The Shah of Iran also left on February 11th.
Bad omen?
I don't know who the army "sided with" or "how much", but obviously the high brass were taken aback at Mubarak's statement yesterday that he wouldn't resign, when everybody expected him to. Somebody got through to him with an unequivocal message: "Oh yes, you will." The next step would have been a military coup, which would likely have been worse, and certainly for Mubarak. He'll need exile elsewhere to live out his later years in some level of security. Dick Cheney's bedroom?
What comes next? Pretty open, and peaceful is not assured. The lid has been pried off the box, and it's too late to cram the unhappy stuff back in. Whatever comes next, it better be able to provide some degree of material relief to the populace, or Egypt will continue to make bad news.
Finally, a pretty decent post from you.
Congrats.
Join the civilized world in freedom, democracy and separation of church and state.
Don't expect the latter. U.S.ers, have a constitutionally codified separation of church and state. Most places on the planet do not. And Islam simply doesn't recognize the concept. Islam is overarching and universal, it is "church and state", amalgamated in concept so completely that the Western "separation" idea almost doesn't make logical sense.
Actually, the revolt in Iran started in '78. It was largely secular and people were not necessarily hostile to the west. When Khomeini was interviewed during that time he was saying all the right things about democracy, rights etc. There were a huge number of "experts" in the West that said either a. the Islamists have no chance of getting power or b. The Islamists weren't so bad. If you look at much of the coverage of MB during this crisis, you see exactly the same. You see people like Tariq Ramadan throwing open bs at people in the NYT about the MB and nobody basically challenges him. Etc. Etc. One last thing, based on polls, the Egyptian "street" is largely hostile to the West, not very secular etc. You also have to remember that what you see are the more educated dwellers of Cairo and Alexandria, who also constitute maybe 5% of the total population. So, while nothing is certain and written in stone, it is a very real possibility. You want something closer to 2011? Look at what happened in Lebanon.What were the demands of the Egyptian people?? First and foremost: democracy. I cannot understand why so many are trying to equate the Shah of Iran's departure with what has happened today in Egypt. I find it astounding. First of all, the Shah was overthrown in 1979!! That was a LONG time ago in relation to both technology and global communication. Secondly, the majority of Egyptian demonstrators were clearly not hostile to the West, nor were they screaming in praise of a theocratic governance. I mean, come on. I see no danger of a theocratic "takeover" in Egypt. What I see are external forces about to shoot themselves in the foot by being meddlesome and selfish. . . .
So you agree then that this revolution will end up the way Iran's did?