View Full Version : read the tragic story of what happened to a fellow screenwriter/tv writer
JustinoXXV
06-30-2005, 11:31 PM
Worse, one of the writers is thinking about suicide if you look at the account.
http://scriptsales.com/boards/showthread.php?t=11014
The ImagiNation
07-01-2005, 12:45 AM
this is very sad. i still don't understand why "Wayne" would do something like this?
TheRuleofThirds
07-01-2005, 12:54 AM
Fallen world.
Lesson learned - thanks for waking us up! Sometimes, when our heads are in the clouds we are too high to see the storm brewing underneath.
Rock
WritingFool
07-01-2005, 07:53 AM
You can say this and that about what i would have could have and should have done.
Some slimy people out there, and they're good at it.
But I will say this, if that guy did that too me, and I had any information about his whereabouts, I would be cruisin the area until I found him.
Then he'd pay me my money!
My good friend Beretta would make sure of that!
Joe Calabrese
07-01-2005, 08:16 AM
Maybe he needed the money to buy some fire trucks. check out
http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050323/gift.shtml
sspunisher
07-01-2005, 08:30 AM
Maybe I'm just a jerk, but I'd sue the hell outta him, and request one of those firetrucks.
Ivonia
07-01-2005, 10:07 AM
Well, this is certainly enlightening news for me, and hopefully others as well. I guess things are not always as they seem.
JustinoXXV
07-01-2005, 10:46 AM
Or alternatively, you could contact the US Labor Department and the California State Commission.
Los Angeles District Office
US Dept. of Labor
ESA Wage & Hour Division
300 S. Glendale Ave., Suite 400
Glendale, CA 91205-1791
Telephone number 818-240-5274
Go to this link to download a wage claim form from the state of California.
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/HowToFileWageClaim.htm
Not just in Hollywood, there are other cases in which employers for a variety of reasons won't pay employers. What do the federal and state governments do? Investigate and force the employers to pay, even if they have to take them to court.
In most cases, it is illegal not to pay people less than the minimum wage. There are also tax issues involved here. So all said parties have to do is file complaints, let the feds and the state investigate (a lengthy process), and they'll get their backwages eventually. After the backwages are paid, the IRS will step in for backtaxes, and any assets this guy has would be seized by them.
sprorion
07-01-2005, 11:00 AM
Thank you for posting this warning for us. Reminds us to keep on our toes.
screenwriter
07-01-2005, 08:48 PM
Wow that would be absolutely horrific to think that here you are finally making it. Making a good living at it too. Then to be totally duped by some jerk. Well, I hope those guy's do make some money from their experience. They have got to have some good karma coming back their way.
TheRuleofThirds
07-01-2005, 11:37 PM
Wonder what the people in the firetruck town would think if they knew Wayne Highway-Heist was a crook? That their trucks were donated from a dirty man? They're in the Bible Belt and they like decent people...
Joe Calabrese
07-01-2005, 11:50 PM
I wonder if he used the "donation" as a tax right off and then never bought the fire trucks for them.
I smell a lynching party coming.
TheRuleofThirds
07-01-2005, 11:57 PM
You git the tar and I'll git the chicken fur!
sspunisher
07-02-2005, 03:32 AM
I'd opt for gasoline and matches, and make him wear a beret.
Mac H.
07-03-2005, 09:17 AM
Wonder what the people in the firetruck town would think if they knew Wayne Highway-Heist was a crook? That their trucks were donated from a dirty man?
I doubt he donated the fire trucks at all. The newspaper clipping is all about him PROMISING to do it, and how the fire department is being cautious enough not to put on extra staff until they see the actual purchase order.
Such extravagant gestures seems perfectly in line with his behaviour in pretending to hire all the writing staff.
Mac
TheRuleofThirds
07-04-2005, 06:47 AM
I doubt he donated the fire trucks at all. The newspaper clipping is all about him PROMISING to do it, and how the fire department is being cautious enough not to put on extra staff until they see the actual purchase order.
Such extravagant gestures seems perfectly in line with his behaviour in pretending to hire all the writing staff.
Mac
True, true.
Enigma
07-09-2005, 04:14 PM
There's a saying in the newspaper business: Trust, but verify.
