. You may want to consider deleting them or say "He must have lived in town for about six months before...."

I agree about the "or so". It seems as if you are trying to emphasize the long period of time that has passed. Perhaps, this could be illustrated through saying something like
James had been in town for half a year before he said a single word to Joseph, and when he did, it was just a friendly “Morning."
 

pegasus

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
132
Reaction score
15
Location
South
She said the phrase "word for" was awkward even though she's heard the expression before, and that she felt the sentence was too long which I don't really agree with.

You weren't, by chance, raised British?

I can't remember hearing 'a word for' in the way you've used it. It sounds kinda British to me.