- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 36,987
- Reaction score
- 6,158
- Location
- The right earlobe of North America
Yes, but "they" apparently want Official Government Sanction of it in every state. I knew about Georgia and Florida (by seeing actual license plates - don't know how I missed the news, I suppose I don't keep up well with local and state news).Don't they have stickers for this kind of thing?
Celia, the supporters of this effort want the state to officially sanction their agenda. You have no problem with that?Not really sure what I think about this whole thing. It seems like an unnecessary use of resources. But if that is the way the pro-life movements wants to spend their money, who am I to judge?
Celia, the supporters of this effort want the state to officially sanction their agenda. You have no problem with that?
Yes, I do, and I think there probably should be a pro-choice option as well.
But this won't get me as pissed off as the majority of the shit they've done. And I will say that they have used far more offensive slogans in the past.
Speaking as someone who is vehemently pro-choice, the slogan "choose life" does not offend me at all. If someone wants to promote the idea that someone with an unplanned pregnancy should choose not to have an abortion, I'm fine with that. What bothers me is the notion that a woman should not have that choice.
It's not just spending their money - I have no idea of the figures, but they surely see it as an INVESTMENT - both intangible in getting the "Choose Life" message on thousands (or more) of license plates in each state, and also financial - each purchase of such a plate (which costs more than a regular plate) sends some of the collected funds to organizations that do pregnancy counseling that does not include abortion as a possibility. Once the tag is on place it's a long-term income stream for such organizations.Speaking as someone who is vehemently pro-choice, the slogan "choose life" does not offend me at all. If someone wants to promote the idea that someone with an unplanned pregnancy should choose not to have an abortion, I'm fine with that. What bothers me is the notion that a woman should not have that choice.
Not really sure what I think about this whole thing. It seems like an unnecessary use of resources. But if that is the way the pro-life movements wants to spend their money, who am I to judge?
Most of states with "Choose Life" programs provide, as does Florida, that the proceeds of these sales go exclusively to organizations that counsel women with unwanted pregnancies to choose adoption. In fact, the legislation in most states expressly provides that any program offering referrals or even discussing the option of abortion is barred from funding.
I am solidly pro-choice, but I have complete respect for this approach.If we really believe in supporting life, then we need to focus on creating a society in which women do not feel like abortion is the only option they have. I think it's something both sides could find common ground on, in a debate that is so ridiculously polarized.
I am solidly pro-choice, but I have complete respect for this approach.
I don't know what the big stink over this article is. I see special interest license plates of all kinds here in Colorado, including the Choose Life one (it has a little columbine flower on it, I think).
I don't know what the big stink over this article is. I see special interest license plates of all kinds here in Colorado, including the Choose Life one (it has a little columbine flower on it, I think).