PDA

View Full Version : Jimmy Carter and his 1979 "Crisis of Confidence" speech


Plot Device
08-16-2008, 07:02 AM
This speech (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/filmmore/ps_crisis.html) by Carter is considered by commentators (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter#.22Malaise.22_speech) to be the greatest of his career. In it he said that Americans themselves were partially to blame for the state of the American economy. He spoke of rampant consumerism and a pernicious form of self-focus he called "me-ism" (which is a startlingly accurate term for describing what our society has today achieved, but in spades).

It was NOT a feel-good speech. Nor was it a locker room pep talk. Nor was it a chin-up-we-can-pull-through-this-one proclamation. It was a dark and somber admonition for Americans to re-examine their style of living, their spending habits, and their sense of entitlement.

http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2008/08/13/past-and-present-malaise-and-the-energy-crisis.html?PageNr=1

Past and Present: 'Malaise' and the Energy Crisis
Jimmy Carter's speech is remembered for something he never said—we should recall what he did say

By Kevin Mattson (http://www.usnews.com/Topics/tag/Author/m/mattson_kevin/index.html)

August 13, 2008

The president of the United States was rumored to have disappeared or gone crazy. It was July 5, 1979, and Jimmy Carter had canceled a speech scheduled for national television that evening. During the day, as the press pondered his infirmity, the president was at Camp David, consulting his staff about a broad "crisis of confidence" that his young pollster, Patrick Caddell, had diagnosed.

He spent 10 more days at the Maryland mountain retreat, meeting with not only staff but also political and civic leaders from various walks of life. On July 15, 1979—a Sunday, fit for a national sermon—Carter went in front of television cameras to give the most important speech of his presidency. He spoke in dire terms of the "crisis of confidence." Since then, his words have been remembered as the "malaise" speech, a word never uttered during it but later grafted onto it by the media and Carter's political opponents, Ted Kennedy to the left and Ronald Reagan to the right. "Malaise" stuck.

As with so many other things from the Carter years, the speech has been misremembered, mocked on The Simpsons, or glossed in college textbooks. But with energy prices again reaching record highs, the speech is worth recalling today not simply for what Carter proposed but also for how he did so.

What Carter really did in the speech was profound. He warned Americans that the 1979 energy crisis—both a shortage of gas and higher prices—stemmed from the country's way of life. "Too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does but by what one owns," the president said. Consumerism provided people with false happiness, he suggested, but it also prevented Americans from re-examining their lives in order to confront the profound challenge the energy crisis elicited.

Bartholomew
08-16-2008, 08:18 AM
No wonder people don't remember him well. He didn't seem concerned about popularity.

AncientEagle
08-17-2008, 12:51 AM
No wonder people don't remember him well. He didn't seem concerned about popularity.

(My bold.) He still doesn't. I've never been a big fan, but I recently had lunch with him and his wife, in a private home in their hometown. At an age when you might expect a little slowing down and maybe some mental fatigue, I found him incredibly on top of things, quick-witted, and impressive in person. He has, with no fanfare, done some things in that little Southern town to improve race relations that, even today, would get some people ostracized. He just goes his own way, low key, very old shoe, unconcerned if he's popular or not.

Don
08-17-2008, 01:47 AM
(My bold.) He still doesn't. I've never been a big fan, but I recently had lunch with him and his wife, in a private home in their hometown. At an age when you might expect a little slowing down and maybe some mental fatigue, I found him incredibly on top of things, quick-witted, and impressive in person. He has, with no fanfare, done some things in that little Southern town to improve race relations that, even today, would get some people ostracized. He just goes his own way, low key, very old shoe, unconcerned if he's popular or not.
I never cared for Carter as President, but I envy you your lunch. I think he's been an extremely classy ex-President, setting an example with things like Habitat for Humanity.