JustinoXXV
07-10-2005, 02:36 PM
Another is saying don't count your chickens before the eggs HATCH.
Also, for these kinds of deals, the deal isn't officially done until the CHECK CLEARS.
All the writers had to do is insist on being PAYED upfront. Apparently none of them used an agent.
JERETHAL
07-10-2005, 09:51 PM
I write bids and proposals for big building projects. I'll even write a grant proposal or a business plan sometime. I always get money up front with a back-end bonus. I've been beat out of the back-end, but I always get the upfront.
Once, a friend asked me to do the bid and proposal for a $880,000.00 tile and marble job. He said he'd give me $800.00 to do the work and $4,000.00 backend. I looked at the General and the Subs. The subs weren't reliable and the General was a crook. I smelled trouble so I asked for $1600.00 up front with no back. The friend got beat out of hundreds of thousands from the General because the subs were bums.
Now, my friend is bidding on bridge repairs for the State. He wants me to do all the bids. Sometimes when you ask questions and look past the money dangled in front of you , it can keep on paying. My friend wouldn't trust any other B/P writer because I'm careful to make sure everybody can do what they say they can do. I might hate myself for not walkin away, but suicide would be out of the question.
I know the feeling though. Last week i was holding a full house - 10's over queens. I lost a $4,800.00 pot to four 10's in a game of hold em. Three tens were on the board. I had queens in the hole. The guy i lost to had the fourth 10. I was surprised because he didn't act like he did. That little deal cost me the whole grand i went with, plus 2oo I had to borrow at the table. I'm still mad at myself. I guess I really did know he had that 10, but that pot was callin my name. But I won $4,900.00 last night on the 2nd race at the Meadows harness track on a 495 trifecta. You just never know when the worm will turn. Keep smilin and hopin.
Joe Calabrese
07-13-2005, 04:45 PM
Saw this tip today on WIll Martels useful site (scriptsecrets.net) and thought I'd pass along..
YOUR FIRST CONTRACT
The good news: A producer loves your script and wants to buy it!
The bad news: He doesn't want to pay you much (or anything) up front, but assures you that this can be your big break into the business! Your name up there on the big screen!
You need a lawyer. Anyone who represents himself has a fool for a client. There is no such thing as a standard contract - everything is negotiable. The contract a producer offers you is stacked in the producer's favor... it was drawn up by HIS lawyer. You need your own lawyer to balance it out. But lawyers can be expensive - how can you tell if this deal is worth the expense?
Here is some quick, lay-advice on contracts. I am not a lawyer, but I've sold enough scripts to know what a bad deal looks like, so here are some things to watch out for...
DEFERRED SALARIES
Are worthless. If a producer offers you no (or little) money up front against a percentage of the finished film's sales, run away! There are garages full of completed films that have no distributor and will never earn a cent. My friend runs a large film crewing agency - he crews about 3,000-4,000 films a year. Less than 1,000 of those get ANY form of release. The rest don't get theatrical or video or cable or shown in drive-ins or on airplanes or in prisons or even video release in foreign countries. Nobody ever sees them and they never make a cent. They LOSE money! If the film is made and NEVER RELEASED not only do you make nothing off a deferred salary deal, your script is dead forever (unless you have a clause returning it to you). You have just sold your script for a percentage of profits that don't exist! You sold your script for nothing. My friend with the crewing agency tells his people not to work for deferred salaries, and that's my advice, too.
On any film where you are not paid up front, you are a PRODUCER - you are investing your screenplay into the project. If they have the cajones to offer you a deferred salary, are they also offering you a producer credit and gross participation in the profits?
They are going to spend actual money to rent equipment, buy raw stock, pay lab fees, hire actors. The crew will be getting paid (my friend at the crewing agency will see to that) so why should the writer be the only guy not paid? If they can afford to pay for equipment, they can afford to pay for the script. If they CAN'T afford to pay for the script, the film is probably so low budget that it has no chance of being released (so that deferred pay means nothing). Movie distributors want stars (some level), and professional production values. The film is sitting on the shelf at Blockbuster next to some big Hollywood blockbuster - the consumer needs some reason to rent THIS film over the one that stars Bruce Willis and his asteroid. (#2 has to try harder). If this film is offering NOTHING, it will not be picked up... and end up in someone's garage forever.
