Starting novel with dialogue

Status
Not open for further replies.

ILUVJLD

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
68
Reaction score
3
Location
Virginia
Website
www.myspace.com
I searched but couldn't find anything. Sorry if this has been posted. But I heard it was frowned upon to start a novel with dialogue. My novel is in first person and is about a gay guy/straight guy friendship that starts to blur the lines of sexuality. Here's my first two lines

"You haven't met my brother yet, have you?"
That's the first time I heard about him. When that's all he simply was, him.

I just dont' want to start off with points against me. Let me know your opinions.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
I've read the same advice. I reckon it applies to longer exchanges where the talking characters are undefined blanks and dialogue has zero context, so it's harder for the reader to understand what the heck they're talking about. One opening line, not so much of a problem.

-Derek
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I've read the same advice. I reckon it applies to longer exchanges where the talking characters are undefined blanks and dialogue has zero context, so it's harder for the reader to understand what the heck they're talking about. One opening line, not so much of a problem.

"What's it going to be then, eh?"

-- opening line from A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess.

Which was followed by a crisply written paragraph of descriptive narrative that totally establishes scene and characters. A long stretch of dialogue, even with attribution by name, generally doesn't work, for lack of context. But a single line, even two, can often be effective. This "rule" is much like the one about never using a preposition to end a sentence with.

caw
 

kaitie

With great power comes
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
11,732
Reaction score
4,650
Eh, I do it. Whether I do it successfully or not is another matter, but the point is as long as it works and it's done right, it's fine.
 

DrZoidberg

aka TomOfSweden
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
95
Location
Stockholm
Website
tomknox.se
I love it. Another piece of authorly advice is, get to the action straight away. Starting with dialogue certainly does that.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
Another piece of authorly advice is, get to the action straight away. Starting with dialogue certainly does that.
Some (well okay, me) might argue that dialogue isn't action, but that's probably a picky personal perception thing.

-Derek
 

Stijn Hommes

Know what you write...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
2,309
Reaction score
128
Location
Netherlands
Website
www.peccarymagazine.5u.com
The problem with advice, is that is usually ripped from the context it was given in. People who recommend against opening with dialogue want avoid having talking heads with no personality talking about something the reader has no clue about.

That said, throwing down the gauntlet and forcing the reader to face questions straight away is a way to get them involved in the story.

My advice would be to finish the story and put it to some non-writer friends and see what they think about the opening.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
Opening with dialogue out of the blue needs to be thought about very carefully and should have a purpose other than simply being a clever or gimmicky start.

While the writer knows in advance exactly who is saying what to whom, where, when, how and why, it should be remembered the reader does not.

The reader starts from scratch and can only build images and pictures from what he reads as he reads it.

In my humble opinion the quoted lines in the original post contain too many pronouns and lack clarity.

But finish the story while the momentum is good and worry about how to start once you're finished - the starting point can sometimes become clearer or may require to be changed once one has finished the tale and can see the whole picture.
 
Last edited:

