Verb Tenses

Chrisla

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
49
Location
Northern California
This is a paragraph from my WIP:

The sun finally peeked above the horizon, casting a red glow as it climbed higher. A ray found Sarah’s still form; touched her tangled hair, turning it red-gold; inched up to her face, where it lingered, stroking her bruised jaw; then crept up to her left eye. She stirred and stretched her legs, pushing them deeper into the sleeping bag.

In our writing group, we give printed pages to the others, read the material, then everybody comments. Often, though, they make punctuation or grammar corrections on the pages, without commenting.

Not until I got home and looked through the printed pages they'd returned to me did I discover that each and ever one of them had corrected a verb in that paragraph. Most of them changed "stroking" to "stroked." The English major changed "turning" to "turned."

Will some well-qualified person tell me exactly what is wrong with it as written? I can't see any difference between this paragraph and the sentence: "She altered her dress, making it more stylish," except, of course, that the sentence I used in my WIP is a compound sentence, made up of several like sentences.

Am I wrong? And if I am, will somebody please clarify it for me?
 

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
I believe you are correct, grammatically speaking :)



That's a whole lotta verbs in that piece, though ;)
 

Snick

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
934
Reaction score
86
Location
Havatoo
I believe that your paragraph is correct. I think that it would be better if all of the participles were either present or past. It might be better, if the sentence structure were simpler.
 

bonitakale

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
1,485
Reaction score
165
Location
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Website
www.bkedits.com
I believe that your paragraph is correct. I think that it would be better if all of the participles were either present or past. It might be better, if the sentence structure were simpler.

Yeah, I think your readers were confused by the complicated sentence. The semicolons are technically correct, but they don't quite work, perhaps because the first phrase (found Sarah’s still form) isn't really parallel with the rest. It's more of a generalization that covers or introduces the specifics of where the ray touches her. It would be clearer broken up: A ray found Sarah’s still form. It touched her tangled hair, turning it red-gold; inched up to her face, where it lingered, stroking her bruised jaw; then crept up to her left eye.

(And I tend to think of hair as being above the face, rather than below.)
 

Chase

It Takes All of Us to End Racism
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
9,239
Reaction score
2,316
Location
Oregon, USA
A ray found Sarah’s still form; touched her tangled hair, turning it red-gold; inched up to her face, where it lingered, stroking her bruised jaw; then crept up to her left eye.


As others have said, your choice of verb forms are correct.

You may gave stumbled into a group where members have convinced each other that all "ing" forms are to be avoided on principle. Such things happens.


What amazes me is everyone in your group and (so far) posters here think the semicolon use is okay. If the correct uses of semicolons has changed so radically from when I instructed English, I apologize:

1. For U.S. publications, semicolons separate main clauses.

A ray found Sarah’s still form; touched her tangled hair, turning it red-gold is a main clause. Everything afterward is not a main clause; thus, the semicolon is incorrect.

2. An exception is the use of semicolons separating items in a series after a colon for clarity if one or more items in the series contains commas.

In the sentence above, there's no colon. Semicolons are out of place.

If its construction is meant to be an asyndeton, in which normally occurring conjunctions are intentionally omitted, the semicolons only confuse the construction. Where's the clarity?

I'd also welcome an explanation from those with greater knowledge of U.S. punctuation and grammar.
 

Snick

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
934
Reaction score
86
Location
Havatoo
In U.S. English semicolons can also be used between clauses when there are commas within the clauses. That is to decrease the confusion. I believe that the use of semicolons in the paragraph in question is not wrong, but I do think that the sentence structure should be simplified.

Something like this:
The sun finally peeked above the horizon and cast a red glow as it climbed higher. A ray found Sarah’s still form, touched her tangled hair, and turned it red-gold. The sunlight inched up to her face, where it lingered, stroking her bruised jaw. Then it crept up to her left eye. She stirred and stretched her legs, pushing them deeper into the sleeping bag.
 

Chase

It Takes All of Us to End Racism
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
9,239
Reaction score
2,316
Location
Oregon, USA
In U.S. English semicolons can also be used between clauses when there are commas within the clauses.

I believe the above exception is most often applied to main clauses (independent clauses). However, for this discussion, let's use the definition of any common clause: a group of words containing a subject and finite verb.

Neither "touched her tangled hair, turning it red-gold" nor "inched up to her face, where it lingered, stroking her bruised jaw" nor "then crept up to her left eye" apply.