Exception: If you're doing it for love. If this project's value to you is NOT as a commercial venture. Know that when you enter into any deal, the money in your contract is all you will ever get. Those "monkey points" are worthless. The back end deal just means the writer takes it in the back end. Any money contingent on something else happening is no money at all. If you want to DONATE your script to a film - that's your call. You can screen the film in your garage, and be happy.
WHAT YOU SHOULD MAKE
On a low budget (including non-WGA) movie a screenwriter should make about 2%-3% of the film's budget (you may make more or less, but that's the ballpark). You should have your lawyer try for additional "bumps" based on the film's performance in ancillary markets. These "bumps" will be bonuses if the film sells a large number of videos or has a successful foreign theatrical release or shows on additional cable networks. My contracts have "bumps" for HBO, Showtime, USA Network sales and for over a certain number of videos & DVDs sold. These "bumps" cost the producer nothing - but if the film is successful, I participate in all of that cash pouring in... as I should. I made up the story.
Greg Godell's Independent film budgeting book says to budget 5% for script purchase and development overhead (I think it's on page 72). That percentage is echoed in every budgeting book I've ever seen. If your producer thinks 3% is too much to pay, have him look it up (he'll probably be using that budgeting book anyway, since it focuses on low budget films). Paying a writer 3% of the budget is completely reasonable.
You should also get "net points" - also known as "monkey points" - a percentage of any net profit. You should get somewhere between 2% and 5% depending on how important your script is to the over-all deal. "Monkey points" are usually worthless - creative book keeping makes sure that even the biggest hit film never makes any actual profit. Remember that COMING TO AMERICA grossed hundreds of millions of dollars... but was still in the red when Art Buchwald sued Paramount for his "monkey points"!
I have written very low budget films (CYBERZONE) and got my 3% (plus "bumps"). The average low budget contract pays the writer part of the fee on signing the contract, a fee for each rewrite (usually three), and the rest of the money when the film actually goes into production (called a "production bonus"). It isn't a lump sum, it's paying for each task as it's performed. Most have a "buy-back" clause in the event the film never goes into production. Make sure your lawyer puts a buy-back clause in your contract! You don't want to have any scripts in limbo - you don't own them, but the producer has no plans to make them. My COURTING DEATH script was sold to a company on the Paramount lot who has no intention of ever making it.
Last: There are two types of low budget, and two types of criminal activities. Organized and small time wackos. Organized crime makes money, they wear suits, they are businessmen. They have offices. You can depend on them. They've been doing this for years. They play by the odds and don't take any chances. Small time wackos rob a liquor store because they need a heroin fix. They are undependable, have no idea if they will live out the day. Everything is a long shot. You don't want to work with the wackos. There are plenty of organized low budget guys out there with offices, distribution deals in place, and plenty of past credits. The thing that separates a REAL producer from someone who just claims to be a producer is... What have they produced?
That should be the very first question you ask after they tell you how much they loved your script - "Great! I'd like to get a feel for the kind of films your company produces, can you recommend one of your films for me to rent?"
Then really go out and rent the movie. It will give you a very good idea of what you're getting in to!
copyright 2005 by William C. Martell
buzzearl
07-15-2005, 12:59 AM
Hence the book, The Writer Got Screwed but Didn't Have to by Brooke A. Wharton (A guid the the Legal and Business Pratices of Writing for the Entertainment Industry). What I'm not seeing in the story is any mention of representation or any kind--a representative of any kind, be it attorney, agent, or manager should check out if the producer is legit--And as Brooke Wharton points out in her book, any writer can call the WGA Signatories Department and ask if a company is a signatory to the WGA. This should be a first step when working for an unknown entity, especially if the producer makes the mistake of claiming to be a WGA Signatory.
But more to the point, this is a case of fraud--Contact the LA City Attorneys Office.
JustinoXXV
07-15-2005, 06:08 AM
Apparently none of the parties used an agent. One of the parties did have an entertainment lawyer go over the contract.
I agree, had they had an agent over the contract, this all would have been avoided as I doubt the agent would have let them write anything without getting paid (a deal isn't closed until the check clears the bank).
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.