I think he was overwhelmed by the political aspects of the Presidency and made some bad mistakes, besides believing that he could use force to achieve positive ends. That said, I think he's probably the most respectable man we've had in that post for perhaps a century.

rugcat
08-17-2008, 02:20 AM
II think he was overwhelmed by the political aspects of the Presidency and made some bad mistakes, besides believing that he could use force to achieve positive ends. That said, I think he's probably the most respectable man we've had in that post for perhaps a century.If you'll remember, he authorized a rescue mission for the hostages, a strike team designed to get in and out quickly, before the Iranians could react. It's the exact sort of thing that the Israelis have been so successful at, notably at Entebbe.

Due to a combination of poor tactical planning, lack of coordination among service branches, bad weather, and bad luck, the mission was a complete failure.

But had it succeeded, which in theory was entirely possible, it would have been seen as a bold and brilliant move. It would have affected the rest of his presidency, and I think his stature and place in history would have been viewed very differently.

Plot Device
08-17-2008, 06:51 AM
Rugcat: I agree that if the rescue had worked, it would have changed everything. But sadly it did not.

Meanwhile, I am told that Carter and his people consulted ahead of time with Israel about their planned rescue attempt, and Israel warned them vehemently against using choppers in the desert at night. "The sand will ruin your equipment. You will have no visibility." But Carter and his people ignored this warning.

And then the sand and zero visibility proved to be the undoing of the mission.

The only good that came of it was that the US military immediately got on the stick and in less than ten years developed a new generation of choppers that were sand-resistent.





And Ancient Eagle: I ditto the lunch envy. I have said in the past five years that Carter is a man I'd definitely like to meet and talk to.

And I made another post here at AW some time in the past 90 days where I said Carter was an amazing human being and a great man (worth a lunch date), just a lousy president. However, I want to amend that sentiment now: he presented an energy policy that COULD have worked, but the whole Iran fiasco sank his presidency, and also sank his energy policy right along with it.




.

mscelina
08-17-2008, 07:04 AM
You know, I've always taken a completely opposite view of Carter's "Crisis of Confidence" speech. I remember watching it as a little kid. At the end, I looked at my parents and said, "The President is giving up."

And almost 30 years later I feel much the same way. The office defeated Carter. His defeat (and defeatism) was brutal beneath the horrible point of view of public opinion. I think he was emotionally tortured in the last year of his presidency, devastated by a governmental failure he took--and accepted--the lion's share of the blame. There are no doubts in my mind that Carter was/is essentially a good man, a man of integrity. If he'd keep his nose out of international affairs, I'd probably have a bit more respect for him but Habitat supersedes his nosiness in my mind. At a different time, in a different world, Carter's legacy would be one of moderate interest. As it is, however, his term set the stage for the America that evolved in the eighties and the shift to Teflon politics--an atmosphere in which a good man cannot survive.

Which reinforces my opinion that good people have no business being in the Oval Office.

SLThomas
08-17-2008, 01:26 PM
Was this the speech where he asked people to wear a sweater at home during the energy crisis?

I heard that he got slammed at the time for daring to ask his fellow Americans to wear an extra layer!
How dare he! (joke!)

AncientEagle
08-17-2008, 09:44 PM
You know, I've always taken a completely opposite view of Carter's "Crisis of Confidence" speech. I remember watching it as a little kid. At the end, I looked at my parents and said, "The President is giving up."

And almost 30 years later I feel much the same way.

I have accused Carter of many things, but giving up on anything at all is about the last thing I'd choose. He's stubborn and stiff-necked to the nth degree, which can be a blessing or a curse. I see one of his failings as president that he came to Washington as an outsider and then refused to become an insider. His staff likewise, only moreso. He insisted on feeding the country a bitter pill that was not made more palatable by its correctness, when a more flexible politician might have camouflaged it a little.

And then there's always the matter of just sheer luck. Sometimes it runs good, sometimes it runs bad. Other things may outweigh it, but it can be a factor.

Incidentally, he's a fitting subject for AbsoluteWrite, as he considers himself a writer more than a politician. That's the only thing that enrages me about him: He's published more than 20 books, while I'm still trying to get the first one out of the publisher.

If only I had his platform...