I dearly love semicolons, but these don't work.

Edit: If I were an editor trying to help a writer not already on several best-seller lists get published, I'd recommend a less controversial construction.
 
Last edited:

Terie

Writer is as Writer does
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
951
Location
Manchester, UK
Website
www.teriegarrison.com
In U.S. English semicolons can also be used between clauses when there are commas within the clauses.

Yep, this is correct. It doesn't matter if a colon is used to introduce the items in a list; if one or more of the items include a comma, semicolons should be used to separate the items instead of commas.

Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary said:
[A s]emicolon separates phrases that contain commas.

The country's resources consist of large ore deposits; lumber, waterpower, and fertile soils; and a strong, rugged people.

Send copies to our offices in Portland, Maine; Springfield, Illinois; and Savannah, Georgia.​

As for the OP's question, the verb tenses are correct. But even though the punctuation is also correct, it's not effective for today's style. I love semicolons when they're used correctly, but that paragraph puts me off. The complex structure makes it feel overwritten.
 
Last edited:

Chase

It Takes All of Us to End Racism
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
9,239
Reaction score
2,316
Location
Oregon, USA
Okay, I stand corrected; rather I sit corected, as I am seated; except when going for coffee; then walked corrected.
 

Snick

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
934
Reaction score
86
Location
Havatoo
While I was right (of course), I do think that a rewrite is what that paragraph needs.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
Stroking to stroked, but get rid of all those semicolons. They aren't needed, and do not work.
 

pegasus

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
132
Reaction score
15
Location
South
I love semicolons when they're used correctly, but that paragraph puts me off. The complex structure makes it feel overwritten.

I agree that it feels overwritten. The graph made me slow down and examine its form as I read.
 

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,603
Location
NC
Okay, I stand corrected; rather I sit corected, as I am seated; except when going for coffee; then walked corrected.

:ROFL:




I agree that the semicolon use and the structure both need to be simplified, correct or not.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
that paragraph puts me off. The complex structure makes it feel overwritten.

Echo this. The grammar isn't the problem. I suspect some of the comments you're getting from your writing group making grammar suggestions derive from the overwritten nature of the thing, rather than the actual grammar itself. Your readers are seeing something that doesn't work, and have misdirected attention to nitpicking verbs rather than the real central issue.

I sense from this bit of writing that you're just plain trying too hard to get way more stuff jammed in there than you (and your readers) really need.

caw
 

Chrisla

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
49
Location
Northern California
Thank you, all of you, for your insight. I'll go back and look at that paragraph. I think I got sidetracked by their corrections and trying to figure out what was wrong with the structure. I should always remember, if several people see something wrong with material, there is probably something wrong. They may not know exactly what the problem is, but the fact that several people made the correction should have tipped me off that there was a problem.
 

Smirkin

eating cookies late at night
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
428
Reaction score
53
Location
East of home
Chase, I'm with you on the semicolons, and I was in charge of a high school English classroom less than 6 months ago.

I have never known a semicolon could be used in (what seems to me to be) the place of a colon. Isn't a colon supposed to precede items in a series? Did I teach all them kids the wrongest wayzz???
 
Last edited:

Chrisla

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
49
Location
Northern California
Chase, I'm with you on the semicolons, and I was in charge of a high school English classroom less than 6 months ago.

I have never known a semicolon could be used in (what seems to me to be) the place of a colon. Isn't a colon supposed to precede items in a series? Did I teach all them kids the wrongest wayzz???

According to the Chicago Manual of Style on the subject of colons: "When items in a series involve internal punctuation, they should be separated by semicolons."

They give this as an example (and you'll note there's no colon):

The defendant, in an attempt to mitigate his sentence, pleaded that he had recently, and quite unexpectedly, lost his job; that his landlady--whom, incidentally, he had once saved from attack--had threatened him with eviction; and that he had not eaten for several days."
 

Smirkin

eating cookies late at night
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
428
Reaction score
53
Location
East of home
learning learning learning, always learning....
 

Chrisla

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
49
Location
Northern California
As I posted earlier, I've read the comments and realized, since the sentence bothers so many people, that it needed to be rewritten. That I've already done. But there seemed to be so much confusion about the use of semicolons in a series, I had hoped to clear that up.

Thanks again, everybody.