backslashbaby

~~~~*~~~~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
12,635
Reaction score
1,605
Location
NC
I like it if you are given who is saying what very quickly. It doesn't have to be exactly who, but build the scene. Let us be there, too. Voices floating around can be hard on visual folks :)
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
It is frowned on because it's usually done poorly, without purpose, or with bland dialogue that doesn't make the reader want to read the next line.

The right line of dialogue can make for a great opening, but finding that right line can be tough, and if the line is actively bad or boring, it can stop an agent or editor from reading the next line.

I really hate the philosophy "if it works, do it." That's fine for a hard science, or even for a mechanical problem, but writing isn't like an engine that you can experiment on, and then try to start to to see if your experiment worked. Every last writer out there thinks his writing works, or he wouldn't submit it. Very little submitted fiction works.

Having said that, soem very good fiction opens with dialogue, when the writer finds just the right character, and has that character say just the right thing.
 

third person

She blinded me--with magic!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
863
Reaction score
90
Location
In my head.
I frown upon writers who worry about things that are frowned upon. And then I weep. Our kind would never have gotten anywhere if we obsessed about what's frowned upon, you hear?
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
We writers should understand what are rules (such as the grammatically correct way to use semicolons) and what are just opinions, best practices or general guidelines.

And all writers should learn how to break rules, but ONLY after they know what the rules are.

Happy writing.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
I frown upon writers who worry about things that are frowned upon. And then I weep. Our kind would never have gotten anywhere if we obsessed about what's frowned upon, you hear?

If you don't worry about what's frowned upon, you'll probably never write what isn't frowned upon.

It's not a matter of obsession, but of common sense. If you don;t learn from those who have gone before, and if you don't know what why something is frowned upon, why such advice is out there, how on earth are you going to get anything right?

I don't know what "our kind" means, but I do know there's always a sound and solid reason why any given thing is frowned on, and if you don't know that reason, you're in trouble.
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
> "You haven't met my brother yet, have you?"
> That's the first time I heard about him. When that's all he simply was, him.

Forget about rules. Where's the hook?

-cb
 

kellion92

A cat may not look at a king
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
5,245
Reaction score
4,613
Location
The edge
Soooo many published books begin this way, and I personally like dialogue openings. But I have read this advice often and thus changed my own opening to avoid dialogue. When you're starting out, who needs extra hurdles to jump over?

Then again I just picked up a well-reviewed book that began, "It was going to be a beautiful day." What could be more dull? But this was the author's fourth or fifth novel, and obviously the rules are different for different people. (I didn't keep reading. I was a little iffy on it anyway, and the opening didn't draw me in).
 
Last edited:

gothicangel

Toughen up.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
692
Location
North of the Wall
Does it have to be spoken dialogue?

Take the first lines of Pride and Prejudice [It's a truth universally acknowledged . . .] These days it's a popular misconception that it's dialogue [thanks to the BBC adaption], it isn't, it's the narratorial voice.
 

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
I bet this isn't the most interesting way you can start this book.
 

Wayne R.

Registered
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Location
London/Derbyshire
I tried it for myself once, kind of an exercise because I find dialogue hard to write. The opening chapter was a conversation between four characters. Each had to be different in the way they spoke so you could track the conversation, and the hope was that by the end of the story you'd be able to re-read it and know exactly who'd said what.
Whether it worked or not isn't for me to say, but I wasn't reading a rulebook as I worked on it so it seemed fair game at the time.
 

DennisB

Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
397
Reaction score
22
Location
Frankfort, Indiana
If it works, it works.
But to make it work, the character should probably say something interesting. "This will be the day that I die," Joe said..... would work (Apologies to Don McLean.)

"Would you like that tuna sandwich with mayo or salad dressing?" asked the waitress... had better be backed up with something really strong in the next couple of sentences.
 

Lady Ice

Makes useful distinctions
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
4,776
Reaction score
417
> "You haven't met my brother yet, have you?"
> That's the first time I heard about him. When that's all he simply was, him.

Forget about rules. Where's the hook?

-cb

I think it's a hook. The reader has presumably already read the blurb and those first lines trigger the thought in the reader's head that this 'him' is going to be very important. And it's believable.

Dialogue can make a bad beginning because it's either too boring: 'Hello, Mary', or too obvious: 'I'm going to kill you, Billy!', or too clever for its own good: 'You look at me like the ocean looks at the sky'.

Generally the worst sort of beginning is either starting a lengthy description or a trite epigram: 'Love is like fine wine...'
 

Adagio

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
429
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
""Darlings! Welcome! And you must be Danielle?" Sleek and small, her wide eyes rendered enormous by kohl, Lucy Leverett, in spite of her resemblance to a baby seal, rasped impressively. Her dangling fan earrings clanked at her neck as she leaned in to kiss each of them, Danielle too, and although she held her cigarette, in its mother-of-pearl holder, at arm's length, its smoke wafted between them and brought tears to Danielle's eyes."

This is how The Emperor's Children by Claire Messud, a highly praised literary novelist, begins. The novel received good reviews. Danielle is one of the main characters, and Lucy Leverett will disappear after the first chapter. Danielle and her friends visit Lucy, the host of a party, where Danielle will meet another main character. I believe this kind of beginning is a way to introduce characters. It's not dialogue, though. I loved the novel.

Adagio
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.